Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T14:24:13.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sowerby's and Sharpe's Belemnites lanceolatus and their relation to Belemnites lanceolatus Schlotheim, 1813

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Jurij A. Jeletzky
Jurij A. Jeletzky
Affiliation:
(Geological Survey of Canada)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Belemnites are common throughout the boreal province of the Upper Cretaceous Series of Eurasia occurring at practically all horizons of the so-called Senonian stage (in the broader sense) nearly everywhere in this province; often they are the only group of fossils to be met frequently enough to be used for stratigraphical purposes. Despite this there have so far been relatively few efforts to use the Upper Cretaceous belemnites as zone-fossils, with the exception of some Actinocamax and Gonioteuthis species. The probable reasons for this regrettable neglect have already been mentioned in a previous paper (e.g. Jeletzky, 1946, pp. 87–90). Our researches, the results of which have till now only partly been published (e.g. Jeletzky, 1940, 1941, 1946) have shown that the Upper Cretaceous belemnites occur relatively frequently, and in the same stratigraphical order throughout the whole Eurasian boreal province and are in fact excellent guide fossils.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 85 , Issue 6 , December 1948 , pp. 338 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arkhangelsky, A. D., 1912. The Upper Cretaceous Deposits in the eastern part of European Russia. Materialy dlya geologii Rossii, 25. St. Petersburg (Russian).Google Scholar
Blackmore, H. P., 1896. Some notes on the Aptichi from the Upper Chalk. Geol. Mag., xxxiii, 529–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blainville, D. de, 1827. Memoire sur les Bélemnites considerée zoologiquement et géologiquement. Paris.Google Scholar
Bülow-Trummer, E. V., 1920. Fossilum Catalogus, I: Animalia pars 11, Cephalopoda dibranchiata. Berlin.Google Scholar
Breynius, J. P., 1732. De Polythalmiis nova testacorum classe, hunc adicitur Comentatuncula de Belemnites prussicus tandunque schediasma de Echinus metodice disponendis. Gedani.Google Scholar
Crick, G. C., 1910. On Belemnocamax boweri n.g. et sp. A new Cephalopod from the Lower Chalk of Lincolnshire. Proc. Geol. Assoc., xxi, 360–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritsch, A., 1872. Die Cephalopoden der böhmischen Kreideformation Prague.Google Scholar
Hägg, R., 1947. Die Mollusken und Brachiopoden der schwedischen Oberkreide. III—Das Kristianstadgebiet. Sver. Geol. Undersökn., Ser. C, No. 485, Årsbok 41 (1947), 4.Google Scholar
Jeletzky, J. A. (wrongly written Eletsky), 1940. Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Deposits in the Basin of the Desna River near Novgorod-Seversk. Journ. Geol., vii. Kiev (Ukrainian with English summary).Google Scholar
Jeletzky, J. A. (wrongly written Eletsky), 1941. Über die Systematik und Phylogenie der Belemniten der oberen λre de. Dopovidi Akad. Nauk Vkr.SSR, 2. Kiev (Ukrainian and German).Google Scholar
Jeletzky, J. A. (wrongly written Eletsky), 1946. Zur Kenntnis der oberkretazischen Belemniten. Geol. Fören. Förhandl., lxviii, 1.Google Scholar
Jukes-Browne, A. J., 1900–1904. The Cretaceous Rocks of Britain I–III. London.Google Scholar
Jukes-Browne, A. J., and Hill, W., 1896. A delimitation of the Cenomanian: being a comparison of the corresponding beds in South-Western England and Western France. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lii.Google Scholar
Miller, J. G. 1826. Observations on the genus Actinocamax. Trans. Geol. Soc. London, 2, 63–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moberg, J. Ch., 1885. Cephalopoderna i Sveriges Kritsystem. 2, Artbeskrivning. Sver. Geol. Undersökn., Ser. C, No. 73.Google Scholar
Moberg, J. Ch., 1894. Über schwedische Kreidebelemniten. Neues Jahrb. Min., etc., ii, 69–78.Google Scholar
Müller, G., and Wolleman, A. 1906. Die Molluskenfauna des Untersenons von Braunschweig und Ilsede. 2, Die Cephalopoden. Abhandl. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., 47.Google Scholar
Nowak, J., 1913. Cephalopoden der oberen Kreide in Polen. 3. Bull. Acad. Sci. Cracovie, Ser. B.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. d', 1842. Paléontologie française. Terrains crétacées 1, Céphalopodes. Paris.Google Scholar
Pavlow, A. P., 1913. Les Céphalopodes du jura et du crétace inferieur de la Sibérie septentrionale. Mem. Acad. imp. St. Petersburg, Sér. 8 (xxi), 4.Google Scholar
Schloenbach, U. V., 1868. Bemerkungen Über Sharpe's und Sowerby's Belemnites lanceolatus und über Sowerby's B. granulatus. Jb. k. k. geol. R.A., xviii, 461. Wien.Google Scholar
Schlotheim, E. F. v., 1813. Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Versteinerungen in geologischer Hinsicht. Leonard's Taschenbuch für die gesamte Mineralogie, 7 Jahrgang, 1–134.Google Scholar
Schlotheim, E. F. v., 1820. Die Petrefactenkunde. Gotha.Google Scholar
Schlüter, Cl., 1876. Die Cephalopoden der oberen deutschen Kreide. 2. Paläontographica, 24.Google Scholar
Sharpe, D., 1853–1857. Description of the fossil remains of Molluska found in the Chalk of England. 1, Cephalopoda. Palaontographical Society, 7–9.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J., 1829. The mineral conchology of Great Britain, vi. London.Google Scholar
Stolley, E., 1897. Über die Gliederung des norddeutschen und baltischen Senons, sowie die dasselbe charakterisierenden Belemniten. Archiv. Antropol. Geol. Schleswig-Holsteins (ii), 2.Google Scholar
Stolley, E., 1905. Zur Kenntnis der norddeutschen Kreide. Jahresber. Ver. Naturwissenschaften, xiv.Google Scholar