Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-30T18:58:40.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment on Daniel Thym – United in Diversity or Diversified in the Union?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Michał Kowalski

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Part IV: Territorial and Temporal Aspects of Unity
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 6 , Issue 11: The Unity of the European Constitution: 2nd German-Polish Seminar on the Constitutional Law of the European Union , 01 November 2005 , pp. 1749 - 1753
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 See Thym, in this volume.Google Scholar

2 Yet, it should be noted that the issue has not been in the centre of the EU legal discourse in Poland and the first comprehensive monograph in Polish on enhanced cooperation and other asymmetric mechanisms was published only in 2005. See Monika Szwarc, Zróżnicowana Integracja i Wzmocniona Współpraca w Prawie Unii Europejskiej [Differentiated Integration and Enhanced Cooperation in the European Union Law] (2005).Google Scholar

3 Dudzik, Sławomir, “Enhanced Cooperation” Between EU Member States – An Opportunity or a Threat to Poland, in The Emerging Constitutional Law Of The European Union 239 (Adam Bodnar et al. eds., 2003); see, e.g., Brygida Kuźniak, Komentarz do TUE art. 43-45 [Commentary to TEU art. 43-45], in Traktat o Unii Europejskiej. Komentarz [Treaty on the European Union. Commentary], 461, 464 (Kazimierz Lankosz Ed., 2003).Google Scholar

4 Władysław Czapliński, Koncepcja ściślejszej współpracy w prawie Unii Europejskiej [The Concept of Closer Cooperation in the European Union Law], 3-4 Studia Prawnicze 75, 89 (2001).Google Scholar

5 Traktat z Nicei – polski punkt widzenia [The Treaty of Nice – the Polish Standpoint] (2001).Google Scholar

6 Rzeczpospolita of 4 May 2005, A5.Google Scholar

7 Rzeczpospolita of 16 June 2005, A10.Google Scholar

8 See Biernat, Stanisław, Możliwe następstwa odmowy ratyfikacji traktatu konstytucyjnego przez jedno lub kilka państw członkowskich [Possible Consequences of Constitutional Treaty Ratification Refusal in One or More Member States], in Konstytucja Dla Europy: Przyszły Fundament Unii Europejskiej [Constitution for Europe: Future Fundament of the European Union] 453, 469 (Sławomir Dudzik ed., 2005).Google Scholar

9 Thym, , supra note 1, at para. 9 (referring to Armin von Bogdandy, Europäische Prinzipienlehre, in Europäisches Verfassungsrecht 149, 180 (von Bogdandy ed., 2003)).Google Scholar

10 Mik, Cezary, Legitymacja demokratyczna Unii Europejskiej w świetle Traktatu Konstytucyjnego [Democratic Legitimacy of the EU in the Light of Constitutional Treaty], in Demokratyzacja i Wzmocnienie Legitymacji Unii Europejskiej [Democratization and Legitimacy Strengthening of the European Union] 18, 22 (Jan Barcz ed., 2005).Google Scholar

11 See Dudzik, Sławomir, Mechanizm wzmocnionej współpracy na tle konstytucyjnych zasad porządku prawnego Unii Europejskiej [Enhanced Cooperation Mechanism in the Perspective of Constitutional Principles of the EU Legal Order], 1 Kwartalnik Prawa Publicznego 7, 22 (2003).Google Scholar

12 Thym, , supra note 1, at para. 15.Google Scholar

13 Thym, , supra note 1, at para. 1.Google Scholar

14 Schorkopf, Frank, Constitutionalization or a Constitution for the European Union, in The Emerging Constitutional Law Of The European Union, supra note 3, at 1, 11–12.Google Scholar