Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T15:07:00.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Speculations on Possible Physical and Cosmical Phenomena in Reference to the Past Conditions of Our Earth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2016

Get access

Extract

Whenever we begin to think about the formation of the universe we get at once into the realms of speculation, and the only value of our thoughts rests in their probability. In everything unknown we must first form an idea—that is, speculate; then, by partial gatherings of facts, or by positive reasoning, we may theorize. Ultimately, by the accumulation of evidence, we may prove that which, in the first place, we only imagined. When first men observed the sun, they regarded the earth as a flat plain, over which the sun passed in his heavenly course, and below which, at eve, he retired to rest. It was not until many ages had elapsed that the world came to be regarded as round, and even then it was long before the sun was considered as a fixed centre of the planetary system revolving round him.

By no nation of ancient times has astronomy been more advanced than the Greeks. Not that the Greeks ever worked out much to a proved result, but they were an imaginative people, and they invented notions. If one theory or speculation was disproved, they invented another; and, hit or miss, they always seemed to have fresh ideas in reserve. In some things astronomical, as in many other things that the world believes in, we may be heretics, and we admit we do not adhere to all the cosmical, physical, geological, and spiritual tenets of the popular faiths. We may not entirely believe in the perfect stability of the universe; we may doubt the eternal endurance of the sun's bright rays; and we may not quite acquiesce in the unchangeable permanence of tne planetary orbits: in short, we do not believe in the permanence of anything whatever in creation. All ever has been change, and changeful all things ever will be. Diversity and change are visible in the first created things of which any relics have been left us.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1863

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 182 note * Considerable confusion of ideas and a want of logic will he attributed to me in these articles if it be not distinctly borne in mind that I adopt popular ideas and popular phraseology only for the moment, and that it is not intended to work these speculations into any definite theory. If any definite conclusions be arrived at, they will be given as corollaries to these speculations, and not embodied in them. For example, we speak now upon the dictum that the volume of the sun is 1,400,000 greater than the earth, its mass being as 354,936 to 1, and its diameter as 882,000 to 8000, or 111½ times greater than the earth. This gives the sun a mean density four times less than the earth,—a point we shall presently discuss, as it is very questionable if we ought to take the visible face of the sun, and his apparent size, in determining his density, because heated to the extent of nearly 15,000 degrees, and having, as astronomers declare, an exterior luminous photosphere; and, as Kirchhof and Bunsen have shown, a still exterior atmosphere of luminous incandescent metallic vapour. The light-exhausted internal uucleus of burnt-out and probably solid material of the central core of our luminary is what we ought to consider as the actual globe of the sun, and which is what we should properly estimate for his mass and density, at any rate for purposes of comparison with our earth.