Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T18:54:27.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VI.—Radio-activity and the Earth's Thermal History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Arthur Holmes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The distribution of land and sea implies that the earth's outer shell is in a condition of approximate hydrostatic equilibrium. Otherwise the equatorial regions should be girdled by a continental protrusion, or else each of the polar regions should be occupied by a continental bulge. The observed fact that the inequalities of the earth's surface exhibit neither of these conditions proves that the general ellipticity of the lithosphere does not differ greatly from that which would be assumed by a liquid spheroid having a similar distribution of density in depth. The incapacity—thus demonstrated—of the lithosphere to endure permanent stresses leads naturally to an inquiry into the conditions that maintain continents and mountain ranges above sea-level. Investigations based on the deviations of the plumb-line from the vertical and on the varying intensity of gravity indicate beyond doubt that the elevated tracts of the globe owe their support to a deficiency of density in their deep-seated foundations, while the great sunken areas owe their depression to a corresponding excess of density in the underlying rocks. Thus has arisen the conception of isostasy, a word which was coined by Dutton in 1889 to express the state of hydrostatic balance that maintains in position elevated and depressed columns of the lithosphere.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 3 , Issue 6 , June 1916 , pp. 265 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1916

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 265 note 1 Parts I and II appeared in the Geol. Mag. for February and March, 1915, pp. 60–71, 102–12.Google Scholar

page 265 note 2 Jeffreys, H., “The Mechanical Properties of the Earth”: The Observatory, 491, p. 348, 1915.Google Scholar

page 265 note 3 Bull. Phil. Soc. Wash., xi, p. 53, 1889.Google Scholar

page 265 note 4 Or hydrodynamic?Google Scholar

page 265 note 5 C.R., vol. xxix, p. 730, 1849.Google Scholar

page 265 note 6 Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. cxlv, 1885.Google Scholar

page 265 note 7 Ibid.

page 265 note 8 Bull. Phil. Soc. Wash., xiii, p. 31, 1895.Google Scholar

page 266 note 1 Hayford, Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci., vol. viii, p. 25, 1906Google Scholar; U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, 1909 and 1910; Science, vol. xxxiii, p. 199, 1911Google Scholar. Bowie, Hayford, U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, 1912Google Scholar, Spec. Pub. 10. Bowie, U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, 1912, Spec. Pub. 12; Am. Journ. Sci., vol. xxxiii, p. 237, 1912.Google Scholar

page 266 note 2 Burrard, Survey of India, 1912, Prof. Paper 12; Crosthwait, Survey of India, 1912, Prof. Pap. 13.Google Scholar

page 266 note 3 Schiötz, Skrift. Vedensk. Selsk. Christiania, 1908, No. 6.Google Scholar

page 266 note 4 Veröff, Hecker. k. Preuss. geodät. Inst. Berlin, 1903Google Scholar, No. 11; 1908, No. 12. See also Bauer, , Am. Journ. Sci., vol. xxxi, p. 1, 1911; vol. xxxiii, p. 245, 1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 266 note 5 Gilbert, , U.S.G.S., 1913Google Scholar, Prof. Pap. 85-C. Barrell, , Journ. Geol., vol. xxii, Nos. 1–8, 1914; vol. xxiii, Nos. 1, 5, and 6, 1915.Google Scholar

page 266 note 6 Journ. Geol., vol. xx, p. 97, 1912.Google Scholar

page 267 note 1 At the surface strong limestone or granite can sustain a stress difference of 25,000 pounds per square inch (1,750 kg. per sq. cm.).Google Scholar

page 268 note 1 Barrell, , op. cit., p. 677, 1914.Google Scholar

page 268 note 2 Hayford, , Proc. Am. Phil. Soc., vol. liv, p. 298, 1915.Google Scholar

page 268 note 3 Veröff. Preuss. geodät. Inst., No. 54, 1912.Google Scholar

page 269 note 1 By the expression “fusion-point of a rock” is meant the minimum temperature at which the whole of the rock passes into the non-crystalline condition.Google Scholar

page 270 note 1 70 km. would be the maximum depth possible if the continents were not capped with granites.Google Scholar

page 271 note 1 Radio-activity and Geology, 1909, p. 94;Google Scholar see also The Birth-time of the World, 1915, p. 116 et seq.Google Scholar

page 272 note 1 “Isostasy and Radio-activity”: Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., vol. xxvi, pp. 171–204, 1915.Google Scholar