Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T12:26:32.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Status of Sillimanite as an Index of Metamorphic Grade in the Kenya Basement System1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

L. D. Sanders
L. D. Sanders
Affiliation:
Mines and Geological Department, P.O. Box 339, Nairobi, Kenya.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Regional studies using certain minerals as indices of metamprphic grade indicate a coincidence between areas of granitic injection or migmatitization and the distribution of sillimanite. Occurrences of that mineral in knotted bodies or faserkiesel and in pegmatites and aplites within migmatites have, however, sometimes been attributed to late metasomatism rather than to metamorphic conditions. In view of the doubtful value of the mineral as an index of metamorphic grade in these circumstances its distribution in the Kenya Basement System is reviewed and the field relationships between sillimanite-bearing metamorphosed pelitic sediments and faserkiesel migmatites occurring in central Kenya are described.

It is concluded that sillimanite in the migmatites is derived from partly assimilated sillimanite gneisses, which are of extensive but inconspicuous distribution in the non-migmatitized Basement System. The regional stability of sillimanite rather than kyanite over a great area suggests that high-grade metamorphic conditions prevalent in Kenya during Basement System times were accompanied by granitization processes culminating in the local formation of replacive granites in which sillimanite relics are preserved.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 91 , Issue 2 , April 1954 , pp. 144 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Published by permission of the Commissioner of Mines and Geology, Nairobi, Kenya.

References

REFERENCES

Adams, F. D., and Barlow, A. E., 1910. The geology of the Haliburton and Bancroft areas, Province of Ontario. Geol. Surv. Canada.Google Scholar
Barrow, G., 1893. On an Intrusion of Muscovite Biotite Gneiss in the South-Eastern Highlands of Scotland, and its accompanying Metamorphism. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xlix, 330–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, T. F. W., 1936. Structural and Petrologic Studies in Dutchess County, New York, Part II: Petrology and Metamorphism of the Palaeozoic Rocks. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., xlvii, 775–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugge, J., 1945. Geological and petrological investigations in the Kongsberg-Bamble Formation. Norges Geol. Undersokelse, No. 160.Google Scholar
Fowler-Billings, K., 1949. Geology of the Monadnock region of New Hampshire. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., lx, 1249–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, W. Q., 1949. Zones of Progressive Regional Metamorphism in the Moine Schists of the Western Highlands of Scotland. Geol. Mag., lxxxvi, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E., 1949. Structure and Metamorphism of the Keene-Brattleboro Area, New Hampshire-Vermont. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., lx, 1613–1670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, H. H., 1931. The geology of Central Sutherland. Mem. Geol. Surv. Scotland.Google Scholar
Shackleton, R. M., 1946. Geology of the country between Nanyuki and Maralal. Geol. Surv. Kenya Rept., No. 11.Google Scholar
Smith, L. L., 1945. Sillimanite in South Carolina. Econ. Geol., xl, 298–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J., 1948. Late Sillimanite in the Migmatites of Kildonan, Sutherland. Geol. Mag., lxxxv, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, J. V., 1949. Wissahickon schist at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., lx, 1689–1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyckoff, D., 1952. Metamorphic Facies in the Wissahickon schist near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., lxiii, 25–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar