No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Planktonic biostratigraphic correlation, Californian Early Palaeogene
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0016756800045428/resource/name/firstPage-S0016756800045428a.jpg)
- Type
- Essay Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977
References
Barr, F. T. & Berggren, W. A. 1965. Planktonic foraminifera from the Thanet formation (Paleocene) of Kent, England. Stockh. Contr. Geol. 13, 9–26.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A. 1965. Paleocene – a micropaleontologist's point of view. Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. 49, 1473–84.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A. 1971. Tertiary boundaries and correlations, pp. 693. In Funnell, B. M. and Riedel, W. R., Micropaleontology of Oceans. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A. 1972. A Cenozoic timescale – some implications for regional geology and paleobiogeography. Lethaia 5, 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berggren, W. A. 1974. Late Paleocene – Early Eocene benthonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and paleoecology of Rockall Bank. Micropaleontology 20 (4), 426–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bramlette, M. N. & Sullivan, F. R. 1961. Coccolithophorids and related nannoplankton of the early Tertiary in California. Micropaleontology 7, 129–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brönnimann, P., Stradner, H. & Szöts, E. 1965. Sur les microfossiles planctiques du stratotype du Spilecciano et du Calcaire á Nummulites irregularis de Purga di Bolca. Archives des Sciences 18, 93–102.Google Scholar
Bukry, D. 1973. Low latitude coccolith biostratigraphic zonation. Deep Sea Drilling Project, Initial Reports 15, 685–703.Google Scholar
Hay, W. W. & Mohler, H. P. 1967. Calcareous nannoplankton from Early Tertiary rocks at Pont Labau, France, and Paleocene – Early Eocene correlations. J. Paleont. 41(6), 196–206.Google Scholar
Hay, W. W., Mohler, H. P. et al. , 1967. Calcareous nannoplankton zonation of the Cenozoic of the Gulf Coast and Caribbean–Antillean area and Transoceanic correlation. Trans. Gulf Coast Ass. Geol. Soc. 17, 428–80.Google Scholar
Heinzelin, J. de & Glibert, M. 1957. Lexique Stratigraphique Internationale I (4A) VII.Google Scholar
Lipps, J. H. 1967. Planktonic foraminifera, intercontinental correlation and age of California mid-Cenozoic microfaunal stages. J. Paleont. 41, 994–9.Google Scholar
Lipps, J. H. 1972. California Oligo-Miocene calcareous nannoplankton biostratigraphy and paleoecology, pp. 239–54. In Proc. Pacific Coast Miocene Biostrat. Symp., Pacific Sect., Soc. Econ. Paleont. Mineral. Bakersfield, Calif. (ed. Stinemeyer, E. H.), 364 pp.Google Scholar
Mallory, V. S. 1959. Lower Tertiary Biostratigraphy of the California Coast Ranges, Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol.Google Scholar
Martini, E. 1970. Standard Palaeogene calcareous nannoplankton zonation. Nature, Lond. 226, 500–61.Google Scholar
Renz, H. H. 1948. Stratigraphy and fauna of the Agua Salada Group, State of Falcón, Venezuela. Mem. geol. Soc. Am. 32.Google Scholar
Sadek, A. 1971. Determination of the Upper Paleocene–Lower Eocene boundary by means of calcareous nannofossils. Revista Española de Micropaleontologia 3, 277–82.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. R. 1975. Upper Paleocene–Middle Eocene planktonic biostratigraphy from the Great Valley of California and Adjacent areas, and correlation to the West Coast Microfaunal stages. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol., Soc. Econ. Paleontol. and Mineral, Soc. Explor. Geophys., Pacific Sect., Ann. Mig., pp. 439–55.Google Scholar
Sullivan, F. R. 1964. Lower Tertiary nannoplankton from the California Coast Ranges. Pt. 1. Paleocene. Calif. Univ. Pubs Geol. Sci. 44, 163–228.Google Scholar
Sullivan, F. R. 1965. Lower Tertiary nannoplankton from the Californian Coast Ranges. Pt. 11. Eocene. Calif. Univ. Pubs Geol. Sci. 53, 1–75.Google Scholar