Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T01:23:33.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methods and applications of fracture trace analysis in the quantification of structural geology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. F. Huntington
J. F. Huntington
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Royal School of Mines, Prince Consort Road, London, S.W.7.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Naturally occurring linear features recognisable on aerial photographs may be related to bedrock tectonics. The identification and analysis of such linear elements, “megajoints”, reveals much information about the style and dimensions of subsurface geologic structures. Various terminologies, as applicable to air photo linears, are brought together and analysis is carried out in four test applications of Permyakov's original methods, the calculation of three-dimensional parameters from two-dimensional data. Some comparison is made with other techniques. Much of this linear vector analysis is carried out manually but possibilities exist for mechanical analysis and synthesis using certain up-to-date techniques. The methods described are applicable to many fields of academic and practical geology at or above the reconnaissance level.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 106 , Issue 5 , October 1969 , pp. 430 - 451
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Society of Photogrammetry. 1934. Manual of Photographic Interpretation. (See pp. 169–342.)Google Scholar
Blanchet, P. H. 1957. Development of fracture trace analysis as exploration method. Bull. Am, Ass. Petrol. Geol., 41, (8), 1748–1759.Google Scholar
De Sitter, L. V. 1956. Structural Geology. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Filosofov, V. P. 1960. [Short Manual of geomorphometric method in search for tectonic structures]. Saratov University Press. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Gol'braykh, I. G., Mirkin, G. R., & Zabaluyer, V. V. 1966. Tectonic Analysis of megajointing. Int. geol. Rev., 8, 1009–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, P. V. 1965. Analysis of variable density seismograms by means of optical diffraction. Geophysics, 30, (1), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattman, L. H. 1958. Technique of mapping geological traces and lineaments on aerial photographs. Photo. Gramm. Eng., 24, 568–576.Google Scholar
Nishimura, E. 1950. On Earth Tides. Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 31, (3), 357–376.Google Scholar
Permyakov, Ye. N. 1949. [Tectonic Jointing of the Russian Platform]. MOIP Publications. No. 12, (16). (In Russian).Google Scholar
Pincus, H. J. 1953. The Analysis of aggregates of orientation data in the Earth Sciences. J. Geol., 61, 482–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincus, H. J. 1956. Some vector and arithmetic operations on two dimensional orientation variates with applications to geological data. J. Geol., 64, 533–557.sCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincus, H. J., & Dobrin, M. B. 1966. Geological applications of optical data processing. J. geophys. Res., 71, (20), 4861–4869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar