Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T14:26:44.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dedolomitization of Lower Carboniferous Dolostone in the Wirksworth area, Derbyshire, England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

D. Munn
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, U.K.
D. E. Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, U.K.

Summary

Lower Carboniferous secondary dolostones are shown to be affected by dedolomitization. The crystals of dolomite most affected are those occurring around calcite-filled rhombohedral pores within the dolostones. Dedolomitization of dolomitized crinoid ossicles also occurs. This is thought to be caused by their greater susceptibility to dedolomitization due to dolomicritization. Dedolomitization and subsequent dissolution, giving an enhanced porosity to the dolostones, are believed to be related to the present-day weathering surface.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Hashimi, W. S. & Hemingway, J. E. 1973. Recent dedolomitisation and the origin of the rusty crusts of Northumberland. J. sedim, Petrol. 43 8291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bathurst, R. G. C. 1966. Boring algae, micrite envelopes and lithification of molluscan biosparites. Geol. J. 5 1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braddock, W. A. & Bowles, G. C. 1963. Calcitisation of dolomite by calcium sulphate solutions in the Minnelusa Formation, Black Hills, South Dakota and Wyoming. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv. 475–C, 96–9.Google Scholar
Braun, M. & Friedman, G. M. 1970. Dedolomitisation fabrics in peels: A possible clue to unconformity surfaces. J. sedim, Petrol. 40 417–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Groot, K. 1967. Experimental dedolomitisation. J. sedim. Petrol. 37 12161220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, K. C. 1952. Age-relations of the epigenetic mineral deposits of Britain. Trans. geol. Soc. Glasgow. 21 295429.Google Scholar
Evamy, B. D. 1963. The application of a chemical staining techniques to the study of dedolomitisation. Sedim. 2 164–70.Google Scholar
Evamy, B. D. 1967. Dedolomitisation and the development of rhombohedral pores in limestones. J. sedim. Petrol. 37 12041215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folkman, Y. 1969. Diagenetic dedolomitisation in the Albanian-Cenomanian Yagur dolomite on Mount Carmel Northern Israel. J. sedim. Petrol. 39 380–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, A. 1968. Calcian dolomites and dedolomitisation. Nature, Lond. 217 439–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, A. 1971. Zoned dolomite crystals. J. Geol. 79 3852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucia, F. J. 1961. Dedolomitisation in the Tansill (Permian) Formation. Bull geol. Soc. Am. 72 1107–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neugebauer, J. 1978. Micritisation of crinoids by diagentic dissolution. Sedim. 25 267–83.Google Scholar
Orme, G. R. & Brown, W. W. M. 1963. Diagenetic fabrics in the Avonian Limestones Derbyshire and North Wales. Proc. Yorks. geol. Soc. 34 5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shearman, D. J., Khouri, J. & Taha, S. 1961. On the replacement of dolomite by calcite in some Mesozoic limestones from the French Jura. Proc. Geol. Ass. 72 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Morlot, A. 1847. Upper Dolomit und Sein, Künstliche Darstelling aus Kalkstein. Nat.-sch. Abh. (ed. Haidinger, W.) 1 305–15.Google Scholar
Wolfe, M. J. 1970. Dolomitisation and dedolomitisation in the Cenomanian chalk of Northern Ireland. Geol. Mag. 107 3948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar