Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T05:28:01.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Camarotoechia borealis (von Buch 1834, ex. Schlotheim 1832)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. K. S. St. Joseph
J. K. S. St. Joseph
Affiliation:
Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The name of this species was proposed by Schlotheim (1832, 65, No. 88), but the history of the form really goes back to Linnaeus. The earlier writers on the Scandinavian Palaeozoic took the name Anomia plicatella Linn. (1758, 702) to cover a great number of different ribbed brachiopods, and referred in their synonymies to the form figured in fig. 5, of tab. v, of Linnaeus's Museum Tessinianum (1753), a work published some years before the adoption of binomial nomenclature. When different authors began to subdivide this group, the name plicatella came to be restricted to a species referable to the genus Spirifer, and though some authors, Wahlenberg (1821, 67) and Dalman (1828, 140, Tab. vi, fig. 2), continued to use the name plicatella in a wide sense, so as to include the species under consideration, the latter seems to have come within the range of forms described by Schlotheim (1813, 36) as Terebratulithes lacunosus. This author apparently had the intention of separating a group of ribbed Silurian brachiopods, under the name of Terebratula borealis, for in the catalogue of his collection (Schlotheim, 1832, 65, No. 88) six specimens from the “Uebergangskalkstein” of Sweden are entered under this title. The term, however, remained a nomen nudum until von Buch (1834) gave an adequate description, and it is to this author that the species should correctly be ascribed. He chose as type a specimen from the Encriniten-Übergangskalkstein of Gotland, figured in an earlier work by Schlotheim (1822, 68, Taf. xx, fig. 6a—c) as Anomia Terebrat. lacunosus.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , January 1937 , pp. 33 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LIST OF THE MORE IMPORTANT REFERENCES

von Buch, L., 1834. “Über Terebrateln,” (Kõnig. pr. Akad. Wiss. Abhandl.), Berlin, 67. [Cf. French trans, in Mém. Soc. géol. Fr., iii, 171, pl. xvi, fig. 15.]Google Scholar
Dalman, J. W., 1828. “Uppställning och Beskrifhing af de i Sverige funne Terebratuliter,” K. svenska Vetensk. Akad. Handl. (for 1827), 140, Tab. vi, fig. 2.Google Scholar
Davidson, T., 1869. “British Fossil Brachiopoda,” Palaeontogr. Soc. Lond. [Monogr.], iii, pt. vii, 174–7, pl. xxi, figs. 14–20, 24–27.Google Scholar
Davidson, T., 1883. “British Fossil Brachiopoda,” Palaeontogr. Soc. Lond. [Monogr.], v, pt. ii, 148–9, pl. x, figs. 25, 25a.Google Scholar
Hall, J., and Clarke, J. M., 1894. Palaeontology of New York, viii, pt. ii, 189–191, pl. lvii.Google Scholar
Hisinger, W., 1837. Lethaea Suecica, 80–81, tab. xxiii, fig. 4.Google Scholar
Kiaer, J., 1908. “Das Obersilur im Kristiania-gebiete,” Vidensk. Selsk. Skrifler, Maih.-Naturv. Kl. (1906), ii, passim.Google Scholar
Lindström, G., 1861. “ Bidrag till Kännedomen om Gotlands Brachiopoden,” Öfv. K. Vetensk. Akad. Förhandl., Årg. 17 (for 1860), 349, 352–3, 365, 381.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C, 1758. Systema Naturae, Ed. x, 702. [Ed. xii (1767), 1152.]Google Scholar
Moberg, J. C., and Grönwall, K. A., 1909. “Om Fyledalens Gotlandium,” Acta Univ. Lund., N.F. Afd. 2, Bd. 5, [Medd. Lunds geol. Fältkl., Ser. B (1909), No. 3] 36, Tafl. v, fig. 6.Google Scholar
Munthe, H. et al. , 1925. “Gotlands Geologi,” Sverig. geol. Vnders. Avh., Ser. C, No. 331 (Arsbok 18; 1924), 14–22 passim, Tavl. 2, figs. d1 and d2.Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I., 1854. Siluria, 221, 487, pl. 22, fig. 4 (refigured in 2nd ed.. 3rd ed., 1859, 4th ed. 1867, 5th ed. 1872).Google Scholar
Schlotheim, E., 1813, in Leonhard's Taschenbtich der Mineralogie (Frankfurt am Main), 36.Google Scholar
Schlotheim, E., 1822. Nachträge zur Petrefactenkunde, i, 68, Taf. xx, figs. 6a—c [cf. Id. Petrefactenkunde, 1820, 267–8.]Google Scholar
Schlotheim, E., 1832. Systematisches Verzeichniss der Pet. Sammlung, 65, No. 88.Google Scholar
Soweeby, J. de C., 1839, in Murchison's Silurian System, 624, pl. 12, fig. 10.Google Scholar
Strahan, A. et al. , 1914. “South Wales Coalfield,” Mem. Geol. Surv. Gt. Britain, pt. xi, 90, 94, 100, 105, 111: also Cantrill, T. C., et alii, Silurian System, pt. xii (1916), 57, 66, 72, 75.Google Scholar
TeichertC, C,, 1928. “Stratigraphische u. paläont. Untersuch. im unteren Gotlandium des westlichen Estland, etc.”, N. Jb. Min. Geol. Paläont., lx, Beilage Bd., Abt. B, 66.Google Scholar
Twenhofel, W. H., 1916. “The Silurian and High Ordovician strata of Estonia, Russia, and their faunas,” Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv., lvi, 4, 328, 338.Google Scholar
Wahlenberg, G., 1821. “Petrificata Telluris Svecanae examinata,” Nova Acta Sci. Upsal., viii, 67.Google Scholar