Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T17:45:51.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rumanian graptolites from boreholes on the Moesian Platform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. B. Rickards  and
M. Iordan
R. B. Rickards
Affiliation:
Sedgwick Museum Downing Street Cambridge CB2 3EQ
M. Iordan
Affiliation:
Institutul Geologic, Sos. Kiseleff 2 Bucureşti
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Recent collections of graptolites from the Călărasi, Ianca-Berlescu and Tăndărei boreholes have helped to refine the stratigraphy of Silurian (Wenlock, Ludlow) and Devonian rocks of the Moesian Platform. Fourteen species are recorded for the first time from Rumanian strata, others are left under open nomenclature, whilst well-preserved specimens of the following species provide additional information on their detailed morphology and hence upon their relationships and evolution: Monocliniacis sp., Holoreriolites (Balticograptus) cf. balticus Eisenack, Saetograptus cf. rams (Teller), Monograptus kolihai Bouček, ?Cyrtograptus sp., Barrandeograpus pulchellus (Tullberg), and ?Neodiversograptus ex gr. nilssoni(Barrande).

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 112 , Issue 3 , May 1975 , pp. 241 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bouček, B. 1931. Přdbēžná zpráva o nĕkterých druzich graptolitů z českého gotlandienu. Věst. st. geol. Úst. Césl. Repub., 7, 293–313.Google Scholar
Bouček, B. 1932. Prédběna zpráva o některých nových druzich graptolitů z českeho gotlandienu (pt. 2). Věst. St. geol. Úst. Cěsl. Repub. 8, 150–3.Google Scholar
Bouček, B. 1933. Monographie der Obersilurischen Graptolithen aus der Familie Cyrtograptidae. Trav. Inst. géol. Paléont. Univ. Charles, 1, 1–84.Google Scholar
Bouček, B. & Münch, A. 1952. Retioliti středoevropskeho surchniho wenlocku a ludlowu. Sb. ústřed. Ust. geol. 19, 1–151.Google Scholar
Bouček, B. & Přibyl, A. 1952. On some slender species of the genus Monograptus Geinitz, especially of the subgenera Mediograptus and Globosograptus. Rozpr. České Akad. Věd Uměni 62, 1–32.Google Scholar
Bouček, B. & Přibyl, A. 1954. Contribution to our knowledge of the Cyrtograptids from the Silurian of Bohemia and on their stratigraphical importance. Rozpr. české akad. 62, 1–25.Google Scholar
Bulman, O. M. B. & Rickards, R. B. 1970. Classification of the graptolite family Monograptidae Lapworth, 1873. Addendum in Teichert, C. (Ed.): Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, V: Graptolithina with Sections on Enteropneusta and Pterobranchia (2nd ed.), 149–57. Geol. Soc. America and University Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A. 1951. Retioliten aus dem Graptolithengestein. Palaeontographica (A), 100, 129–63.Google Scholar
Grigoras, N. 1957. Asupra prezentei Silurianului în Dobrogea. Bul. st. Sect. Geol. Geogr. Acad. Rom. 1, 97–108.Google Scholar
Hutt, J. 1969. The development of the Ludlovian graptolite Saetograptus varians. Lethaia, 2, 361–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iordan, M. 1972. Graptolitii din forajul Tăndărei (Platforma Moesica). D.S. Inst. Geol. 58, 33–47.Google Scholar
Iordan, M. & Rickards, R. B. 1971. Notă asupra graptolitilor din Platforma moesică. D.S. Inst. Geol. 57, 5–19.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. E. & Lenz, A. C. 1972. Monograptids from the Upper Silurian and Lower Devonian of Yukon Territory, Canada. Palaeontology 15, 579–97.Google Scholar
Jaeger, H. 1959. Graptolithen und Stratigraphie des jüngsten Thuringer Silurs. Abh. dt. Akad. Wiss. Berl. (Chem. Geol. Biol.), 1959, no. 2, 1–197.Google Scholar
Lapworth, C. 1875. In Hopkinson, J. & Lapworth, C. 1875. Description of the graptolites of the Arenig and Liandeilo rocks of St Davids. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 31, 631–72.Google Scholar
Lapworth, C. 1880. On new British graptolites. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (5), 5, 149–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirǎutǎ, O. & Mirǎutǎ, E. 1962. Paleozoicul din partea de sud a munilor Mačin (reg. Cerna-Hamcearca). D.S. Com. Geol. 46, 129–42.Google Scholar
Murgeanu, G. & Spassov, C. 1968. Les graptolites du forage Bordei Verde (Roumanie). Bull. Geol. Inst. serv. Pal. 17, 229–39.Google Scholar
Palmer, D. 1971. The Ludlow graptolites Neodiversograptus nilssoni and Cucullograptus (Lobograptus) progenitor. Lethaia, 4, 357–84.Google Scholar
Přibyl, A. 1940. Die Graptolithenfauna des mittleren Ludlows von Böhmen (oberes eβ). Věst. st. geol. Úst. Cěsl. Repub. 16, 63–73.Google Scholar
Răileanu, G., Iordan, M. & Săndulescu, E. 1967. Consideratii asupra Paleozoicului inferior din zona Călăraşi. D.S. Com. Stat. Geol. 53, 419–26.Google Scholar
Rickards, R. B. 1965. New Silurian graptolites from the Howgill Fells (Northern England). Palaeontology 8, 247–71.Google Scholar
Rickards, R. B. 1967. The Wenlock and Ludlow succession in the Howgill Fells (north-west Yorkshire and Westmorland). Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 123, 215–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickards, R. B. 1968. The thecal structure of Monoclimacis? galaensis. Lethaia, 1 303–9.Google Scholar
Stanoiu, I. 1971. Notă preliminară asupra prezentei silurianului fosilifer în Carpatii Meridionali. O.S. Com. Geol. 56, 5–15.Google Scholar
Teller, L. 1964. Graptolite fauna and stratigraphy of the Ludlovian deposits of the Chelm Borehole, Eastern Poland. Polska Akademia Nauk, 13 1–88.Google Scholar
Tullberg, S. A. 1883. Skanes graptoliter, 11. Sver geol. Unders. (c) 55, 1–43.Google Scholar
Urbanek, A. 1966. On the morphology and evolution of the Cucullograptinae (Monograptidae, Graptolithina). Acta palaeont. pol. 11, 291–544.Google Scholar