Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T17:15:54.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Loess Problem of China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

George B. Barbour
Affiliation:
Yenching University, Peking.

Summary

—An analysis of the Loess problem is made on the basis of recent studies co-ordinating results of research along a variety of lines. Sources of confusion in the past are indicated, and the question of the delimitation of the term “loess” is discussed.

In China the Loess is essentially an aeolian deposit formed under special climatic conditions which ruled, though in different degrees, at two distinct epochs in the Pleistocene period that seem to correspond to the Günz-Mindel and Riss-Würm twin-glaciations respectively. The variations in the deposits and the relation between them, the associated fresh-water sediments, and recognizable stages in the physiographic evolution of the landscape are described. The character and implications of the fossil content are discussed, especially in their bearing on the problems of former climates and of exact correlation of geological events.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Andersson, J. Gunnar. “Essays in the Cenozoic of Northern China”: Geol. Surv. China Mem., A 3, Peking, 1923.Google Scholar
Barbour, G. B.. “The Loess of China”: China Jour. Sc. and Arts, vol. iii, 1925, p. 454 ff., p. 509 ff., Shanghai (abridged reprint in Smithson. Ann. Rep., 1926).Google Scholar
Barbour, G. B.. “Geology of the Kalgan Area”: Geol. Surv. China Mem., A 6, Peking, 1929.Google Scholar
, Barbour, , Licent and , Teilhard. “Geological Study of the Deposits of the Sangkanho Basin”: Bull. Geol. Soc. China, vol. v, 1927, p. 263.Google Scholar
, Berkey and , Morris. “Geology of Mongolia”: Natural History of Mongolia, vol. ii, Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York, 1927.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. L.. “Some Unusual Erosion Features in the Loess of China”: Geog. Review, vol. xii, 1922, p. 270.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W.. “Summary of the Cenozoic and Psychozoic Deposits of Asia”: Bull. Geol. Soc. China, vol. vi, 1927, p. 151 ff., 196 ff.Google Scholar
Pumpelly, R.. “Geological Researches in China, Mongolia and Japan”: Smithsonian Contrib. Knowledge, vol. xv, Washington, 1866.Google Scholar
Pumpelly, R.. “Relations of Secular Rock Disintegration to Loess, Glacial Drift, and Rock Basins”: Amer. Jour. Sc. and Arts, vol. xvii, 1879, p. 133.Google Scholar
Richthofen, F. von. China, vol. ii, Berlin, 1882; and Atlas, 1885.Google Scholar
Chardin, P. Teilhard de. “Étude géologique sur la region de Dalainoor”: Mem. Soc. géol. France, vii, t. 3, fasc. 3, Paris, 1926.Google Scholar
, Teilhard and , Licent. “Observations géol. sur la bordure de l' Ordos”: Bull. Soc. géol. France, t. 24, 1924, p. 49 and p. 462.Google Scholar
Teilhard, and Licent, . “Formations quaternaires et tertiaires supérieures du Honan at Chansi”: Bull. Geol. Soc. China, vol. vi, 1927, p. 129.Google Scholar
Teilhard, and Young, . “Preliminary Report on the Chou-Kou-tien Fossiliferous Deposit”: Bull. Geol. Soc. China, vol. viii, 1929, p. 173.Google Scholar
Teilhard, and Young, . “Pre-loessic and post-Pontian formations in western Shansi”: Geol. Surv. China Mem., A 8 (in press).Google Scholar
Willis, and Blackwelder, . Research in China, vol. i, pt. 1, Washington, 1907.Google Scholar
Wright, W. F.. “Recent Geological Changes in Northern and Central Asia”: Q.J.G.S., vol. lvii, 1901, p. 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, W. F.. “Origin and Distribution of the Loess of North China”: Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., vol. xiii, 1902, p. 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yih, L. F.. “Geology of Hsishan”: Geol. Surv. China Mem., A 1, 1920.Google Scholar