Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T01:24:29.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IV.—Hamster Remains from the Norfolk Forest Bed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

E. T. Newton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mr. A. Savin, of Cromer, has been kind enough to send me for examination a large number of small vertebrate remains which he has recently collected from the Upper Freshwater Bed of the Norfolk Forest Bed Series at West Runton. Among these there is one little specimen which deserves to be recorded, as it represents a genus not hitherto recognized in the ‘Forest Bed’. The specimen is a right maxilla with three grinders in place, indubitably belonging to the genus Cricetus; in size it is distinctly larger than the common Hamster Cricetus vulgaris (= C. frumentarius), which is the largest species of the genus living at the present day. Only once before has Cricetus been recognized in Britain, W. A. Sanford having identified from the Hutton Cave, Mendip Hills, remains of a small mouse-like species which he referred to Cricetus songarus.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , March 1909 , pp. 110 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1909

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 110 note 1 Sanford, W. A., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 1870, vol. xxvi, p. 128Google Scholar, and Proc. Somersets. Nat. Hist. Soc., 1870, vol. xv, p. 56Google Scholar.

page 111 note 1 I am pleased to have this opportunity of thanking the officers in charge at both these institutions for the courteous assistance so kindly rendered on this as on many other occasions.

page 111 note 2 “Ueber pleistocäne Hamster-Reste aus Mittel-und Westeuropa”: Jahrb. k. k. geol. Reichsanst., 1893, Band xliii, Heft ii, p. 179Google Scholar.

page 112 note 1 “Les Animaux pliocènes du Roussillon”: Mém. Soc. Géol. France, 1890, vol. i, Mém. No. 3, p. 54Google Scholar.

page 112 note 2 See also DrWoldřich, , “Uebersicht der Wirblethierefauna des Böhmisehen Massivs während der anthropozoischen Epoche”: Jahrb. k.k. geol. Reichsanst., 1897, Band xlvii, p. 393Google Scholar.

page 112 note 3 See note 2, p. 111.

page 112 note 4 “Diluviale Fauna von Zuzlawitz bei Winterberg im Böhmerwalde”: Sitzb. d. k. Akad. d. Wiss. in Wien, 1880, Band lxxxii, p. 30Google Scholar.

page 112 note 5 Kafke, J.,“Recente und Fossile Nagethiere Böhems”: Arch. Landesdf. Böhem, 1893, vol. viii, No. 5Google Scholar.

page 112 note 6 Nüescn, J., “Das Schweizersbild, eine Niederlassung aus paläolithischer und neolithischer Zeit”: Denkschr. schweiz. Gesellsch. Naturw., 1896, Band xxxv, pp. 1–334Google Scholar.

page 112 note 7 DrNehring, A., “Ueber die pleistocäne Fauna der Belgischen Hölen”: Sitz. Gesellsch. Naturf. Freunde, Berlin, 1897, p. 74Google Scholar.

page 113 note 1 “The Mammalian Fauna of the Forest Bed”: Geol. Mag., 1908, p. 329.