Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T03:48:44.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

I.—Some Additions to the Australian Tertiary Echinoidea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. Walter Gregory*
Affiliation:
British Museum (Nat. Hist.).

Extract

The Tertiary Echinoid fauna from the South-east of Australia is well known from the work of Duncan, Laube, R. Etheridge, jun., and M‘Coy. A collection made by H. P. Woodward, Esq., F.G.S., from the Tertiary beds of Willunga near Adelaide, enables several additions to be made. These are of interest as they considerably strengthen the Cretaceous facies which the fauna owes to the presence of such genera as Holaster and Micraster, and as they throw some additional light upon a genus the stability of which has long been questioned. The collection has been presented to the British Museum (Nat. Hist.) by H. Y. L. Brown, Esq., F.G.S., the Government Geologist for South Australia.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1890

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 481 note 1 Duncan, P. M., “A Description of some Fossil Corals and Echinoderms from the South Australian Tertiaries,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (3) vol. xiv. pp. 161–8Google Scholar, pls. v. and vi. On the Echinodermata of the Australian Cainozoic (Tertiary) Deposits,” Q.J.G.S. xxxiii. 1877, pp 4273 Google Scholar, pl. iii. and iv. A Revision of the Echinoidea from the Australian Tertiaries,” Q.J.G.S. xliii. 1887, pp. 411430.Google Scholar

page 481 note 2 Laube, G. C., “Ueber einige fossile Echiniden von den Murray Cliffs in Süd-Australien,” Sitz. k. Ak. Wiss. Wien. lix. Abth. i. 1869, pp. 183–98Google Scholar.

page 481 note 3 Etheridge, R., jun., “Description of a New Species of the Genus Hemipatagus, Desor, from Tertiary Rocks of Victoria, Australia; with Notes on some previously described Species from S. Australia,” Q J.G.S. 1875, pp. 444–50, pl. xxiCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 481 note 4 M‘Coy, F., Prod. Pal. Victoria, dec. vi. 1879 Google Scholar, vii. 1882.

page 482 note 1 Conrad, T. A., Journ. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil. [2] iv. p. 291 Google Scholar, pl. xlvii. fig. 19.

page 484 note 1 von Fritsch, K., “Die Echiniden der Nummuliten-Bildungen vou Borneo,” Palæontographica, Supp. III. 1. 1, Hft. 2, 1877, p. 89 Google Scholar, pl. xiii. figs. 2 and 3.

page 485 note 1 Tenison-Woods, J. E., Geol. Obs. in South Australia, 1862, p. 77.Google Scholar

page 485 note 2 Woodward, Samuel, Geology of Norfolk, 1833, p. 50 Google Scholar, pl. v. fig. 6.

page 485 note 3 von Zittel, , Handbuch der Palaeontologie, i. 1889, p. 541 Google Scholar.

page 485 note 4 Journ. Linn. Soc. Zool. xxiii. 1889, pp. 221–2Google Scholar.

page 486 note 1 Hutton, F. W., “On the Correlations of the ‘Curiosity-Shop Bed,’ in Canterbury, New Zealand,” Q J.G.S. 1885, vol. xli. p. 554 Google Scholar.

page 486 note 2 The sections at this point have been fully described by ProfTate, in his “Xotes on the Physical and Geological Features of the Lower Murray River,” Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Australia, 1885, vol. vii. p. 35.Google Scholar

page 488 note 1 Agassiz, and Desor, , Catalogue raisonné, pt. 3, Ann. Sci. nat. (3) viii. 1847, p. 16.Google Scholar

page 488 note 2 Agassiz, and Desor, , op. cit. p. 17.Google Scholar

page 488 note 3 De Loriol. Faune crétacique du Portugal, Echinodermes, II. fasc. 2, Lisbon, , 1888, pp. 103–4, pl xx. figs. 1–3.Google Scholar

page 489 note 1 Hutton, F. W., Cat. Tert. Mollusca and Echinodermata of New Zealand, New Zealand Geol. Surv., Miscell. Publications, No. IX. 1873, p. 42.Google Scholar Hector, , Cat. of Geol. Exhibits, New Zealand Court, India and Colonies Exhibition, London, 1886, p. 54, fig. 1.Google Scholar

page 489 note 2 Brown, H. Y. L., “Report of Country passed over from Port Augusta to Eucla,” Adelaide, 1885.Google Scholar

page 490 note 1 Tate, , “Notes on the Correlations of the Coral-bearing Strata of South Australia,” Trans. Roy. Soc. South Australia, vol. i. 1878, pp. 120–3.Google Scholar

page 490 note 2 K. von Zittel, “Neue Mollusken und Echinodermen aus Neu-Seeland,” Novara Reise, Palaeontologie.

page 490 note 3 Hutton, F. W., “Catalogue of the Tertiary Mollusca and Echinodermata of New Zealand,” New Zealand Geol. Soc, Miscell. Public. ix. 1873.Google Scholar

page 490 note 4 Duncan, P. M., “On the Fossil Corals of the Australian Tertiary Deposits,” Q.J.G.S. xxvi. 1870, p. 315.Google Scholar

page 491 note 1 Hutton, F. W., Q.J G.S. xli. 1885, pp. 558–64.Google Scholar

page 491 note 2 On some Fossils lately obtained from the Cobden Limestone at Greymouth,” Trans. N. Zealand Inst. xx. 1888, pp. 267–9.Google Scholar

page 491 note 3 Tate, , “Census of the Fauna of the Older Tertiary of Australia,” Journ. R. Soc. N. S. Wales, xxii. 1888, pp. 242.Google Scholar

page 491 note 4 Dennant, J., “Notes on the Muddy Creek Beds, with Brief Remarks on other Tertiary Strata of S. Western Victoria,” Trans. R. Soc. S. Australia, vol. xi. 1889, pp. 53–4Google Scholar.