Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T14:12:30.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Petrography of the Hunstanton Red Rock

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. H. Rastall
R. H. Rastall
Affiliation:
Fellow of Christ's College, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At Hunstanton Cliff and at Snettisham there is a gradual transition, without physical break, between the Carstone and the Red Rock. At Hunstanton there is a physical break, marked by a solution-surface, between the Red Rock and the Sponge Bed. At Snettisham the Red Rock is incomplete at the top.

The Carstone shows a peculiar and characteristic assemblage of mineral constituents, with much glauconite and ferruginous ooliths. The heavy minerals are notable for the abundance of kyanite and staurolite and rarity of garnet.

The Red Rock consists of three fractions: (a) calcium carbonate, (b) red mud, (c) sand. This sand is exactly like the Carstone, with the same heavy minerals, and it continues, though in diminishing amount, up to the very top of the Red Rock.

The insoluble residue of the Sponge Bed is entirely different: it consists mainly of silicified foraminifera, with a few colourless quartz grains, and it contains no heavy minerals at all.

There is an abrupt and complete lithological change at the base of the Sponge Bed.

The red fraction of the Red Rock is rich in Fe2O3, and Al2O3, and it is suggested that it is of lateritic origin.

The precise manner of formation of the Red Rock is not explained. It has not been found possible to visualize a set of conditions under which fairly large pebbles, ferruginous sand grains, ferruginous ooliths, red mud, and calcium carbonate were all deposited at the same time.

It is suggested that the red mud is due to lateritic material derived from a neighbouring land area.

The heavy mineral assemblage shows that the material of Carstone type did not come from the north, and probably not from the west. The only possible source is the Caledonian and Armorican plateau of London-Brabant or a continuation of it under the North Sea. The sudden change at the top of the Red Rock is due to the submergence of this land area by the Cenomanian transgression, which in Norfolk was accompanied by local erosion: this finally closed the source of supply of the heavy minerals: here and there a slight recurrence of transport of lateritic material gave rise to pink bands in the Chalk at higher horizons.

The interpretation by Messrs. Kitchin and Pringle, on palaeontological grounds, of the relations of the Red Rock to the Carstone and to the Chalk is shown to be quite inconsistent with the results of this petrographical investigation.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 67 , Issue 10 , October 1930 , pp. 436 - 458
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1823. Taylor, R.. Phil. Mag., vol. lxi, p. 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1833. Woodward, S.. “An Outline of the Geology of Norfolk”: Norwich.Google Scholar
1835. Rose, C. B.. “On the Geology of West Norfolk”: Phil. Mag., Series III, vol. vii.Google Scholar
1836. Fitton, W.. “On the Strata below the Chalk”: Trans. Geol. Soc. (II), vol. iv, p. 313.Google Scholar
1859. Wiltshire, T.. “On the Red Chalk of England”: Geologist, vol. ii, p. 261.Google Scholar
1861. Seeley, H. G.. “Notice of Opinions on the Stratigraphical Position of the Red Limestone”: Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (III), vol. vii, p. 240.Google Scholar
1862. Rose, C. B.. “On the Cretaceous Group in Norfolk”: Proc. Geol. Ass., vol. i, p. 233.Google Scholar
1863. Clapham, R. C.. “Analysis of the Red Chalk of Hunstanton”: Geologist, vol. vi, p. 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1864. Seeley, H. G.. “On the Red Rock in the Section at Hunstanton”: Q.J.G.S., vol. xx, p. 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1865. Wiltshire, T.. “On the Red Chalk of England”: Proc. Geol. Ass., vol. i, p. 8.Google Scholar
1867. Judd, J. W.. “On the Strata which form the base of the Lincolnshire Wolds”: Q.J.G.S., vol. xxiii, p. 249.Google Scholar
1869. Wiltshire, T.. “On the Red Chalk of Hunstanton”: Q.J.G.S., vol. xxv, p. 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1875. Bonney, T. G.. Cambridgeshire Geology, Appendix III. Cambridge.Google Scholar
1875. Church, A. H.. “Red Chalk and Red Clay”: Geol. Mag., p. 331.Google Scholar
1876. Barrois, C.. “Recherches sur le Terrain Cretacé Supérieur de I'Angle-terre et de I'Irlande”: Mem. Soc. Géol. Nord., vol. i, p. 156.Google Scholar
1877. Gunn, J.. “Notes on the Red Chalk of Hunstanton”: Proc. Norwich Geol. Soc., vol. i, p. 23.Google Scholar
1878. Whitaker, W.. “The Well-section at Holkham Hall, Norfolk”: Proc. Norwich Geol. Soc.., vol. i p. 16.Google Scholar
1883. Whitaker, W.. “On Things in General and the Red Chalk of Norfolk in Particular”: Proc. Norwich Geol. Soc.., vol. i, p. 207.Google Scholar
1884. Harmer, F. W.. “On the Age of the Red Chalk at Hunstanton”: Proc. Norwich Geol. Soc.., vol. i, p. 248.Google Scholar
1884. Hughes, T. McK.. “On the So-called Spongia paradoxica”: Q.J.G.S., vol. xl, p. 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1886. Strahan, A.. “Notes on the Relations of the Lincolnshire Carstone”: Q.J.G.S., vol. xlii, p. 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1887. Jukes-Browne, A. J. and Hill, W.. “On the Lower Part of the Upper Cretaceous Series in West Suffolk and Norfolk”: Q.J.G.S., vol. xliii, p. 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1887. Woodward, H. B.. The Geology of England and Wales, 2nd edition, p. 406.Google Scholar
1891. Records Geol. Assoc. Excursions, p. 202.Google Scholar
1891. Reed, F. R. C.. A Handbook to the Geology of Cambridgeshire, pp. 83–92. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1899. Whitaker, W. and Jukes-Browne, A. J.. “The Geology of the Borders of the Wash”: Mem. Geol. Survey, pp. 35–45 (with refs. and analyses).Google Scholar
1900. The Cretaceous Rocks of Britain, vol. i: “The Gault and Upper Greensand of England”: Mem. Geol. Survey, pp. 302–4.Google Scholar
1909. Rastall, R. H.. “Cambridgeshire, Bedfordshire and West Norfolk”: Geology in the Field, pp. 151–3.Google Scholar
1919. Rastall, R. H.. “The Mineral Composition of the Lower Greensand Strata of Eastern England”: Geol. Mag., vol. LVI, p. 212–14.Google Scholar
1922. Kitchin, F. L. and Pringle, J.. “On the Overlap of the Upper Gault in England and on the ‘Red Chalk’ of the Eastern Counties”: Geol. Mag., vol. LIX, pp. 194–6.Google Scholar
1926. Versey, H. C. and Carter, C.. “The Petrography of the Carstone and Associated Beds in Yorks. and Lincs.”: Proc. Yorks. Geol. Soc., vol. xx, p. 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar