Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T00:36:13.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Conodonta - palaeobiology and evolutionary history of a major Palaeozoic chordate group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

M. P. Smith
Affiliation:
Geological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5–7, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldridge, R. J. 1982. A fused cluster of coniform elements from the late Ordovician of Washington Land, western North Greenland. Palaeontology 25, 425–30.Google Scholar
Aldridge, R. J. 1987. Conodont palaeobiology: a historical review. In Palaeobiology of Conodonts (ed. Aldridge, R. J.), pp. 1134. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
Aldridge, R. J., Briggs, D. E. G., Clarkson, E. N. K. & Smith, M. P. 1986. The affinities of conodonts of conodonts – new evidence from the Carboniferous of Edinburgh, Scotland. Lethaia 19, 279–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldridge, R. J., Smith, M. P., Briggs, D. E. G. & Norby, R. D. 1987. The architecture and function of Carboniferous polygnathacean conodont apparatuses. In Palaeobiology of Conodonts (ed. Aldridge, R. J.), pp. 6375. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. R., Sass, D. B. & Poplawski, M. L. S. 1973. Conodont Ultrastructure: the family Panderodontidae Life Sciences Contribution, Royal Ontario Museum no. 90, 36 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barskov, I. S., Moskalenko, T. A. & Starostina, L. P. 1982. New evidence for the vertebrate nature of the conodontophorids. Paleontological Journal 1982, 8290.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G., Clarkson, E. N. K. & Aldridge, R. J. 1983. The conodont animal. Lethaia 16, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, Morris S. 1989. Conodont palaeobiology: recent progress and unsolved problems. Terra Nova 1, 135–50.Google Scholar
Dzik, J. 1987. Chordate affinities of the conodonts. In Problematic Fossil Taxa (ed. Hoffman, A. and Nitecki, M. H.), pp. 240–54. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dzik, J. & Drygant, D. 1986. The apparatus of panderodontid conodonts. Lethaia 19, 133–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fåhræus, L. E. & Hunter, D. R. 1986 (for 1985). The curvature transition series: integral part of some simple-cone conodont apparatuses (Panderodontacea, Distacodontacea, Conodonta). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 30 177–89.Google Scholar
Gans, C. 1989. Stages in the origin of vertebrates: analysis by means of scenarios. Biological Reviews 64, 221–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halstead, L. B. 1969. Calcified tissue in the earliest vertebrates. Calcified Tissue Research 3, 107–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janvier, P. 1981. The phylogeny of the Craniata, with particular reference to the significance of fossil ‘agnathans’. Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology 1, 121–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janvier, P. 1983. L'‘animal-conodonte’ enfin démasqueé? La Recherche 14, 832–3.Google Scholar
Jefferies, R. P. S. 1986. The Ancestry of Vertebrates. London: British Museum (Natural History). 376 pp.Google Scholar
Lindström, M. 1964. Conodonts. Amsterdam, London, New York: Elsevier. 196 pp.Google Scholar
Nicoll, R. S. 1987. Form and function of the Pa element in the conodont animal. In Palaeobiology of Conodonts, (ed. Aldridge, R. J.), pp. 7790. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
Nowlan, G. S. & Carlisle, D. B. 1987. The cephalochordate affinities of conodonts. Canadian Paleontology and Biostratigraphy Seminar, Program and Abstracts, London, Ontario, 7.Google Scholar
Repetski, J. E. & Ethington, R. L. 1983. Rossodus manitouensis (Conodonta), a new Early Ordovician index fossil. Journal of Paleontology 57, 289301.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A.(ed.) 1981. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, W, Miscellanea, Supplement 2, Conodonta. New York and Lawrence: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, pp. W1W202.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H. 1934. Conodonten-Funde in ursprünglichen Zusammenhang. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 16, 7685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, H. W. 1934. The zoological relationships of the conodonts. Journal of Paleontology 8, 448–55.Google Scholar
Scott, H. W. 1942. Conodont assemblages from the Heath formation, Montana. Journal of Paleontology 16, 293300.Google Scholar
Smith, M. P., Briggs, D. E. G. & Aldridge, R. J. 1987. A conodont animal from the lower Silurian of Wisconsin, U.S.A., and the apparatus architecture of panderodontid conodonts. In Palaeobiology of Conodonts (ed. Aldridge, R. J.), pp. 91104. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C. & Schönlaub, H. P. 1975. Conodonts of the genus Oulodus Branson & Mehl, 1933. Geologica et Palaeontologica 9, 4159.Google Scholar
Szaniawski, H. 1987. Preliminary structural comparisons of protoconodont, paraconodont, and euconodont elements. In Palaeobiology of Conodonts (ed. Aldridge, R. J.), pp. 3547. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
Theron, J. N., Rickards, R. B. & Aldridge, R. J. in press. Bedding plane assemblages of Promissum pulchrum Kovács-Endrödy, 1986, a new giant Ashgill conodont from the Table Mountain Group, South Africa. Palaeontology.Google Scholar
Yalden, D. W. 1985. Feeding mechanisms as evidence for cycloastome monophyly. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 84, 291300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar