Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-22T03:22:28.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Idea of Contrasted Differentiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Arthur Holmes
Arthur Holmes
Affiliation:
Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 74 , Issue 4 , April 1937 , pp. 189 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1937

References

1.—Nockolds, S. R.. “The Production of Normal Rock Types by Contamination and their Bearing on Petrogenesis,” GEOL. MAG., LXXI, 1934, 31–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.—Holmes, A.. “The Idea of Contrasted Differentiation,” GEOL. MAG., LXXIII, 1936, 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.—Nockolds, S. R.. “The Idea of Contrasted Differentiation: A Reply,” GEOL. MAG., LXXIII, 1936, 529–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.—Sorochmsky, C.. “Étude pétrographique de l'édifice volcanique du Kahusi et du Biega (Kivu). (Mission géol. Com. Nat. de Kivu),” Mem. Inst. geol. Univ. Louvain, ix (vi), 1934, 98 pp.Google Scholar
5.—Reynolds, Doris L.. “Demonstrations in petrogenesis from Kiloran Bay, Colonsay. I: The transfusion of quartzite,” Min. Mag., xxiv, 1936, 367–407.Google Scholar
6.—Holmes, A.. “Transfusion of quartz xenoliths in alkali basic and ultrabasic lavas, South-West Uganda,” Min. Mag., xxiv, 1936, 408–421.Google Scholar
7.—Bowen, N. L. and Schairer, J. F.. “The Problem of the Intrusion of Dunite in the Light of the Olivine Diagram,” Rep. XVI Internat. Geol. Cong. Washington, 1933, 1936, 391–396.Google Scholar
8.—Flett, J. S. in “The Geology of Caithness,” Mem. Geol. Surv. Scotland, 1913, 113.Google Scholar
9.—Campbell, R., Day, T. C., and Stenhouse, A. G.. “The Braefoot Outer Sill, Fife. Part I: The Braefoot Promontory,” Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., xii, 1931, 360.Google Scholar