Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T17:56:38.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on Astiericeras astierianum (d'Orbigny, 1842) (Cretaceous Ammonoidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. J. Kennedy
W. J. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Geological Collections, University Museum, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Astiericeras astierianum (d'orbigny, 1842) is redescribed, the type material illustrated for the first time and the range of intraspecific variation and striking sexualdimorphism documented. Previous suggestions that the early ontogeny of Astiericeras supports derivation from Douvilleiceras de Grossouvre, 1894 of the Douvilleiceratinae are in error: the genus and species are distinctive at the earliest diameters seen and ornament gives no clue to affinities. The sutural formula is that characteristic of some Douvilleicerataceae, however, to which superfamily the species is assigned, as the only member of the family Astiericeratidae Breistroffer, 1953. It is thus a scaphitoid heteromorph, derived from normally coiled immediate ancestors that are themselves recoiled derivatives of an original heteromorphic stock.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 123 , Issue 5 , September 1986 , pp. 507 - 513
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Breistroffer, M. 1953. In Breistroffer, M. & de Villoutreys, O. Les ammonites Albien de Peille (Alpes-Maritimes). Travaux du Laboratoire de Géologie de la Faculté des Sciences de l'Université Grenoble 30, 69–74.Google Scholar
Casey, R. 1961. A monograph of the Ammonoidea of the Lower Greensand. Palaeontographical Society Monographs Part 3, pp. 119–216, pls. 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, R. 1962. A monograph of the Ammonoidea of the Lower Greensand. Palaeontographical Society Monographs Part 4, 217–88, pls. 36–42.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1969. The late Cretaceous ammonites Scaphites leei Reeside and Scaphites hippocrepis (DeKay) in the Western Interior of the United States. Geological Survey Professional Paper 619, 27 pp., 5 pls.Google Scholar
Colleté, C., Destombes, P., Fricot, C. & Pietresson, De Saint Aubin, J. 1982. Les Fossiles de l'Albien de l'Aube. 100 pp., 30 pls. Troyes: Association Géologique Auboise.Google Scholar
Collignon, M. 1949. Recherches sur les faunes Albiennes de Madagascar. 1. L'Albien d' Ambarimaninga. Annales géologiques du Service des Mines. Madagascar 16, 128 pp., 22 pls.Google Scholar
Destombes, P. 1979. Les ammonites de l'Albien Inférieur et Moyen dans le stratotype de l'Albien: gisements, paléontologie, biozonation. In Les Stratotypes Françaises. 5, L'Albien de l'Aube, pp. 51–193, pls. 4.1–4.27. Paris: CNRS, 446 pp.Google Scholar
Etayo-Serna, F. 1979. Zonation of the Cretaceous of central Colombia by Ammonites. Publicaciones Geologicas Especiales del Ingeominas. Bogota 2, 186 pp., 18 pls.Google Scholar
Grossouvre, A. DE. 1894. Recherches sur la Craie supérieure, 2: Paléontologie. Les ammonites de la craie supérieure. Mémoires pour Servir à l'éxplication de la Carte Géologique Détaillée de la France 264 pp., 39 pls. (misdated 1893).Google Scholar
Kullmann, J. & Wiedmann, J. 1970. Significance of sutures in phylogeny of Ammonoidea. Paleontological Contributions. University of Kansas 47, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Kvantaliani, I. V. 1968. [The new genus Chaschupseceras from the Clansayesian deposits in Western Abkhaziya.] Trudy Gruzin Politekhni Instituta 2 (122), 62–71 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Kvantaliani, I. V. & Sharikadze, M. Z. 1983. [The genus Chaschupseceras (Ammonoidea), its specific composition and systematic position.] Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal 17, 39–44, pl. 4 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Luppov, N. P. In Luppov, N. P. & Drushchitz, V. V. (ed.) 1958. [Mollusca-Cephalopoda. II. Ammonoidea (Ceratities and Ammonites) and Endocochlia.] In Orlov, Y. A. (ed.) [Fundamentals of Palaeontology. A Guide for Palaeontologists and Geologists of the U.S.S.R.] 6, 359 pp. 78 pls. Moscow: Gosu-Oarstvennoye Nauchno-Tecknicheskoye Izdatel'stvo Literatury po Geologii i Okhrane Nedr [in Russian].Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. D'. 1840–1842. ‘Paléontologie française; Terrains crétacés. 1, Céphalopodes, 1–120 (1840); 121–430 (1841); 431–662 (1842), 151 pls. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. D'. 1850. Prodrome de Paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques et rayonnés. 2, 428 pp. Paris: Masson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parona, C. F. & Bonarelli, G. 1897. Fossili Albiani d'escragnolles, del Nizzardo e della Liguria occidentale. Palaeontographica Italica 2, 53–107 (1–55), pls. 10–14 (1–5) (1896).Google Scholar
Pictet, F. J. & Campiche, G. 1861–1864. Déscription des fossiles du terrain crétacé des environs de Sainte-Croix, II. Matériaux pour la Paléontologie de la Suisse 3e sér., 2, 752 pp., pls. 44–98.Google Scholar
Quenstedt, F. A. von. 1845–1849. Petrefaktenkünde Deutschlands. 1, Cephalopoden. 580 pp., 36 pls. Pp. 1–104 (1845); 105–184 (1846); 185–264 (1847); 265–472 (1848); 473–580 (1849). Tübingen: Ludwig Friedrich Fues.Google Scholar
Roman, F. 1938. Les ammonites jurassiques et Crétacées: Essai de genera. 554 pp., 53 pls. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Schindewolf, O. 1967. Studien zur Stammesgeschichte der Ammoniten. VI. Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur in Mainz, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse 1966, 723–808.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1923. A monograph of the ammonoidea of the Gault. Palaeontographical Society Monographs Part 1, pp. 1–72, pls. 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedekind, R. 1916. Über Lobus, Suturallobus und Inzision. Zentralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie (B), 1916 (8), 185–95.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, J. 1965. Origin, limits, and systematic position of Scaphites. Palaeontology 8, 397–453, pls. 53–60.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, J. 1966. Stammesgeschichte und system den posttriadischen ammonoideen; ein überblick. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie. Abhandlungen 125, 49–79, pls. 1–2; 127, 13–81, pls. 3–6.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, J. 1969. The heteromorphs and ammonoid extinction. Biological Reviews 44, 563–602, 3 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedmann, J. & Kullman, J. 1980. Ammonoid sutures in ontogeny and phylogeny. In The Ammonoidea (ed. House, M. R. and Senior, J. R.), pp. 215–18. Systematics Association Special Volume 18, xiv + 593 pp. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wright, C. W. 1957. In Treatise on Invertebrate Palaeontology, Part L. Mollusca 4, Cephalopoda Ammonoidea (ed. Moore, R. C.). xxii + 490 pp. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar