Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T09:41:11.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orders of Validity in Geological Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Edward Greenly
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

All of us have read how, in the infancy of modern geology, men were exceeding liberal of theorizing; indeed, it might almost be said that their theorizing, and their confidence in it, were in inverse proportion to their knowledge. Then arose the Geological Society of London, with its appeal for “new facts” and for “investigating the mineral structure of the Earth”, in other words, for application of the inductive method, and for placing geological inductions upon as broad a basis as possible. The result of which we know; the science went forward from that hour.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 63 , Issue 4 , April 1926 , pp. 174 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I venture to suggest this as a convenient term for the interior of the Earth, within that shell for which we already use the term Lithosphere. We should then have Endosphere and Ectosphere, the latter being divisible into Lithosphere, Hydrosphere, and Atmosphere.

2 If I may venture to offer a suggestion, it would be that none of us would be the worse for mastering Mill's classic work called A System of Logic; or if that be a little too voluminous, the summary of parts of it which is given in Jevons' Elementary Lessons in Logic. But Mill's original is to be recommended.