Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T03:03:15.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mooreocrinus and Ureocrinus gen. nov., with Notes on the family Cromyocrinidae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

James Wright  and
Harrell L. Strimple
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the course of discussions on Echinoderms between the senior and junior authors, the family Cromyocrinidae came under scrutiny and in view of a vital link of evidence in the form of a Pennsylvanian (Upper Carboniferous) specimen of Ulocrinus buttsi Miller and Gurley with the arms attached, found by the junior author a few years ago, the following interpretation of the family is suggested.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 82 , Issue 5 , October 1945 , pp. 221 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bassler, R. S., 1938. Pelmatozoa Palaeozoica. Fossillium Catalogus, Gravenhage, Animalia, 1–194.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A., 1900. In Lankester’s Zoology, iii, Echinoderma, London.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1916–1917. Some British Specimens of Ulocrinus. Trans. Geol. Soc., Glasgow, xvi, 203–219.Google Scholar
de Koninck, L., 1858. On Two Genera of British Palaeozoic Crinoids. Geologist, iv, 04, v, 05, i–ii, pl. iv.Google Scholar
Fischer von Waldheim, G., 1837. Oryctographie du Gouvernment de Moscou, Moscow, 1830–37, pl. xli, figs. 5, 6.Google Scholar
Geinitz, H. B., 1846. Grundriss der Versteinerungskunde, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O., 1918. Phylogenie und System der Pelmatozoen. Palaeont. Zeitschr., 3, 1–128.Google Scholar
Keyes, C. R., 1894. Palaeontology of Missouri, pt. i. Missouri Geol. Survey, 4, 143–225, pls. 19–31.Google Scholar
Kirk, E., 1937. Eupachycrinus and Related Carboniferous Crinoid Genera. Journ. Paleontology, ii, No. 7, 598–607, pl 84.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R., and Bowsher, A. L., 1941. Mississippian Formations of Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico. Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, 25, No. 12, 2107–2160.Google Scholar
McCoy, F., 1860. In British Palaeozoic Rocks and Fossils, by Sedgwick and McCoy, Cambridge, 117, pl. 3D, Fig. 4.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. K., 1861. Cyathocrinus? sangamonensis M. and W. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad., 392.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. K. 1866. Geol. Surv. Illinois, Palaeontology, ii, 310–312, pl. 26, figs. 1a, 1b.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, F. E., 1890. Description of some new genera and species of Echinodermata from the Coal Measures and Sub-carboniferous rocks of Indiana, Missouri, and Iowa. Journ. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., 04 and 06, 1–59, pls. 1–10.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, F. E., 1893. Description of Some New Species of Invertebrates from the Palaeozoic Rocks of Illinois and Adjacent States. Bull. No. 3, Illinois State Museum Nat. Hist., 1–81, pls. i–viii.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., 1939. New Crinoids from Upper Pennsylvanian and Lower Permian Rocks of Oklahoma, Kansas and Nebraska. Denison Univ. Bull. Journ. Sci. Lab., xxxiv, art. 6, 171–279, pls. v–ix.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. and Laudon, L. R., 1943. Evolution and Classification of Palaeozoic Crinoids. Geol. Soc. Amer., Special Papers, No. 46.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. and Plummer, F. B., 1937. Upper Carboniferous Crinoids from the Morrow subseries of Arkansas, Oklahoma and Texas. Denison Univ. Bull. Journ. Sci. Lab., xxxii, 209–313, pls. xii–xvi.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. and Plummer, F. B. 1940. Crinoids from the Upper Carboniferous and Permian Strata in Texas. Univ. Texas Publication 3945, 9–68, pls. 1–21.Google Scholar
Schmidt, W. E., 1930. Die Echinodermen des deutschen Unterkarbons. Preuss. Geol. Landesanst., 122, 1–92, pls. 1–3.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L., 1939. A Group of Pennsylvanian Crinoids from the Vicinity of Bartlesville, Oklahoma. Bull. Amer. Paleontology, No. 87, 1–21, pls. 1–3.Google Scholar
Trautschold, H., 1867. Einige Crinoideen und Andere Thierreste des jungeren Bergkalks in Gouvernment Moskau. Bull. Soc. Imper. des. Nat. de Moscou, xl, No. iii, 1–49, pls. i–v.Google Scholar
Trautschold, H. 1879. Die Kalkbruche von Myatschowa, eine Monographie des oberon Bergkalks. Nouv. Mem. Soc. Nat. Moscou, xiv, 101–180, pls. xii–xviii.Google Scholar
Ure, D., 1793. History of Rutherglen and East Kilbride, Glasgow, 325, pl. xviii, fig. 12.Google Scholar
Waagen, W., 1887. Salt Range Fossils, Productus Limestone Fossils. Palaeontologica Indica, Ser. III, 1.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1879. 1885, 1886. Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, pts. i and iii.Google Scholar
Wanner, J., 1924. Die Permischen Krinoiden von Timor, II, The Hague, 1–348, pls. i–xxii.Google Scholar
Wanner, J. 1937. Neue Beitrage zur Kenntnis der parmischen Echinodermen von Timor, VIII–XIII. Palaeontographica, Suppl. Bd. 4, 57–212, pls. 5–14.Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H., 1882. Descriptions of fifty-four new species of crinoids from the Lower Carboniferous limestones and Coal Measures of Illinois and Iowa. III. State Mus. Nat. Hist. Bull., i, 1–38.Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H. and Miller, S. A., 1883. Palaeontology of Illinois, Descriptions of Fossil Invertebrates. III. Geol. Surv., 7, 265–322, pls. 27–31.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1926. Notes on the Anal Plates of Eupachycrinus calyx and Zeacrinus konincki. Geol. Mag., lxiii, 145–164, text-figs. 1–90, pis. xv, xvi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. 1927. Some Variations in Ulocrinus and Hydreionocrinus. Geol. Mag., lxiv, 353–372, text-figs. 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. 1934. New Scottish and Irish Fossil Crinoids. Geol. Mag., lxxi, 241–268, pls. xiii–xv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. 1936. New Scottish Carboniferous Crinoids. Geol. Mag., 385–412, pls. vii–x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. 1938. Anemetocrinus N.G., a five-armed Poteriocrinid from the Lower Carboniferous Limestones of Scotland. Geol. Mag., 337–346, pls. xii–xiv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. 1939–1940. The Scottish Carboniferous Crinoidea. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., pt. i (No. 1), 1–78, pls. i–xii.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1945. Tyrieocrinus (gen. nov.) and Scotiacrinus (gen. nov.) and Seven New Species of Inadunate Crinoids from the Carboniferous Limestones of Scotland and Yorkshire. Geol. Mag., lxxxii, 114–125, pls. ii–iv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yakovlev, N., 1930. Faune des Echinodermes du Permo-Carbonifère de l’Oural a Krasnoouffimsk, III. U.S.S.R. Geol. Prosp. Bull., xlix, 96–103, pl. i.Google Scholar