Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident Due to planned maintenance there will be periods of time where the website may be unavailable. We apologise for any inconvenience.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
One of us remarked last year in an article in Science Progress that “we may expect to find our Carboniferous deposits divisible into zones in a manner comparable with that which holds good among other … strata.” The same writer called attention to the fact that similar views had been expressed by Waagen (Salt Range Fossils, “Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, 1891”), who considered that the Carboniferous fossils had not received the same attention as those of other rocks.
1 For further details concerning this section, see Garwood, in “History of Northumberland,” by Bateson, E., vol.ii, p. 330.Google Scholar
