Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T12:38:06.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metasomatism in the Whin Sill of the North of England. Part I: Metasomatism by Lead Vein Solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

L. R. Wager
L. R. Wager
Affiliation:
Pembroke College, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The products of the metasomatism of igneous rocks are found for the most part only in small quantities since diffusion through a solid rock of the solutions responsible for metasomatic changes is a slow process. In the Whin Sill there are two types of metasomatic alteration product which though insignificant in total amount are nevertheless widely distributed. The first type, which was formed along the walls of an early joint system by the action of juvenile solutions, is part of the history of the cooling down of the Whin Sill and will be described in a subsequent paper. The second type was produced by the action of lead vein solutions. Although unconnected with any stage in the cooling down of the Whin Sill, this type has an important bearing on the general mechanism of replacement and especially on the part played by diffusion, whose effects may be seen in both types as an extended transition between altered and unaltered dolerite.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , March 1929 , pp. 97 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1: 1884. Teall, J. J. H. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xl, pp. 640–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2: 1888. Stecher, E. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., vol. xv, pp. 160–72.Google Scholar
3: 1898. Reynolds, W. C. Tr. Chem., Soc., vol. lxxiii, pp. 262–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4: 1903. Milch, L. Centralbl. f. Min., vol. iv, pp. 505–9.Google Scholar
5: 1910. Finlayson, A. M. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lxvi, pp. 299–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6: 1910. Flett, J. S., in “The Geology of the Neighbourhood of Edinburgh,” Mem. Geol. Surv. Scotland, pp. 311–13.Google Scholar
7: 1910. Heslop, M. K., and Smythe, J. H. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lxvi, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8: 1911. Ransome, F. L. U.S. Geol. Sure. Prof. Paper 75.Google Scholar
9: 1916. Stephenson, E. A. Journ. Geol., vol. xxiv, pp. 180–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10: 1918. Lindgren, . Journ. Geol., vol. xxvi, pp. 542–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11: 1921. Holmes, A., and Smith, S. Geol. Mag., Vol. LVIII, pp. 440–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12: 1922. Goldschmidt, V. M. Econ. Geol., vol. xvii, pp. 105–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13: 1923. Smith, S. Mem. Geol. Surv. Gr. Br., Min. Res., xxv.Google Scholar
14: 1923. Mellor, J. W. A Comprehensive Treatise on Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, London, vol. iii, p. 832; vol. iv, p. 359.Google Scholar
15: 1926. Boydell, H. C. Econ. Geol., vol. xxi, pp. 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16: 1928. Holmes, A., and Harwood, H. F. Min. Mag., vol. xxi, No. 122, pp. 493–542.Google Scholar