Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T14:35:57.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contributions to the Petrology of Barnavave, Carlingford, I.F.S.—1. The Junction Hybrids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

S. R. Nockolds
S. R. Nockolds
Affiliation:
Geology Dept., Manchester University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This is the first of a series of contributions dealing with various aspects of the petrology of Barnavave Mountain which have not been touched upon by earlier investigators. The general relationships existing between the various rock types on Barnavave were first described by Traill in 1878, though some of the rock types had been previously dealt with by Haughton. This was followed by the now classical work of Sollas on some of the hybrids occurring on the western side of the mountain. These are at present being redescribed by Dr. G. D. Osborne in a paper which will appear shortly. More recently, the Carlingford area as a whole has been dealt with by Richey and Osborne has described the metamorphosed limestones of the region. Many of the rock types, however, have never been described in detail, if at all, and it is with these that the present contributions are concerned. The author wishes to express his thanks to Prof. W. J. Pugh, Prof. C. E. Tilley and Dr. G. D. Osborne for facilitating the work in various ways, to acknowledge a grant from the Worts fund and a Royal Society grant which defrayed the cost of two of the analyses. The field work was carried out in 1932 but unforeseen circumstances prevented the earlier working up and publication of the results.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 72 , Issue 7 , July 1935 , pp. 289 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 289 note 1 Expl. Mem. for part of One Inch Sheets 60 and 71, Geol. Survey, Ireland, 1878.Google Scholar

page 289 note 2 Haughton, S., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xii, 1856, 192–8.Google Scholar

page 289 note 3 Sollas, W. J., Trans. Roy. Irish Acad., xxx, 1894, 477–510.Google Scholar

page 289 note 4 Richey, J. E., Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, xix, 1931–2, 102.Google Scholar

page 289 note 5 Osborne, G. D., Geol. Mag., LXIX, 1932, 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 290 note 1 Traill, W. A.,48.Google Scholar Ibid.,

page 294 note 1 All modes in this paper were determined on a Leitz integrating stage.Google Scholar

page 294 note 2 Includes a little olivine.Google Scholar

page 297 note 1 Nockolds, S. R., Journ. Geol., xli, 1933, 587.Google Scholar

page 297 note 2 Deer, W. A., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xci, 1935, 54.Google Scholar

page 297 note 3 MacGregor, A. G., Geol. Mag., lxviii, 1931, 506–521, and other references there given.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 298 note 1 Includes a little hornblende.Google Scholar

page 299 note 1 Numbers 1 and 2 have derived material from granulitic and fine-grained ophitic dolerite xenoliths respectively, and their apparently low ratios are greater than the ratios in these xenoliths.Google Scholar

page 302 note 1 Brammall, A., and Harwood, H. F., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxxviii 1932, 219, and other references there given.Google Scholar

page 303 note 1 Harker, A., The Natural History of Igneous Rocks, 1909, p. 357.Google Scholar

page 303 note 2 “Tertiary and Post-Tertiary Geology of Mull,” Mem. Geol. Survey Scot., 924, p. 17.Google Scholar

page 303 note 3 “Geology of Ardnamurchan, etc,” Mem. Geol. Survey Scot., 1930, p. 82.Google Scholar

page 304 note 1 Nockolds, S. R., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xc, 1934, 321.Google Scholar

page 304 note 2 Joplin, G. A., Proc. Linn. Soc. New S. Wales, lviii, 1933, 150.Google Scholar

page 307 note 1 The potash felspar in the exocontaminated rock shows little or no microperthitic intergrowth and so the composition given on page 298 was used for this. The felspar in the endocontaminated type has well developed microperthitic intergrowth, and so the composition of the potash felspar found in the normal granite was used.

page 308 note 1 Phemister, T. C., Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, Sect. 4, xxii, 1928, 133.Google Scholar

page 308 note 2 Phemister, T. C., ibiz., 125–7, 139; Teall, J. J. H., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xi, 1884, 648; Holmes, A., and H. F. Harwood, Min. Mag., xxi, 1926–8, 504; Tyrrell, G. W., Geol. Mag., 12. 5, VI, 1909, 306; Elsden, J. V., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxiv, 1908, 286; Wahl, W., Tscher. Min. Pet. Mitt., xxvi, 1907, 18, 27.Google Scholar

page 309 note 1 Total alkali as Na2O.Google Scholar

page 309 note 2 Tilley, C. E., Geol. Mag., LX, 1923, 417.Google Scholar

page 309 note 3 Warren, B. E., Zeit. Kryst., lxxii, 1930, 493–517.Google Scholar

page 314 note 1 Nockolds, S. R., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xc, 1934, 321.Google Scholar