Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T04:53:33.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Equator Principles: Evaluating the Exposure of Commercial Lenders to Socio-Environmental Risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As a system of managing environmental and social risk in the sector of large-scale international project finance, the Equator Principles (EPs) have generated increased interest and critical engagement in the private, public, and academic spheres. Particular research in the field of transnational governance is especially concerned with assessing the degree in which private and public actors are revolutionizing the methods and procedures of governance in the wake of the decline of the welfare state, and rise of the post-regulatory state. Social scientists and legal theorists alike have begun analyzing the effects of a shift in the “emphasis of control, to a greater or lesser degree, from traditional bureaucratic mechanisms towards instruments of regulation.” Within this context, the EPs present an opportunity to analyze and assess the structure, procedures and effectiveness of a self-regulatory governance system, voluntarily established by private actors in the international project finance sector, to mitigate social and environmental risks.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Scott, Colin, Regulation in the Age of Governance: the Rise of the Post Regulatory State, in The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance 145, 148 (Jacint Jordana & David Levi-Faur eds., 2004).Google Scholar

2 Conley, John & Williams, Cynthia, Global banks as Global Sustainability Regulators?: The Equator Principles, 33 L. & Pol'y 1, 2 (2011).Google Scholar

3 Id. at 5.Google Scholar

4 Equator Principles, “About the Equator Principles”, available at: http://www.equator-principles.com/index.php/about-ep (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

5 Principles, Equator, Equator Principles: A Financial Industry Benchmark for Determining, Assessing and Managing Social and Environmental Risk in Project Finance 1, 2-7 (2006), available at: http://www.equator-principles.com/index.php/the-eps-and-official-translations (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

6 Amalric, Franck, The Equator Principles: A Step Towards Sustainability?, 1 Center For Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Working Paper Series 1, 9 (2005).Google Scholar

7 Equator Principles, supra note 5, at 2.Google Scholar

8 Equator Principles, supra note 5, at 3.Google Scholar

10 Id. at 4.Google Scholar

12 Equator Principles, supra note 5, at 4.Google Scholar

13 Bank Track, The Outside Job: Turning the Equator Principles Towards People and Planet 1, 8 (2011) available at: http://www.banktrack.org/download/the_outside_job/111021_the_outside_job_final.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

14 Equator Principles, supra note 5, at 5.Google Scholar

18 Farrell, L. Michael, Principle-agency Risk in Project Finance, 21 Int'l. J. Proj. Mgmt. 547, 548 (2003).Google Scholar

19 Id. at 553.Google Scholar

20 Equator Principles, supra note 5, at 5.Google Scholar

21 Id. at 6.Google Scholar

22 Amalric, , supra note 6, at 10.Google Scholar

23 IFC, International Finance Corporations Policy on Social & Environmental Sustainability, 2 (2006), available at: http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/sustainability.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/pol_SocEnvSustainability2006/$FILE/SustainabilityPolicy.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

24 Id. at 3.Google Scholar

25 Id. at 3-4.Google Scholar

26 IFC, supra note 23, at 1.Google Scholar

27 Id. at 5-6.Google Scholar

28 Esty, Benjamin & Megginson, William, Creditor Rights, Enforcement, and Debt Ownership Structure: evidence from the Global Syndicated Loan Market, 38 J. of Fin. Quant. 1, 4 (2003).Google Scholar

29 Amalric, , supra note 6, at 10.Google Scholar

30 Id. at 11.Google Scholar

31 Equator Principles, supra note 5, at 2.Google Scholar

32 A. Ng & Martin Loosemore, Risk Allocation in the Private Provision of Public Infrastructure, 25 Int'l J. of Proj. Mgmt. 66, 68 (2007).Google Scholar

33 Bank Track, supra note 13, at 2.Google Scholar

34 Equator Principles, The Equator Principles Governance Association Rules, 7 (2010), available at: http://www.equator-principles.com/resources/ep_governance_rules_june_2010.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

35 Coulson, Andrea, A Benchmarking Study: Environmental Credit Risk Factors in the Pan European Banking Sector, Isis Asset Management 1, 7, (2002), available at: http://www.peblds.org/files/Publications/Articles/ISIS_Environmental_Credit_Risk_Factors.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

37 Forest Reinhardt, Down to Earth: Applying Business Principles to Environmental Management (2000).Google Scholar

38 Conley & Williams, supra note 2, at 11.Google Scholar

39 Richardson, Benjamin, Protecting Indigenous Peoples through Socially Responsible Investment, 6 Indigen. L. J. 205, 225 (2007).Google Scholar

40 Bank Track, supra note 13, at 2.Google Scholar

41 Conley, & Williams, , supra note 2, at 3.Google Scholar

42 Amalric, , supra note 6, at 9.Google Scholar

43 Esty, Benjamin, The Economic Motivations for Using Project Finance 1, 6 Harvard Business School (2003), available at: http://www.people.hbs.edu/besty/BCE%20PF%20Motivations%202-14-03.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

44 Id. at 7-8.Google Scholar

45 Farrell, , supra note 18, at 555.Google Scholar

46 Ng, & Loosemore, , supra note 32, at 2.Google Scholar

47 Sorge, Marco, The Nature of Credit Risk in Project Finance, 91 Bis Q. Rev. (December 2004).Google Scholar

48 Sorge, Marco & Gadanecz, Blaise, The Term Structure of Credit Spreads in Project Finance, 13 Int'l J. of Fin. & Econ. 68, 69 (2005).Google Scholar

49 Id. at 78.Google Scholar

50 Farrell, , supra note 18, at 550.Google Scholar

51 CBC News, Harper ‘disappointed’ by Keystone Pipeline Delay, 13 November 2011, available at: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/11/13/keystone-ioe-oliver.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

52 Lerman, David & Gaouette, Nicole, Keystone Pipeline Advances in Revised Environmental Study, Bloomberg (15 April 2011), available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-15/keystone-pipeline-advances-in-revised-environmental-study.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

53 ForestEthics, Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines: Community Opposition and Investment Risks (2010), available at: http://www.forestethics.org/downloads/Enbr_investor_brief_oct2010_Final.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

54 Phil Case, Environmental Risk Management and Corporate Lending: a Global Perspective 12 (1999).Google Scholar

55 Coulson, , supra note 35, at 9.Google Scholar

56 Conley, & Williams, , supra note 2, at 17.Google Scholar

57 See Bank Track, supra note 13.Google Scholar

58 Bank Track, Dodgy Deals Map, available at: http://www.banktrack.org/dodgydealmap (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

59 Amalric, , supra note 6, at 5.Google Scholar

60 Ng & Loosemore, supra note 32, at 5.Google Scholar

61 Richardson, Benjamin, Putting Ethics into Environmental Law: Fiduciary Duties for Ethical Investment, 46 OSGOODE HALL L. J. 243, 246, (2008).Google Scholar

63 Luhmann, Niklas, Risk: A Sociological Theory 6 (1993).Google Scholar

64 Id. at VIII.Google Scholar

65 McCarthy, Shawn, Ottawa's new anti-terrorism strategy lists eco-terrorists as threats, The Globe and Mail (6 September 2012) available at: http://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawas-new-anti-terrorism-strategy-lists-eco-extremists-as-threats/article2334975/?service=mobile (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

66 Kasperson, et al, The Social Amplification of Risk: Assessing Fifteen Years of Research and Theory, in The Social Amplification of Risk 13, 15 (Pidgeon et. al., eds., 2003).Google Scholar

67 Breakwell, & Barnett, , Social Amplification of risk and the Layering Method, in The Social Amplification of Risk 80 (Pidgeon et al. eds., 2003).Google Scholar

68 Kasperson, , supra note 66, at 13.Google Scholar

69 Id. at 13.Google Scholar

70 Ng, & Loosemore, , supra note 32, at 2.Google Scholar