Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T14:40:32.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Origin of the West Cumbrian Haematites1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

Haematites of great commercial importance occur in West Cumberland, chiefly in the Carboniferous Limestone. Worked as early as the twelfth century the annual output reached half a million tons by 1861, since when the output has varied between that figure and one million tons. During these years of active exploitation many ore-bodies in the exposed ore field were worked out and active exploration is now concentrated around and to the south of Egremont, where the Carboniferous Limestone plunges beneath the New Red rocks. Among the problems confronting the searchers for new ore-bodies in this concealed ore field there is one of long standing, upon which unanimity has not been reached, namely the origin of the haematites. The question of origin is not one of mere academic interest. Its solution affords an important clue in the search for new ore-bodies. Two theories—magmatic origin and deposition from meteoric waters—are and have been propounded by rival advocates during the last fifty years. J. D. Kendall (1893) attributed the origin of the ores to ascent of magmatic solutions in pre-Permian times. To him we owe the theory of metasomatic replacement of the limestone by haematite, now generally accepted.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Published by permission of the Director of the Geological Survey of Great Britain.

References

Allen, E. T., and Zies, E. G., 1923. A Chemical Study of the Fumaroles of the Katmai Region. Papers from the Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institute, Washington. No. 485.Google Scholar
Dixon, E. E. L., 1928. The Origin of the Cumberland Haematites. Sum. of Prog. for 1927, pt. iii (Mem. Geol. Surv.), p. 23.Google Scholar
Dixon, E. E. L., 1931, in The Geology of the Whitehaven and Workington District (Mem. Geol. Surv.), pp. 279280.Google Scholar
Fohs, F. J., 1910. The Fluorspar Lead and Zinc Deposits of Western Kentucky, Econ. Geol., v, p. 382.Google Scholar
Mellor, J. W., 1934. A comprehensive treatise on inorganic and theoretical chemistry, Iron, pt. ii, xiii.Google Scholar
Mellor, J. W., 1935. Iron, pt. iii, xiv, Longmans Green and Co., London.Google Scholar
Goodchild, J. G., 18891890. Some observations upon the Mode of Occurrence and the Genesis of Metalliferous Deposits, Proc. Geol. Assoc., xi, p. 63.Google Scholar
Kendall, J. D., 1893. The Iron Ores of Great Britain and Ireland, Crosby Lockwood and Son, London.Google Scholar
Kendall, J. D., 1920. Lateral Distribution of Metallic Minerals, Mining Mag., xxiii, p. 75.Google Scholar
MacDonald, W., 1925. The Haematite Deposits of West Cumberland, Iron and Coal Trade Review, 110, p. 434.Google Scholar
Rudler, F. W., 1905. A Handbook to a collection of Minerals in the British Isles (Mem. Geol. Surv.), p. 147.Google Scholar
Smith, B., 1924. The Haematites of West Cumberland, Lancashire and the Lake District (Mem. Geol. Surv.).Google Scholar
Smith, B., 1931. In The Geology of the Whitehaven and Workington District (Mem. Geol. Surv.), p. 270.Google Scholar
Sosman, R. B., and Hostetter, J. C., 1917. The ferrous content and magnetic susceptibility of some artificial and natural oxides of iron. Bull. Amer. Inst. Min. Eng., p. 907.Google Scholar
Trotter, F. M., 1939. Reddened Carboniferous Beds in the Carlisle Basin and Edenside, Geol. Mag., Ixxvi, p. 408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotter, F. M., 1937. In Gosforth District (Mem. Geol. Surv.), p. 70.Google Scholar