Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T14:03:39.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The accumulation of sediment in the lee of ripples and dunes, and the thickness of bottomset deposits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. R. L. Allen
Affiliation:
Sedimentology Research Laboratory, Department of Geology, The University, Reading.

Summary

The properties of bottomset deposits found in the lee of ripples and dunes formed in water depend on: (i) the diffusion and settling of grains driven over the crest of the sand body and (ii) the redistribution of grains over the bed due to the expenditure of fluid power in the recirculating eddy to the lee of the body. Experiment shows that the rate of grain settling in the lee of a sand body falls off hyperbolically downstream. The bottomset deposits of ripples and dunes also attenuate in thickness downstream, but reach a zero thickness commonly at 4–5 ripple- or dune-heights downstream from the crests. Bottomsets may consist partly or wholly of settled grains, but can also be formed when no sediment settles in the lee of a sand body.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, J. R. L. 1965. Sedimentation in the lee of small underwater sand waves: an experimental study. J. Geol., 73, 95116.Google Scholar
Bagnold, R. A. 1954. The physics of blown sand and desert dunes. 2nd ed., Methuen & Co., London, 265 pp.Google Scholar
Boersma, J. R. 1967. Remarkable types of mega cross-stratification in the fluviatile sequence of a subrecent distributary of the Rhine, Amerongen, The Netherlands. Geologie Mijnb., 46, 217235.Google Scholar
Darwin, G. H. 1884. On the formation of ripple-marks. Proc. R. Soc., 36, 1843.Google Scholar
Guy, H. P., Simons, D. B. & Richardson, E. V. 1966. Summary of alluvial channel data from flume experiments, 1956–61. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv., 462–1, 96 pp.Google Scholar
Johansson, C. F. 1963. Orientation of pebbles in running water: a laboratory study. Geograf. Ann., 45, 85112.Google Scholar
Jopling, A. V. 1961. Origin of regressive ripples explained in terms of fluid-mechanic processes. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv., 424-D, 1517.Google Scholar
Jopling, A. V. 1962. Mechanism of small-scale delta formation: a laboratory study. Proc. 1st Natl. Shallow Water Research Conf., N.S.F., Washington, D.C., 291–5.Google Scholar
Jopling, A. V. 1963a. Hydraulic studies on the origin of bedding. Sedimentology, 2, 115121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jopling, A. V. 1963b. Effect of base-level change on bedding development in a laboratory flume. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv., 475-B, 203–4.Google Scholar
Jopling, A. V. 1964a. Laboratory study of sorting processes related to flow separation. J. geophys. Res., 69, 34033418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jopling, A. V. 1964b. Interpreting the concept of the sedimentation unit. J. sedim. Petrol., 34, 165172.Google Scholar
Jopling, A. V. 1965a. Laboratory study of the distribution of grain sizes in cross-bedded deposits. In Primary sedimentary structures and their hydrodynamic interpretation, ed. Middleton, G. V, S.E.P.M. Spec. Publ. No. 12, 5365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jopling, A. V. 1965b. Hydraulic factors controlling the shape of laboratory deltas. J. sedim. Petrol., 35, 777791.Google Scholar
Jopling, A. V. 1966a. Origin of cross-laminas in a laboratory experiment. J. geophys. Res., 71, 11231133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jopling, A. V. 1966b. Some principles and techniques used in reconstructing the hydraulic parameters of a palaeo-flow regime. J. sedim. Petrol., 36, 549.Google Scholar
Jopling, A. V. 1966c. Some applications of theory and experiment to the study of bedding genesis. Sedimentology, 7, 71102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, E. D. 1957. Flume experiments on production of stratification and cross-stratification. J. sedim. Petrol., 27, 129134.Google Scholar
Raudkivi, A. J. 1963. Study of sediment ripple formation. J. Hydraulics Div., Proc. Am. Soc. Civil Engrs, 89, (No. HY 6), 1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, D. B., Richardson, E. V. & Nordin, C. F. 1965. Sedimentary structures generated by flow in alluvial channels. In Primary sedimentary structures and their hydrodynamic interpretation, ed. Middleton, G. V., S.E.P.M. Spec. Publ., No. 12, 3452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorby, H. C. On the application of quantitative methods to the study of the structure and history of rocks. Q. Jl geol. Soc., Lond., 64, 171233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. G. 1963. Distinctive types of ripple-drift cross-lamination. Sedimentology, 2, 173188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar