Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:42:52.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

III.—Upper Cretaceous Terebelloids from England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

The tubes formed of fish-debris, found throughout the Chalk of England, described by Mantell (1822) as Murœna(?) lewesiensis, referred by L. Agassiz (1844) to Dercetis elongatus, and placed among Annelida Tubicola as Terebella lewesiensis by William Davies (1879), are here described with more precise detail and retained in the position assigned to them by Davies. A diagnosis is provided and a holotype selected.

A specimen from the Gault, of similar nature but larger, is made the type of a new species, ‘Terebella’ lutensis (Fig. 6).

Similar tubes from the Cenomanian, built of Conifer debris and Echinoderm debris, are described, and the question whether these differences of composition indicate a difference of species is discussed, but left open for the evidence of further material. Such tubes may for the present be known as ‘Terebella’ cf. lewesiensis (Figs. 7, 8).

Tubes without extraneous building material and with a cancellar ornament are also found in the Cretaceous rocks of England, and some were referred to Terebella lewesiensis by Davies. All those from the Chalk are here separated as ‘Terebella’ cancellata, n.sp. (Figs. 3–5).

Two tubes made of mud bricks are discussed. One, apparently of Lower Cenomanian age, is referred to the rather doubtful genus Keckia (Fig. 1). The other, from the Gault, is referred to Granularia (Fig. 2). Both these genera are held to be of Annelid origin.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 550 note 1 See Macé, E., “De la structure du tube des Sabelles”: Arch. Zool. Expér., vol. x, Notes, pp. ix–xiv, especially p. x, 1882.Google Scholar

page 553 note 1 See references in my note “Some Fossil Annelid Burrows”, GEOL. MAG., 03, 1910, pp. 114–16.Google Scholar