Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T23:01:45.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vermiforichnus borings from the Ordovician of central Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. K. Pickerill
Affiliation:
Department of GeologyUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonNew BrunswickCanada

Summary

The epizoan Vermiforichnus Cameron (1969b) from the Upper Ordovician (Caradoc) of the Berwyn Hills and the Welsh Borders is host-specific, occurring in association with the strophomenid Macrocoelia and the orthid Heterorthis. The spionid polychaete probably responsible for the production of the Vermiforichnus borings inhabited both live and dead individuals. In live individuals Vermiforichnus was located at the anterior margin and oriented perpendicular to the commissure, this position affording both a means of protection and a more efficient feeding position. In dead individuals population density was lower and the borings were randomly oriented. Vermiforichnus was restricted to inner—outer sublittoral environments and, as such, is a useful palaeoenvironmental guide.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boekschoten, G. J. 1966. Shell borings of sessile epibiontic organisms as palaeoecological guides. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 3, 311362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, R. G. 1970. Borings as trace fossils and Entobia cretacea Portlock, as an example. In Crimes, T. P. & Harper, J. C. (Eds): Trace Fossils. Geol. J. spec. Issue 3, 4980. (Liverpool, 1970).Google Scholar
Cameron, B. 1967. Fossilization of an ancient (Devonian) soft-bodied worm. Science 155, 1246–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron, B. 1969 (a). Paleozoic shell boring annelids and their trace fossils. Am. Zool. 9, 689703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, B. 1969(b). New name for Paleosabella prisca (McCoy), a Devonian worm-boring, and its preserved probable borer. J. Paleont. 43, 189–92.Google Scholar
Galtsoff, P. S. 1964. The American oyster. U.S. Dept. of int., Fish and Wildlife Service, Fishery Bull. 64, 480 pp.Google Scholar
Hecker, R. F. 1970. Palaeoichnological research in the Palaeontological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. In Crimes, T. P. and Harper, J. C. (Ed.): Trace fossils. Geol. J. spec. Issue 3, 215–26.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. 1957. Über den Röhrenbau und die Nahrungsaufnahme einiger Spioniden der deutschen Küsten. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters 6, 100–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, J. M. 1974. Selective epizoan encrustation of some Silurian Brachiopods from Gotland. Palaeontology 17, 423–9.Google Scholar
Korringa, P. 1951. The shell of Ostrea edulis as a habitat: observations on the epifauna of oysters living in the Oosterschelde, Holland, with some notes on polychaete worms occurring there in other habitats. Archs. néerl. Zool. 10, 32152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, A. 1934. Lower Paleozoic brachiopods of the Girvan District, with suggestions on morphology in relation to environment. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. series 10, 14, 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickerill, R. K. 1973. Lingulasma tenuigranulata — palaeoecology of a large Ordovician linguloid that lived within a strophomenid-trilobite community. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol, Palaeoecol. 13, 143–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, R. P. 1972. Autecology of Richmondian Brachiopods (Late Ordovician of Indiana and Ohio). J. Paleont. 46, 386406.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1965. Ecology and paleoecology. In Moore, R. C. (Ed): Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H, Brachiopods, 119214. Geol. Soc. Am. and Univ. Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1974. Substrate specificity of Devonian epizoa. J. Paleont. 48, 881–94.Google Scholar