Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:29:23.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on the Fauna of the Lower Devonian Beds of Torquay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

F. R. Cowper Reed
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Drevermann has already described and figured this species, and there can be no doubt that the shell from Smugglers' Cove described by Etheridge as ‘O. hipparionix (sic) or striatula’ belongs to it. There are several much better examples in the Sedgwick Museum from Smugglers' Cove, which fully confirm this conclusion. The specimen from Looe, figured by Davidson (op. cit. supra) as O. hipparionyx ? is believed by Drevermann to belong to O. provulvaria, but he does not mention Etheridge's shell from Smugglers' Cove. There is also one imperfect example in the Sedgwick Museum from the New Cut. Williams and Breger consider Schnur's Orthis hipparionyx (non Vanuxem) from Prtim in the Eifel, to be identical with Hall's Schuchertella woolworthana from the Lower Helderberg of New York.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 58 , Issue 7 , July 1921 , pp. 313 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1921

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 313 note 1 Williams, & Breger, , Prof. Paper 89, U.S. Geol. Surv., 1916, pp. 34, 39.Google Scholar

page 313 note 2 Schnur, , Palaeontographica, vol. iii, 1853, p. 217, pl. xl, figs. la–c.Google Scholar

page 313 note 3 Hall, , Tenth Ann. Rep. New York State Cab. Nat. Hist., 1857, p. 48, figs.Google Scholar

page 313 note 4 Sowerby, , Trans. Geol. Soc., ser. II, vol. vi, 1842, p. 409, pl. xxxviii, fig. 12.Google Scholar

page 313 note 5 Kegel, , Abh. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., Heft lxxvi, 1913, p. 101, t. v, fig. 7.Google Scholar

page 313 note 6 Williams, & Breger, , op. cit., 1916, pp. 59, 60.Google Scholar

page 313 note 7 Fuchs, , Abh. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., Heft lxxix, 1915, pp. 8–16.Google Scholar

page 314 note 1 Kayser, , Neues Jahrb. f. Min. Geol., vol. i, 1889, p. 188.Google Scholar

page 314 note 2 Upfield Green, Geol. Mag., Dec. V, Vol. I, 1904, p. 406.Google Scholar

page 314 note 3 D'Arehiac, & de Verneuil, , Bull. Soc. Géol. France, ser. II, vol. ii, 1845, p. 477, pl. xv, fig. 7.Google Scholar

page 314 note 4 Oehlert, , Bull. Soc. Géol. France, ser. III, vol. xxiv, 1896, p. 868.Google Scholar

page 314 note 5 Oehlert, , & Davoust, , Bull. Soc. Géol. France, 3, vol. vii, 1879, p. 708, pl. xiv, fig. 3.Google Scholar

page 314 note 6 Drevermann, , Palœontographica, Bd. xlix, 1902, p. 111, t. xiv, figs. 10, 11.Google Scholar

page 314 note 7 Ibid., p. 112, t. xiv, fig. 12.

page 314 note 8 Clarke, , Mem. 9, U.S. State Mus., 1908, p. 188, pl. xxxv, figs. 15–26.Google Scholar

page 314 note 9 Hall, , Palœont., New York, vol. iv, 1859, p. 85, pl. xi, figs. 5, 11.Google Scholar

page 314 note 10 D'Archiac, , & de Verneuil, , Trans. Geol. Soc., ser. II, vol. vi, 1840, p. 371, pl. xxxvi, fig. 1; Oehlert, Bull. Soc. Géol. France, ser. III, vol. xvii, 1899, p. 776, pl. xix, fig. 8; pl. xxi, fig. 1.Google Scholar

page 314 note 11 Drevermann, , Palœontographica, Bd. 1, 1904, No. 6, p. 271, t. xxxi, figs. 21–6.Google Scholar

page 315 note 1 Ibid., Bd. xlix, 1902, No. 2, p. 111, t. xiv. figs. 10–11.

page 315 note 2 Kegel, , Abh. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., Heft lxxvi, p. 103, t. vi, figs. 1, 2.Google Scholar

page 315 note 3 McCoy, , Syn. Brit. Palœoz. Foss. Woodw. Mus., 1852, p. 386, pl. ii, fig. 7.Google Scholar

page 315 note 4 Davidson, , Mon. Brit. Dev. Brach., vol. iii, 1864, p. 83, pl. xvi, figs. 1–3 (non 4).Google Scholar

page 315 note 5 Drevermann, , Palœontographica, Bd. 1, 1904, p. 273, t. xxxii, figs. 1–4.Google Scholar

page 315 note 6 Béclard, , Bull. Soc. beige Geol. Pal. Hydr., i, 1887, p. 93, t. v, fig. 2.Google Scholar

page 316 note 1 Williams, , & Breger, , Prof. Paper 89, U.S. Geol Surv., 1916, p. 47.Google Scholar

page 316 note 2 Davidson, , Mon. Brit. Dev. Brach., vol. iii, 1864, p. 94.Google Scholar

page 316 note 3 Phillips, , Palœoz. Foss. Dev. Cornw., p. 62, pl. xxv, fig. 104.Google Scholar

page 316 note 4 Kayser, , Abh. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., Heft i, 1889, p. 62, t. vii, figs. 4, 6–8; t. x, fig. 8.Google Scholar

page 316 note 5 Kayser, , Neues Jahrb. f. Min. Geol., vol. i, 1899, p. 188.Google Scholar

page 317 note 1 Whidborne, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. liii, 1897, p. 455, pl. xxxiii, figs. 3–5.Google Scholar

page 317 note 2 Fuchs, , Abh. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., Heft lviii, 1909, p. 57, t. viii, figs. 17, 18; t. ix, Rss. 1–5.Google Scholar

page 317 note 3 Gürich, , Die Leitfossilien, ser. II, Devon, 1909, p. 130, t. xlii, fig. 10.Google Scholar

page 317 note 4 Williams, , & Breger, , op. cit., p. 45, pl. ix, figs. 11, 12, 15, 16, 19; pl. x, figs. 1–3, 5–16, 18–29, 32, 33.Google Scholar

page 317 note 5 Kayser, , Abh. geol. spec. Karte Preuss., Bd. ii, Heft iv, 1878, p. 142.Google Scholar

page 317 note 6 Drevermann, , Palœontographica, Bd. 1, 1904, p. 262.Google Scholar

page 317 note 7 Fuchs, , Abh. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., Heft lviii, 1909, p. 69, t. x, fig. 5.Google Scholar

page 317 note 8 Kayser, , Neues Jahrb. f. Min. Geol., i, 1889, p. 188.Google Scholar

page 318 note 1 Kegel, , Abh. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., Heft lxxvi, 1913, pp. 126–32.Google Scholar

page 318 note 2 Fuchs, , Jahrb. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., 1903, p. 44. t. vi, fig. 1.Google Scholar

page 318 note 3 Kegel, , op. cit., p. 135, t. vi, figs. 14, 15, and references.Google Scholar

page 318 note 4 Clarke, , Mem. New York State. Mus., No. 9, pt. i, 1908, p. 165;Google Scholar Ibid., pt. ii, 1909, p. 81.

page 318 note 5 Hall, , & Clarke, , Palœont. New York., vol. viii, Brach. ii, p. 252.Google Scholar

page 318 note 6 Reed, , Journ. Torquay Nat. Hist. Soc., vol. ii, No. 6, 1920, p. 341.Google Scholar

page 319 note 1 Kegel, , Abk. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., Heft lxxvi, 1913, pp. 126, 127, text-fig. 3; p. 136, t. vi, figs. 16, 17.Google Scholar

page 319 note 2 Kegel, , Abh. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., Heft lxxvi, 1913, pp. 121–31.Google Scholar

page 319 note 3 Fuchs, , Jahrb. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., Bd. xxiv, 1907, p. 50, t. vii, figs. 7–14; t. viii, figs. 1–14; id., Abh. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst. N.F., Heft lviii, 1909, p. 73.Google Scholar

page 319 note 4 Oehlert, , Bull. Soc. Geol. France, ser. III, vol. v, 1877, p. 593, pl.x, fig. 8; id., Bull. Soc. Etudes Sci. Angers, 1885, p. 2, figs. 10–17. Walther, Neues Jahrb. f. Min. Geol., Beil. Bd. xvii, 1903, p. 57, fig. 1.Google Scholar

page 319 note 5 Davidson, , Mon. Brit. Dev. Brach., Suppl. v, 1882, p. 19, pl. i, figs. 20, 20a.Google Scholar

page 319 note 6 Davidson, , id., vol. iii, 1864, p. 10, pl. iv, figs. 5–7.Google Scholar

page 320 note 1 Fuchs, , Jahrb. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., xxxiii, ser II, Heft 1, 1912, p. 62, t. v, figs. 5–8.Google Scholar

page 320 note 2 Kegel, , Abh. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., Heft lxxvi, 1913, pp. 132,139.Google Scholar

page 321 note 1 Hall, , 10th Ann. Rep. New York State Geol., 1891, pp. 91–9, pls. v, vi.Google Scholar

page 321 note 2 Hall, , & Clarke, , Paœont. New York, vol. viii, Brach. ii, pp. 261, 281, pl. lxxviii, figs. 10–16.Google Scholar

page 321 note 3 Gürich, , Die Leitjossilien, Lief, ii, Devon, 1909, p. 148.Google Scholar

page 321 note 4 Drevermann, , Palœontographica, Bd. xlix, 1902, p. 98, t. xii, figs. 7–10.Google Scholar

page 321 note 5 Williams, H. S., Prof. Paper 79, U.S. Geol. Surv., 1913, pp. 36–42, pls. i, ii.Google Scholar

page 321 note 6 Upfield Green, Geol. Mag., Dec. V, Vol. I, 1904, p. 406.Google Scholar

page 322 note 1 Seupin, . Palœont. Abhandl., viii, 1900, p. 19, t. i, figs. 13, 14.Google Scholar

page 322 note 2 Fuchs, , Abh. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., Heft lviii, 1909, pp. 60–3, t. ix, figs. 11–15.Google Scholar

page 322 note 3 Drevermann, , Palœontographica, Bd. 1, 1904, p. 253, t. xxx, figs. 15–19; Seupin, op. cit., p. 12, t. i, figs. 3–5.Google Scholar

page 322 note 4 Seupin, , op. cit., p. 26.Google Scholar

page 322 note 5 Fuchs, , Abh. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., Heft lxxix, 1915, p. 24, t. vi, figs. 2–5.Google Scholar

page 322 note 6 Spriesterbach, ibid., N.F., Heft lxxx, 1915, p. 7, t. ii, 5–8; t. iii, figs. 1–9.

page 322 note 7 , R. and Richter, E., Jahrb. Nassau. Vereins f. Naturk., Jahrg. 72, 1920, pp. 26–38.Google Scholar

page 323 note 1 Roemer, A. (Giebel), Silur. Fauna Unterharz., 1858, p. 29, t. iv, fig. 3.Google Scholar

page 323 note 2 Saupin, , Palœont. Abhandl., Bd. iii, 1900, p. 73, t. vii, figs. 1–3.Google Scholar

page 323 note 3 Drevermann, , Palœontographica, Bd. 1, 1904, p. 252, t. xxix, figs. 15–17.Google Scholar

page 323 note 4 Whidborne, , Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, Vol. VIII, 1901, p. 531, PI. XVII, Fig. 6.Google Scholar

page 323 note 5 Kayser, , Abh. geol. specialK. Preuss., Bd. ii, Heft iv, 1878, p. 165, t. xxii, figs. 1, 2.Google Scholar

page 323 note 6 Scupin, , op. cit., p. 85.Google Scholar

page 323 note 7 Assmann, , Jahrb. k, preuss. geol. Landesanst., 1910, Bd. xxxi, Heft i, p. 138, t. vi, figs. 5–11.Google Scholar

page 323 note 8 Roemer, A. (Giebel), Silur. Fauna Unterharz., 1858, p. 32, t, iv, fig. 1.Google Scholar

page 323 note 9 Oehlert, , Bull. Soc. Geol. France, ser. 3, vol. xvii, 1889, p. 779, pl. xxi, fig. 3.Google Scholar

page 323 note 10 Barrois, , Faune Calc. d'Erbray, Mem. Soc. Geol. Nord, iii, 1889, p. 127 pl. viii, figs. 1, la–f.Google Scholar

page 324 note 1 Upfield Green, Geol. Mag., Dec. V, Vol. I, 1904, p. 406.Google Scholar

page 324 note 2 Béclard, , Bul. Soc. belge Geol. Pal. Hydr., vol. i, 1887, p. 83.Google Scholar

page 324 note 3 Drevermann, , Palœontographica, Bd. I, 1904, p. 256, t. xxx, figs. 13–18.Google Scholar

page 324 note 4 Assmann, , Jahrb. k. preuss. geol Landesanst., xxxi, i, 1910, p. 153, t. xi, figs. 1–5.Google Scholar