Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-05T03:17:27.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Christina Möller's, Völkerstrafrecht und Internationaler Strafgerichtshof – kriminologische, straftheoretische und rechtspolitische Aspekte - [Christina Möller, Völkerstrafrecht und Internationaler Strafgerichtshof – kriminologische, straftheoretische und rechtspolitische Aspekte (Münster, Hamburg, London: LIT, 2003); Univ. Diss. Münster, ISBN 3-8258-6533-9]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Legal Culture
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Möller, Christina, Völkerstrafrecht und Internationaler Strafgerichtshof – kriminologische, straftheoretische und rechtspolitische Aspekte 3 (2003).Google Scholar

2 Id. at 17 – 217.Google Scholar

3 Id. at 232 – 237.Google Scholar

4 Id. at 15.Google Scholar

5 Id. at 12.Google Scholar

6 Id. at 420.Google Scholar

7 Id. at 422 to cite the most obvious example.Google Scholar

9 Id. at 550–560.Google Scholar

10 Meyer-Ladewig, Hk-EMRK, Baden-Baden 2003, Art. 6 § 27. Just to be complete: such a right can under the ECHR in fact be deduced from provision safeguarding the right violated by the crime, e. g. the right to life, Art. 2 of the ECHR, in the case of murder, but not from the right to an effective remedy.Google Scholar

11 Supra, note 1 at 440 – 447, 456, 462 – 464, 468 – 470, 479 – 482, 487 – 491, 509 – 511.Google Scholar

12 Id. at 447.Google Scholar

13 Id. at 611.Google Scholar

14 Id. at 610.Google Scholar

15 Id. at 313.Google Scholar

16 Id. at 329.Google Scholar

17 Id. at 314.Google Scholar

18 Id. at 622.Google Scholar

19 Id. at 455.Google Scholar

20 Id. at 610.Google Scholar

21 Id. at 315-350.Google Scholar

22 Id. at 347.Google Scholar

23 Id. at 333.Google Scholar

24 Id.at 321 – 327. Shows (involuntarily) that an international legal system based on state consensus is actually able to ensure the respect of basic human rights, despite the sharp criticism it receives from “cosmopolitans”.Google Scholar