Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T23:28:07.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radioelement distribution in the Tertiary Lundy granite (Bristol Channel, UK)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Richard S. Thorpe ,
Andrew G. Tindle  and
Olwen Williams-Thorpe
Richard S. Thorpe
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire MK7 6AA, UK
Andrew G. Tindle
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire MK7 6AA, UK
Olwen Williams-Thorpe
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire MK7 6AA, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The radioelement distribution and content of the Lundy granite, a coarse-grained megacrystic granite of Tertiary age, has been measured using a portable gamma-ray spectrometer in order to assess fractionation and alteration processes in the granite. Results indicate a systematic variation of K, Th and U (with a few notable exceptions) that follows a partially concentric distribution to lower concentrations inland. The plateau region of the island (particularly the southern half) is relatively depleted in all radioelements. Over the island, measurements of K vary from 1.3–4.9 wt %, Th varies from 5.0–20.3 ppm and U varies from 2.0–12.5 ppm. A petrographic, electron microprobe and autoradiography examination of the granite indicates that the radioelements mainly reside in discrete major and accessory minerals, of which K-feldspar (K), biotite (K), monazite (Th), xenotime (U), tungsteniferous columbite (U) and uraninite (U) are the most important. Uraninite is rare, being preserved only in fresh samples which come mainly from abandoned quarries. Mass balance modelling indicates that up to 76.6% of uranium could reside in uraninite and where this has been leached by secondary processes such as hydrothermal alteration or weathering then the present radioelement content no longer reflects the original rock composition. Fission track evidence is presented to show the pathways along which uranium has been mobilized from or within the granite. Secondary sites of radioelements include fractures cross-cutting all major minerals (but especially quartz), grain boundaries, altered cores of plagioclase feldspar and occasionally yellowy brown mixed chlorite/smectite replacement product after biotite. Biotite itself may exhibit secondary tracks along cleavage traces. Combined effects of crystal fractionation (primary variation) and secondary alteration best explain the distribution of radioelements, with K controlled by fractionation of the major phases K-feldspar and biotite, Th by fractionation of the accessory mineral monazite (±xenotime and uraninite) and U contents by uraninite and tungsteniferous columbite. Secondary processes have removed much of the uraninite leaving behind indeterminate Fe—U material along fractures and residual U (and Th) enrichment within altered major minerals. There is some evidence to suggest that late radioelement-bearing fluids precipitated monazite and uraniferous zircon along fractures during the waning stages of magmatic activity.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 132 , Issue 4 , July 1995 , pp. 413 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bott, M. H. P., Day, A. A. & Mason, Smith D., 1958. The geological interpretation of gravity and magnetic surveys in Devon and Cornwall. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 251, 161–91.Google Scholar
Brooks, M. J. & Thompson, M. S., 1973. The Geological interpretation of a gravity survey of the Bristol Channel. Journal of the Geological Society, London 129, 245–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buntebarth, G., 1976. Distribution of uranium in intrusive bodies due to combined migration and diffusion. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 32, 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charoy, B., 1986. The genesis of the Comubian batholith (South-West England): the example of the Carnmenellis pluton. Journal of Petrology 27, 571–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollar, A. T. J., 1941. The Lundy complex: its petrology and tectonics. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London 97, 39–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, E. A., Williams, B. J. & Taylor, R. T., 1979. Geology of Bideford and Lundy Island. Memoir of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, 129 pp.Google Scholar
Exploranium. 1990. Portable Gamma Ray Spectrometer Model GR-256 with Model GPS-2J Detector. Exploranium G.S. Ltd., Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Holloway, S. & Chadwick, R. S., 1986. The Sticklepath—Lustleigh fault zone: Tertiary sinistral reactivation of a Variscan dextral strike-slip fault. Journal of the Geological Society, London 143, 447–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Løvborg, L., 1984. The calibration of portable and airborne gamma-ray spectrometers — theory, problems and facilities. Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark, Report M2456.Google Scholar
Potts, P. J., Thorpe, O. W. & Watson, J. S., 1981. Determination of the rare earth element abundances in 29 international rock standards by instrumental neutron activation analysis: a critical appraisal of calibration errors. Chemical Geology 34, 331–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, P. J. & Webb, P. C., 1992. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 44, 251–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, P. J., Webb, P. C. & Watson, J. S., 1984. Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis of silicate rocks for major and trace elements. X-ray Spectrometry 13, 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romberger, S. B., 1984. Transport and deposition of uranium in hydrothermal systems at temperatures up to 300 °C: geological implications. In Uranium Geochemistry, Mineralogy, Geology, Exploration and Resources (eds. Vivo, B. de Ippolito, F., and Simpson, P. R.), London: Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.Google Scholar
Rybach, L. & Buntebarth, G., 1981. Heat-generating radioelements in granitic magmas. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 10, 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. V., 1974. Feldspar Minerals: 2-Chemical and Textural Properties. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Stone, M., 1988. The significance of almandine garnets in the Lundy and Dartmoor granites. Mineralogical Magazine 52, 651–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, M., 1990. The Lundy granite: a geochemical and petrogenetic comparison with Hercynian and Tertiary granites. Mineralogical Magazine 54, 431–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, R. S., Tindle, A. G. & Gledhill, A. R., 1990. The petrology, geochemistry and petrogenesis of the Tertiary Lundy granite (Bristol Channel U.K.). Journal of Petrology 31,1379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, R. S. & Tindle, A. G., 1991. Lundy: remnant of a Tertiary volcano in the Bristol Channel. Geology Today 7, 165.Google Scholar
Thorpe, R. S. & Tindle, A. G., 1992. The petrology and petrogenesis of a Tertiary bimodal dolerite-peralkaline/subalkaline trachyte/rhyolite dyke association from Lundy (Bristol Channel U.K.). Geological Journal 27, 101–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweedie, J. R., 1979. Origin of Uranium and other metal enrichments in the Helmsdale granite, eastern Sutherland, Scotland. Transactions of the Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (Section B: Appl. Earth Sciences) 88, 145–53.Google Scholar
Webb, P. C. & Brown, G. C., 1984 a. Lake District granites: Heat production and related geochemistry. Key worth: British Geological Survey, Geothermal Resources Programme, Investigation into the Geothermal Potential of the UK. 66 pp.Google Scholar
Webb, P. C. & Brown, G. C., 1984 b. Eastern Highlands granites: heat production and related geochemistry. Key worth: British Geological Survey, Geothermal Resources, Programme, Investigation into the Geothermal Potential of the UK. 77 pp.Google Scholar
Webb, P. C., Tindle, A. G. & Barritt, S. D., 1987. Factors controlling the distribution of heat production in selected UK granites. Journal of Geophysical Research Letters 14, 299–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenner, D. B. & Spaulding, J. D., 1982. Uranium and thorium geochemistry in the Elberton batholith of the southern Appalacians U.S.A. Mineralogical Magazine 46, 227–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. S., 1988. A hot-spot model for early Tertiary volcanism in the N. Atlantic. In Early Tertiary Volcanism and the Opening of the NE Atlantic (eds Morton, A. C. and Parson, L. M.), pp. 393–414. Geological Society Special Publication no. 39.Google Scholar
Zielinski, R. A., Peterman, Z. E., Stuckless, J. S., Rosholt, J. N. & Nkomo, I. T., 1981. The Chemical And Isotopic Record Of rock-water interaction in the Sherman granite, Wyoming and Colorado. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 78, 209–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar