Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T17:08:46.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geometrical similarity in successively developed folds and sheath folds in the basement rocks of the northwestern Indian Shield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2010

DEEPAK C. SRIVASTAVA
DEEPAK C. SRIVASTAVA*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, I. I. T. Roorkee, Roorkee-247667 (Uttarakhand), India
*
*E-mail: dpkesfes@iitr.ernet.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An intensely deformed gneiss–migmatite terrane and a relatively undeformed granulite–granitoid terrane constitute the bulk of Precambrian basement in the northwestern Indian Shield. This article traces the structural evolution in the gneiss–migmatite terrane, where traditional methods of structural analysis are difficult to apply, and shows how successively developed folds can assume identical geometry and orientation at an advanced stage of progressive ductile shearing. The gneiss–migmatite terrane exemplifies a regional-scale ductile shear zone that preserves the history of polyphase folding and sheath folding. Geometrical similarity between individual/domain-scale sheath folds and mesoscopic/regional-scale folds implies that sheath folding is common at all scales in the gneiss–migmatite terrane. As the mylonite foliation that traces successive folds is curviplanar, the successively initiated hinge lines were curvilinear from their inception in the shear zone. At the advanced stage of ductile shearing, the hinge line curvatures were accentuated due to their rotation towards subvertically directed maximum stretching (X), and variably oriented fold axial planes were brought into approximate parallelism with the upright principal plane (XY) of the bulk strain ellipsoid. Eventually all the folds, irrespective of their relative order of development, became strongly non-cylindrical, extremely tight, isoclinal and approximately co-planar with respect to each other. It is due to the above geometrical modifications during ductile shearing that folds, irrespective of their order of development, now appear identical with respect to isoclinal geometry, axial plane orientation and hinge line curvilinearity. Evidence from the fold orientations, the deformed lineation patterns and the sheath fold geometry suggest that the shearing occurred in a general shear type of bulk strain, and NNW–SSE-directed subhorizontal compression resulted in subvertically directed stretching in the gneiss–migmatite terrane.

Keywords

ductile shear zonesinterference patternsheath foldsdeformed lineationsmylonite
Type
Original Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 148 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 171 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alsop, G. I. & Carreras, J. 2007. The structural evolution of sheath folds: a case study from Cap de Creus. Journal of Structural Geology 29, 1915–30.Google Scholar
Alsop, G. I. & Holdsworth, R. E. 1999. Vergence and facing patterns in large-scale sheath folds. Journal of Structural Geology 21, 1335–49.Google Scholar
Alsop, G. I. & Holdsworth, R. E. 2004 a. The geometry and topology of natural sheath folds: a new tool for structural analysis. Journal of Structural Geology 26, 1561–89.Google Scholar
Alsop, G. I. & Holdsworth, R. E. 2004 b. Shear zone folds: records of flow perturbation or structural inheritance? In Flow Processes in Faults and Shear Zones (eds Alsop, G. I., Holdsworth, R. E., McCaffrey, K. J. W. & Hand, M.), pp. 177–99. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 224.Google Scholar
Alsop, G. I. & Holdsworth, R. E. 2006. Sheath folds as discriminators of bulk strain type. Journal of Structural Geology 28, 1588–606.Google Scholar
Alsop, G. I. & Holdsworth, R. E. 2007. Flow perturbation folding in shear zones. In Deformation of the Continental Crust: The Legacy of Mike Coward (eds Ries, A. C., Butler, R. W. H. & Graham, R. D.), pp. 77–103. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 272.Google Scholar
Alsop, G. I., Holdsworth, R. E. & McCaffrey, K. J. W. 2007. Scale invariant sheath folds in salt, sediments and shear zones. Journal of Structural Geology 29, 1585–604.Google Scholar
Carreras, J., Estrada, A. & White, S. 1977. The effects of folding on c-axis fabric of quartz mylonite. Tectonophysics 39, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbold, P. R. & Quinquis, H. 1980. Development of sheath folds in shear regimes. Journal of Structural Geology 2, 119–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escher, A. & Watterson, J. 1974. Stretching fabrics, folds and crustal shortening. Tectonophysics 22, 223–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, M. 1985. Microtectonic evidence for eastward ductile shear in the Jurassic orogen of SW Japan. Journal of Structural Geology 7, 175–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, A. & Kalioubi, E. 2002. The migif-Hafafit gneissic complex of the Egyptian desert: fold interference patterns involving multiply deformed sheath folds. Tectonophysics 346, 247–75.Google Scholar
Ghosh, S. K. & Ramberg, H. 1968. Buckling experiments on intersecting fold patterns. Tectonophysics 5, 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, S. K. & Sengupta, S. 1987. Progressive evolution of structures in a ductile shear zone. Journal of Structural Geology 9, 277–87.Google Scholar
Ghosh, S. K., Hazra, S. & Sengupta, S. 1999. Planar, non-planar and refolded sheath folds in the Phulad shear zone, Rajasthan, India. Journal of Structural Geology 21, 1715–29.Google Scholar
Goscombe, B. 1991. Intense non-coaxial shear and the development of mega-scale sheath folds in the Arunta Block, Central Australia. Journal of Structural Geology 13, 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. R. 1981. Structural analysis of sheath folds with horizontal X-axes, northeast Canada. Journal of Structural Geology 3, 203–10.Google Scholar
Heron, A. M. 1953. The geology of central Rajputana. Geological Survey of India Memoir 79, 389 pp.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, R. E. 1990. Progressive deformation structures associated with ductile thrusts in the Moine Nappe, Sutherland, N. Scotland. Journal of Structural Geology 12, 443–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacassin, R. & Mattauer, M. 1985. Kilometre-scale sheath fold at Mattmark and implications for transport direction in the Alps. Nature 315, 739–42.Google Scholar
Marques, F. O., Guerreiro, S. M. & Fernandes, A. R. 2008. Sheath fold development with viscosity contrast: analogue experiments in bulk simple shear. Journal of Structural Geology 30, 1348–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mawer, C. K. & Williams, P. F. 1991. Progressive refolding and foliation development in a sheared, coticule-bearing phyllite. Journal of Structural Geology 13, 539–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mies, W. 1993. Structural-analysis of sheath folds in the Sylacauga-marble-Group, Talladega slate belt, southern Appalachians. Journal of Structural Geology 15, 983–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minnigh, L. D. 1979. Structural analysis of sheath folds in a meta-chert from the Western Italian Alps. Journal of Structural Geology 1, 275–88.Google Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, D. K., Bhadra, B. K., Ghosh, T. K. & Srivastava, D. C. 1997. Development of compressional and extensional structures during progressive ductile shearing in the Main Central Thrust, Lesser Himachal Himalaya. In Evolution of Geological Structures in Micro- to Macro-Scales (ed. Sengupta, S.), pp. 203–17. London: Chapman and Hall Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, D. & Dasgupta, S. 1978. Delhi-pre-Delhi relations near Badnor. Indian Journal of Earth Sciences 5, 183–90.Google Scholar
Naha, K. & Mohanty, S. P. 1990. Structural studies in the pre-Vindhyan rocks of Rajasthan: a summary of work of the last three decades. Proceedings Indian Academy of Sciences 99, 279–90.Google Scholar
Platt, J. P. 1983. Progressive refolding in ductile shear zones. Journal of Structural Geology 5, 619–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyne, T. K. & Bandopadhyay, A. 1985. Structure of Banded Gneissic Complex at and around Bandanwara, Ajmer district, Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Earth Science 12, 9–20.Google Scholar
Quinquis, H., Audren, C., Brun, J. P. & Cobbold, P. R. 1978. Intense progressive shear in Ile de Grouix blueschists and compatibility with subduction or obduction. Nature 274, 43–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. G. 1967. Folding and Fracturing of Rocks. New York: McGraw Hill, 568 pp.Google Scholar
Ramsay, J. G. 1980. Shear zone geometry, a review. Journal of Structural Geology 2, 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. G. & Huber, M. I. 1983. The Techniques of Modern Structural Geology. Vol. 1: Strain Analysis. London: Academic Press, pp. 1–308.Google Scholar
Ramsay, J. G. & Huber, M. I. 1987. The Techniques of Modern Structural Geology. Vol. 2: Folds and Fractures. London: Academic Press, pp. 309–700.Google Scholar
Rhodes, S. & Gayer, R. A. 1977. Non-cylindrical folds, linear structures in the X direction and mylonite development during translation of the Caledonian Kalak nappe Complex of Finnmark. Geological Magazine 115, 329–41.Google Scholar
Roy, A. B., Somani, M. K. & Sharma, N. K. 1981. Aravalli-pre-Aravalli relationship: a study from the Bhindar region, southern Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Earth Sciences 8, 119–30.Google Scholar
Searle, M. P. & Alsop, G. I. 2007. Eye-to-eye with a mega-sheath fold: a case study from Wadi Mayh, northern Oman Mountains. Geology 35, 1043–6.Google Scholar
Sharma, R. S. 1977. Deformation and crystallization history of the Precambrian rocks in north central Rajasthan, India. Precambrian Research 4, 133–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, R. S. & Upadhyay, T. P. 1975. Multiple deformation in the Precambrian rocks to the southeast of Ajmer, Rajasthan, India. Journal of the Geological Society of India 16, 428–40.Google Scholar
Sinha-Roy, S., Malhotra, G. & Mohanty, M. 1998. Geology of Rajasthan. Bangalore: Geological Society of India, 278 pp.Google Scholar
Srivastava, D. C. 2001. Deformation pattern in the Precambrian basement around Masuda, central Rajasthan. Journal of the Geological Society of India 57, 197–222.Google Scholar
Srivastava, D. C., Yadav, A. K., Nag, S. & Pradhan, A. K. 1995. Deformation style of the Banded Gneissic Complex in Rajasthan: a critical evaluation. In Continental Crust of Northwestern and Central India (eds Sinha-Roy, S. & Gupta, K. R.), pp. 199–216. Geological Society of India Memoir no. 31.Google Scholar
Turner, F. J. & Weiss, L. E. 1963. Structural Analysis of Metamorphic Tectonites. McGraw Hill, 545 pp.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Srivastava supplementary material

Figure 3.tif

Download Srivastava supplementary material(Image)
Image 10.9 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Srivastava supplementary material

Figure 4.tif

Download Srivastava supplementary material(Image)
Image 8 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Srivastava supplementary material

Figure 5.tif

Download Srivastava supplementary material(Image)
Image 6.3 MB