¹ See, e.g., M. O'Brien Hylton, 'Socially Responsible’ Investing: Doing Good Versus Doing Well in an Inefficient Market, 42 Am. U. L. REV. 1 (1992) 1; Thornton, Rosy, Ethical Investments: A Case of Disjointed Thinking, 67 Cambridge L. J. 396, 419 (2008). Also, scholarship on German or European SRI is sometimes not available in English: see, e.g., Jan Scharlau, Socially Responsible Investment: Die deutschen und europarechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen (2009).Google Scholar

² E.g., Juravle, Carmen & Lewis, Alan, Identifying Impediments to SRI in Europe: A Review of the Practitioner and Academic Literature, 17 Bus. Ethics 285 (2008); Richardson, Benjamin J., Socially Responsible Investment Law: Regulating the Unseen Polluters (2008).Google Scholar

³ Lazonick, William & O'Sullivan, Mary, Maximising Shareholder Value: A New Ideology for Corporate Governance, 29 Econ & Soc. 13 (2000).Google Scholar

⁴ For insights into this more radical, comprehensive agenda of reform, see, e.g., Brown, Lester R., Eco-Economy: Building an Economy for the Earth (2001); Daly, Herman E. & Cobb, John, For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Towards Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future (1990); Jacobs, Michael, Green Economy: Environment, Sustainable Development and the Politics of the Future (1993).Google Scholar

⁵ For an introduction to the goals and means of SRI, see Hung-Gay, Fung, Sheryl Law & Jof Yau, Socially Responsible Investment in a Global Environment (2010); Sustainable Investing: The Art of Long Term Performance (Cary Krosinsky & Nick Robins eds., 2008); Responsible Investing in Times of Turmoil: The Future of SRI (W. Vandekerckhove, et. al., eds., 2011).Google Scholar

⁶ See News Release: Why is Biodiversity in Crisis?, IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, (3 September 2010), http://www.iucnredlist.org/news/biodiversity-crisis (last accessed 1 January 2011) (reporting that “the escalating extinction crisis shows that the diversity of nature cannot support the current pressure that humanity is placing on the planet”); U.N. Env't Programme, Global Environment Outlook GEO-4: Environment for Development 6 (2007); Global Environment Outlook, U.N. Env't Programme, http://www.unep.org/geo (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

⁷ Clak, Gordon & Wojcik, Darius, The Geography of Finance: Corporate Governance in the Global Marketplace (2007).Google Scholar

⁸ See Shiller, Robert J., Irrational Exuberance (2000); Brogle, John, The Battle for the Soul of Capitalism (2005); Jameson, Frederic, Culture and Finance Capitalism, 24 Crit. Inq. 246 (1997).Google Scholar

⁹ Rivoli, Pietra, Making a Difference or Making a Statement? Finance Research and Socially Responsible Investment, 13 Bus. Ethics Q. 271 (2003).Google Scholar

¹⁰ Triolo, Paola, Martin Palmer & Steve Waygood, A Capital Solution: Faith, Finance and Concern for a Living Planet (2000).Google Scholar

¹¹ United Nations Environment Programme-Finance Initiative (UNEPFI), The Materiality of Social, Environmental and Corporate Governance Issues in Equity Pricing (2004).Google Scholar

¹² E.g., US Social Investment Forum, Socially Responsible Investing Assets in US Top $3 Trillion; Nearly 1 Out of Every 8 Dollars under Professional Management, Press release (9 November 2010), http://www.socialinvest.org/news/releases/pressrelease.cfm?id=168.Google Scholar

¹³ US Social Investment Forum, 2005 Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the United States: A10-Year Review 9 (2006). A survey of more than 600 SRI funds, by the Natural Capital Institute, found that over 90 percent of Fortune 500 index companies are included in at least one SRI portfolio: Paul Hawken, Socially Responsible Investing (2004).Google Scholar

¹⁴ Schepers, Donald & Sethi, S. Prakash, Do Socially Responsible Funds Actually Deliver What they Promise? Bridging the Gap Between the Promise and Performance of Socially Responsible Funds, 108 Bus. & Soc. Rev. 11 (2003).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Fung, Hung-Gay, Sheryl A. Law & Jot Lau, Socially Responsible Investment in a Global Environment 46 (2010).Google Scholar

¹⁶ German Councilfor Sustainable Development, Towards a German Sustainability Code (December 2010), http://www.nachhaltigkeitsrat.de/uploads/media/RNE_Nov_2010_-_German_Sustainabiltity_Code_Dialogue_phase_en_01.pdf.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Id., 1.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Richardson, , supra note 2, at 89-101.Google Scholar

¹⁹ See http://www.unpri.org (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

²⁰ See http://www.equator-principles.com (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

²¹ Rivoli, , supra note 9.Google Scholar

²² Wallace Davidson, Dan Worell & El-Jelly, Abuzar, Influencing Managers to Change Unpopular Corporate Behavior through Boycotts and Divestitures, 34 Bus. & Soc. 171 (1995).Google Scholar

²³ Jeucken, Marcel, Sustainable Finance and Banking: The Financial Sector and the Future of the Planet (2001); Thompson, Paul, Bank Lending and the Environment: Policies and Opportunities, 16 Int'l J. Bank Mark. 243 (1998).Google Scholar

²⁴ Richardson, Benjamin J., Financing Sustainability: The New Transnational Governance of Socially Responsible Investment, 17 Ybk Int'l Env'tl L. 73 (2007).Google Scholar

²⁵ Id., 73.Google Scholar

²⁶ Shaw, Edward, Financial Deepening in Economic Development (1975); Singh, Ajit, Financial Liberalisation, Stockmarkets and Economic Development, 107 Econ. J. 771 (1997).Google Scholar

²⁷ E.g., UK's Occupational Pension Schemes (Investment) Regulations, 2005: cl. 2(3)(b)(vi)-(3)(c); Australia's Corporations Act, 2001 (Cth), para. 1013D(1)(I); France's Projet de loi sur l'épargne salariale (7 February 2001). No. 2001-152, Arts. 21, 23.Google Scholar

²⁸ Securities Exchange Commission, Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Proxy Voting Records by Registered Management Investment Companies (31 January 2003), 17 CFR Parts 239, 249, 270, & 274; Canadian Securities Administrators, National Instrument 81-106 Investment Fund Continuous Disclosure and Companion Policy 81-106CP (2005).Google Scholar

²⁹ Known as the Green Project Directive, introduced in 1995: the scheme was amended in 2002 and 2005: Regeling groenprojecten buitenland, Staatscourant 1 (2 January 2002 31; Regeling groenprojecten, Staatscourant 131 (11 July 2005): 13; see further Marcel Jeucken, Sustainable Finance and Banking: The Financial Sector and the Future of the Planet 92-94 (2001).Google Scholar

³⁰ Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-510; but the legislation was amended in 1996 to limit lenders’ potential liability: Olaf de S. Domis, New Law Finally Limits Environmental Liability, 161 Am. Banker 3 (1996).Google Scholar

³¹ Case, David, Changing Corporate Behavior through Environmental Management Systems, 31 William & Mary Env'tl L. & Pol. Rev. 7 (2006); Eric W. Orts, Reflexive Environmental Law, 89 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1127 (1995).Google Scholar

³² Vlaanderen, Netwerk, Belgium Bans Investments in Cluster Munitions, Press release (2 March 2007), http://www.netwerkvlaanderen.be (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

³³ UNEPFI Asset Management Working Group and UK Social Investment Forum, Responsible Investment in Focus: How Leading Public Pension Funds are Meeting the Challenge (2007),Google Scholar

³⁴ Williams, Cynthia, Corporate Social Responsibility in an Era of Economic Globalization, 35 U. Cal. Davis L. Rev. 705, 731 (2002).Google Scholar

³⁵ See Leonard, Geoffrey & Duerksen, Christopher, Environmental Regulation and the Location of Industry: An International Perspective, 15 Colum. J. World Bus. 52 (1980); Wilson, John, Capital Mobility and Environmental Standards: Is there a Theoretical Basis for a Race to the Bottom? in Fair Trade and Harmonization: Economic Analysis, Vol. 1, 393 (Jagdish Bhagwati & Robert E. Hudec eds., 1996).Google Scholar

³⁶ See Giovanoli, Mario, A New Architecture for the Global Financial Market: An Outline of Legal Issues, in International Monetary Law: Issues for the New Millennium 3 (Mario Giovanoli ed., 2000).Google Scholar

³⁷ See generally Carlberg, Michael, International Economic Policy Coordination (2005); Kern Alexander, Rahul Dhumale & Eatwell, John, Global Governance of Financial Systems (2006).Google Scholar

³⁸ Presti, Vincent, Barings Bar None: The Financial Service Agreement of the GATS and its Potential Impact on Derivatives Trading, 21 Maryland J. Int'l L. & Trade 145 (1997). The legal text of the GATS, including the Annex on Financial Services and the Understanding on Commitments in Financial Services, are part of the Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: see http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/final_e.htm (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

³⁹ The Agreement entered into force on 1 March 1999. See further Aaditya Mattoo, Financial Services and the WTO: Liberalization in the Developing and Transition Economies (1998).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ By way of introduction, see European Commission, Institutional Arrangements for the Regulation and Supervision of the Financial Sector (2000).Google Scholar

⁴¹ Presidency Conclusions, Lisbon European Council, March 23-24, 2000, 3 Eur. U. Bull.7 (2000).Google Scholar

⁴² The current version is Art. 11, Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union, (2008) O.J. C 115/47, which states: “Environmental protection requirements must be integrated into the definition and implementation of the Union policies and activities, in particular with a view to promoting sustainable development.” The principle of integration also appears in a weaker form in the Single European Act, in Art.130R(2) EC: “Environmental protection requirements shall be a component of the Community's other policies.” On the lack of consistency between the European Treaty level and the level of secondary law in the company and business law area, see Beate Sjafell, Towards a Sustainable European Company Law (2009).Google Scholar

⁴³ Pehle, Heinrich, Germany: Domestic Obstacles to an International Forerunner, in European Environmental Policy: The Pioneers 161 (Michael S. Andersen & Duncan Liefferink eds., 1997).Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Bauklah, Anja & Roose, Jocken, The Environmental Movement and Environmental Concern in Contemporary Germany, in The Culture of German Environmentalism: Anxieties, Visions and Realities 81 (Axel Goodbody ed., 2002).Google Scholar

⁴⁵ See Federal Returning Officer, Final Result of the Election to the German Bundestag 2009, http://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/en/bundestagswahlen/BTW_BUND_09/ergebnisse/bundesergebnisse/index.html (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

⁴⁶ These laws include Germany's Renewable Energy Sources Act, 2004 (Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz EEG) and Environmental Damage Act, 2007 (UShadG).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ See http://www.gls.de/die-gls-bank/ueber-uns/gls-bank/english-portrait.html (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Joanna Rachocka, Socially Responsible Investment in Europe 16 (2007).Google Scholar

⁴⁹ The first SRI retail fund in the US was probably the Pax World Fund, established in 1971.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ See http://www.forum-ng.org (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

⁵¹ Schaefer, Henry, Ethical Investment of German Non-profit Organizations – Conceptual Outline and Empirical Results, 13 Bus. Ethics: Euro. Rev. 269, 270 (2004).Google Scholar

⁵² See http://www.kritischeaktionaere.de (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

⁵³ Geldanlagen, Forum Nachhaltige, Marktbericht Nachhaltige Geldanlagen 2010: Deutschland, Österreich und die Schweiz 19 (2010).Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Id. Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Signatories to the Principles for Responsible Investment, http://www.unpri.org/signatories/ (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Eurosif, , European SRI Study 201 (2010).Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Id., 8.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Id., 9.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ The SRI market share in the UK is surprisingly large. However, the Eurosif study notes that of the total £938.9 billion SRI assets, compared to the total managed investment assets in the UK worth £3.4 trillion, most comprised “broad” SRI (worth £884.2 billion): id., 53.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Id., 16, 42, 43, 54.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Id., 36.Google Scholar

⁶² Schaefer, , supra note 51, 283.Google Scholar

⁶³ Eurosif, , supra note 56, at 17, 51. Interestingly, though, investment in equities has dropped from 50 percent in 2008 to 33 percent in 2010 on the European level, making bonds the favored asset (from 39 percent in 2008 to 53 percent in 2010); id., 7.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ US Social Investment Forum, 2010 Report Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the United States 40-56 (2010).Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Id., 35.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Geldanlagen, Forum Nachhaltige, Marktbericht nachhaltige Geldanlagen 2010 - Deutschland, Oesterreich und die Schweiz 21 (2010).Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Eurosif, , supra note 56, 7.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Schaefer, Henry, Wie nachhaltig ist die Kreditanlage in Deutschland? 6 (2005), http://www.unistuttgart.de/argus-responsibility/fileadmin/downloads/Wie_nachh_Geldanlage.pdf (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Fortis Investments & Federal Environmental Ministry of Germany, Occupational pensions and sustainable investments in Germany 5 (2008).Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Axel H. Boersch-Supan & Christina B. Wilke, Reforming the German Public Pension System 3 (2005). http://www.rand.org/labor/aging/rsi/rsi_papers/2006_axel1.pdf (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

⁷¹ Riedel, Silke & Schneeweiss, Antje, Chancen und Entwicklungsmoeglichkeiten fuer ein Aktives Aktionaerstum in Deutschland – eine Machbarkeitsstudie 12 (2008).Google Scholar

⁷² Boersch-Supan & Wilke, , supra note 70, 8.Google Scholar

⁷³ Id., 16.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Scharlau, , supra note 1, 112.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Law on the Reform of the pay-as-you-go-Pension System (Gesetz zur Reform der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung und zur Foerderung eines kapitalgedeckten Altersvorsorgevermoegens (AVmG)), June 29 2001, (2001) BGBl. 11310.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ The PAYG system has been shrinking, caused by the demographic shift of an ageing population with fewer workers to finance the pensions of a growing number of recipients: Boersch-Supan & Wilke, supra note 70, 4.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Bundesministerium fuer Arbeit und Soziales, Entwicklung der Riester-Rente (2010), http://www.bmas.de/portal/47362/property=pdf/2010_08_11_entwicklung_private_vorsorge_2_Quartal_2010_schaubild.pdf.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Schaefer, , supra note 68, 2.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Rottmann, Stephan, Erfolgreich investieren in gruene Geldanlagen 46-47 (2009).Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Schwietering, Timo, Treuhaendische Verantwortung und Ethisches Investment - Chancen und Zwaenge am deutschen Pensionskassenmarkt 21 (LLB dissertation, Universitaet Bayreuth, 2007).Google Scholar

⁸¹ Id., 22.Google Scholar

⁸² Id. Google Scholar

⁸³ Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband, Unterstüetzungskasse: Frei in der Vermöegensanlage (2008), http://www.vorsorgedurchblick.de/projekt01/side182.html (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

⁸⁴ To be eligible for government subsidies, investment vehicles have to guarantee payment of a life annuity payable from the date of retirement; they must not provide for lump-sum disbursements: Boersch-Supan & Wilke, supra note 70, 11.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Scharlau, , supra note 1, 113.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Deringer, Freshfields Bruckhaus, A Legal Framework for the Integration of Environmental, Social and Governance Issues into Institutional Investment (2005).Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Langbein, John, Questioning the Trust Law Duty of Loyalty: Sole Interest or Best Interest? 114 Yale L. J. 929 (2005).Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Cowan v Scargill [1985] 1 Ch. 270; Martin v. City of Edinburgh District Council [1988] SLT 329; Bishop of Oxford v. Church Commissioners for England [1992] 1 WLR 1241.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Discussed further in Richardson, Benjamin J., Do the Fiduciary Duties of Pension Funds Hinder Socially Responsible Investment? 22(2) Bank. & Fin. L. Rev. 145 (2007).Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Directive 2003/41/EC of June 3, 2003, O.J. L. 235/10.Google Scholar

⁹¹ Id., Art. 12.Google Scholar

⁹² European Parliament, Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Draft Report on the Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on the Activities of Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision, PE 295.986/AM/48-134 (8 May 2001), 52.Google Scholar

⁹³ Investment Modernization Act (Investmentmodernisierungsgesetz), 2003, para. 9(2).Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Law on the Supervision of Insurance Companies (Versicherungsaufsichtsgesetz (VAG)), 17 December 1992, (1993) BGBl. I 2, para. 54 I, 115 I 3, II; and Pension Fund Investment decree-law (Pensionsfond-Kapitalanlageverordnung (PFKapAV)), 21 December 2001, (2001) BGBl. I 4185.Google Scholar

⁹⁵ Para. 2, 3, 6, Regulation on the Investment of Assets of Insurance Companies (Verordnung ueber die Anlage des gebundenen Vermoegens von Versicherungsunternehmen (AnIV)), 20 December 2001, (2001) BGBl. I 3913.Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Deutsches Institut fuer Altersvorsorge, Wie Pensionsfonds das Geld der Versicherten anlagen (2010), http://diavorsorge.de/files/pensionsfonds_anlagestruktur.pdf (last accessed 1 January 2011); Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, Jahresbericht 2009 114 (2010).Google Scholar

⁹⁷ Scharlau, , supra note 1, 120–21.Google Scholar

⁹⁸ Para. 115 Part 4, VAG,Google Scholar

⁹⁹ Translation by Deutsche Bank Research, Responsible Investments 5 (24 June 2010), https://www.dwsinvestments.com/EN/docs/research/responsible_investments.pdf.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ Id. Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ Pensions Act, 1995; Occupational Pension Schemes (Investment) Regulations, 2005, cl. 2(3)(b)(vi)-(3)(c). The regulations were originally introduced in 1999.Google Scholar

¹⁰² Commercial Code (Handelsgesetzbuch (HGB)) as altered by the Law on Reasonable Wages of the Management Board (Vorstandsverguetungsgesetz (VorstAG) of 31 July 2009, (2009) BGBl. I 2509.Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Id., para. 289 III.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ See Accounting Law Reform Act, 2004 (Bilanzrechtsreformgesetz).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁵ Directive 2003/51/EC of June 18, 2003, O.J. L.178, 2003; and Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁶ Bundesministerium fuer Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, Was Investoren wollen - Nachhaltigkeit in der Lageberichterstattung 4 (2009).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁷ Fortis Investments & Federal Environmental Ministry of Germany, supra note 69, 9.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ Id., 10.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ Id., 12.Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ Discussed in Wheelan, Hugh, Germany in Global SRI Adoption Comparison, Responsible-Investor.Com (23 November 2007), http://www.responsible-investor.com/home/article/germany_lags_in_global_sri_adoption_comparison (last accessed on 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

¹¹¹ See Denis Cormier, Michel Magnan, & Velthoven, Barbara Van, Environmental Disclosure Quality in Large German Companies: Economic Incentives, Public Pressures or Institutional Conditions? 14 Eur. Account. Rev. 3 (2005); Guthrie, James & Parker, Lee, Corporate Social Disclosure Practice: A Comparative International Analysis, 3 Advances in Public Interest Accounting 159 (1990).Google Scholar

¹¹² Chris Gribben & Adam Faruk, Will UK Pension Funds Become More Responsible? A Survey of Trustees - 2004 (2004); Fair Pensions, UK Pension Scheme Transparency on Social, Environmental and Ethical Issues (2006).Google Scholar

¹¹³ Krewitt, Wolfram & Nitsch, Joachim, The German Renewable Energy Sources Act—An Investment into the Future Pays Off, Already Today, 28 Renewable Energy 533 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹¹⁴ Jacob, Klaus, et al., Leld Markets for Environmental Innovations 220 (2005).Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, supra note 96, 114.Google Scholar

¹¹⁶ Eurosif, , supra note 56.Google Scholar

¹¹⁷ Schaefer, , supra note 51, 270Google Scholar

¹¹⁸ Schaefer, Henry, Nachhaltiges Bankgeschaeft als Heilsbringer in der Bankenkrise? Neue Missverstaendnisse und alte Selbstverstaendnisse, Forum Wirtschaftsethik 28, 33 (2009).Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ Schaefer, , supra note 68, 8–9.Google Scholar

¹²⁰ Riedel, & Schneeweiss, , supra note 71, 13–14.Google Scholar

¹²¹ Id. Google Scholar

¹²² Schaefer, , supra note 51, 270–71.Google Scholar

¹²³ See Andreas Hackethal & Reinhard H. Schmidt. Financing Patterns: Measurement Concepts and Empirical Results (2003); Corbett, Jenny & Tim Jenkinson. The Financing of Industry, 1970-1989: An International Comparison, 10 J. Japanese & Int'l Economies 71 (1996).Google Scholar

¹²⁴ Libby Assassi, Anastasia Nesvetailova & Wigan, Duncan, Global Finance in the New Century: Deregulation and Beyond, in Global Finance in the New Century: Beyond Deregulation 1, 7 (Libby Assassi, Anastasia Nesvetailova & Duncan Wigan eds., 2007).Google Scholar

¹²⁵ Cioffi, John W., Corporate Governance Reform, Regulatory Politics, and the Foundations of Finance Capitalism in the United States and Germany, 7 German L.J. 533, 540 (2006).Google Scholar

¹²⁶ Riedel, & Schneeweiss, , supra note 71, 15.Google Scholar

¹²⁷ Kengelbach, Jens & Roos, Alexander, Entflechtung der Deutschland AG – Empirische Untersuchung der Reduktion von Kapital- und Personalverflechtungen zwischen deutschen boersennotierten Gesellschaften, M. & A. Rev. 11, 11 (2006).Google Scholar

¹²⁸ Riedel, & Schneeweiss, , supra note 71, 15.Google Scholar

¹²⁹ See Second Financial Market Promotion Act (Gesetz ueber den Wertpapierhandel und zur Aenderung boersenrechtlicher und wertpapierrechtlicher Vorschriften (2. FFG)), 26 July 1994, (1994) BGBl. I 1749; Law on Control and Transparency in the Commercial Sector (Gesetz zur Kontrolle und Transparenz im Unternehmensbereich (KonTraG)), 30 April 1998, (1998) BGBl. I 768; Law to facilitate the Raising of Capital (Kapitalaufnahmeerleichterungsgesetz (KapAEG)), April 20, 1998, (1998) BGBl. I 707; Law on the further Reform of Corporation Law and Accounting Law (Gesetz zur weiteren Reform des Aktien- und Bilanzrechts, zu Transparenz und Publizitaet (TransPuG)), 26 July 2002, (2002) BGBl. I 2681; Law on the Improvement of Investor Protection (Anlageschutzverbesserungsgesetz (AnSVG)), 29 October 2004, (2004) BGBl. I 2630.Google Scholar

¹³⁰ Kengelbach, & Roos, , supra note 127, 16.Google Scholar

¹³¹ Clark, & Wójcik, supra note 8, 128–29.Google Scholar

¹³² Riedel, & Schneeweiss, , supra note 71, 15.Google Scholar

¹³³ Schaefer, , supra note 68, 9.Google Scholar

¹³⁴ Schaefer, , supra note 51, 271.Google Scholar

¹³⁵ Such corporations usually have to employ more than 2000 employees, para. 1, Law on Codetermination (Mitbestimmungsgesetz (MitbestG)) of 4 May 1976, (1976) BGBl. I 1153,Google Scholar

¹³⁶ Id., para. 7.Google Scholar

¹³⁷ Work councils can be elected by employees in companies which employ at least five employees, para. 1, Law on Work Councils (Betriebsverfassungsgesetz (BetrVG)), 25 September 2001, (2001) BGBl. I 2518; see further John Addison, Claus Schnabel & Joachim Wagner, Works Councils in Germany: Their Effects on Establishment Performance, 53 Ox. Econ. Papers 659 (2001).Google Scholar

¹³⁸ Schaefer, , supra note 51, 271.Google Scholar

¹³⁹ Klaus Hopt, J. & Leyens, Patrick C., Board Models in Europe. Recent Developments of Internal Corporate Governance Structures in Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy 7 (2004).Google Scholar

¹⁴⁰ Waring, Peter & Edwards, Tony, Socially Responsible Investment: Explaining its Uneven Development and Human Resource Management Consequences, 16(3) Corp. Gov. 135, 137 (2008).Google Scholar

¹⁴¹ Cioffi, , supra note 125, 551.Google Scholar

¹⁴² Schaefer, , supra note 51, 270–71.Google Scholar

¹⁴³ There were approximately 15,000 stock corporations in 2005: Ulrich Noack & Dirk Zetzsche, Corporate Governance Reform in Germany: The Second Decade, Euro Bus. L. Rev. 1033, 1034 (2005).Google Scholar

¹⁴⁴ Frankfurt, Boerse, Aktiensuche (2010), http://www.boerse-frankfurt.de/DE/index.aspx?pageID=30.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁵ Emmons, William & Schmid, Frank, Universal Banking Rights, Control Rights and Corporate Finance in Germany, FRBSL 19, 29 (1998).Google Scholar

¹⁴⁶ Noack, & Zetzsche, , supra note 143, 1034.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁷ Richardson, Benjamin J., Greening the Financial Sector: Legal Reforms in the European Union, 7 Ybk Int'l Env'tl L. 159, 168 (2007).Google Scholar

¹⁴⁸ Cioffi, , supra note 125, 540.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁹ Id. Google Scholar

¹⁵⁰ Noack, & Zetzsche, , supra note 143, 1036.Google Scholar

¹⁵¹ Riedel, & Schneeweiss, , supra note 71, 15.Google Scholar

¹⁵² Cioffi, , supra note 125, 540–41.Google Scholar

¹⁵³ Emmons, & Schmid, , supra note 145, 28.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁴ Cioffi, , supra note 125, 540.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁵ See Sinn, Hans-Werner, Germany's Economic Unification: An Assessment after Ten Years, 10 Rev In't Econ. 113 (2002).Google Scholar

¹⁵⁶ Among the most important laws were the Second Financial Market Promotion Act (Gesetz ueber den Wertpapierhandel und zur Aenderung boersenrechtlicher und wertpapierrechtlicher Vorschriften (2 FFG)), 26 July 1994, (1994) BGBl. I 1749.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁷ Law on the Improvement of Investor Protection (Anlageschutzverbesserungsgesetz (AnSVG)), Oct. 29, 2004, (2004) BGBl. I 2630.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁸ Law on the Introduction of International Accounting Standards and on the Enhancenment of the Quality of Annual Audits (Gesetz zur Einfuehrung internationaler Rechnungslegungsstandards und zur Sicherung der Qualitaet der Abschlusspruefung; Bilanzrechtsreformgesetz (BilReG)), 4 December 2004, (2004) BGBl. I 3166.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁹ Richardson, , supra note 147, 168.Google Scholar

¹⁶⁰ Streeck, Wolfgang, German Capitalism: Does It Exist? Can It Survive? 2 New Polit. Econ. 23 (1997).Google Scholar

¹⁶¹ Law on Control and Transparency (Gesetz zur Kontrolle und Transparenz im Unternehmensbereich (KonTraG)), 30 April 1998, (1998) BGBl. I 786.Google Scholar

¹⁶² Law on Stock Corporations (Aktiengesetz (AktG)), 6 September 1965, (1965) BGBl. I 1089.Google Scholar

¹⁶³ Para. 139, AktG.Google Scholar

¹⁶⁴ Cioffi, , supra note 125, 554.Google Scholar

¹⁶⁵ Noack, & Zetzsche, , supra note 143, 1039.Google Scholar

¹⁶⁶ Id. Google Scholar

¹⁶⁷ Id, 1038.Google Scholar

¹⁶⁸ Law on Corporate Integrity and Modernisation of the Right of Resolution-Annulment (Gesetz zur Unternehmensintegritaet und Modernisierung des Anfechtungsrechts (UMAG)), 22 September 2005, (2005) BGBl. I 2802.Google Scholar

¹⁶⁹ Schaefer, Hans, Shareholder Activism und Corporate Governance, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht 900, 900 (2007).Google Scholar

¹⁷⁰ Enshrined in para. 127a, AktG.Google Scholar

¹⁷¹ Naruisch, Till & Liepe, Fabian, Latest Developments in the German Law on Public Companies by the Act on Corporate Integrity and Modernisation of the Right of Resolution-Annulment (UMAG) – Shareholder Activism and Directors’ Liability Reloaded, J. Bus. L. 225, 236 (2007).Google Scholar

¹⁷² Law on the Implementation of the Directive of Shareholder Rights (Gesetz zur Umsetzung der Aktionaersrichtlinie (ARUG)), 30 July 2009, (2009) BGBl. I 2479; and see Directive 2007/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies.Google Scholar

¹⁷³ Drinhausen, Florian & Keinath, Astrid, Auswirkungen des ARUG auf die kuenftige Hauptversammlungspraxis, Betriebs Berater 2322, 2322 (2009); see para.124a 1 Nr. 1, 3, AktG.Google Scholar

¹⁷⁴ Para. 118 I 2, AktG.Google Scholar

¹⁷⁵ Zetzsche, Dirk, Die neue Aktionaersrechte-Richtlinie: Auf dem Weg zur Virtuellen Hauptversammlung, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht 686, 692 (2007).Google Scholar

¹⁷⁶ See para. 20-29 Investment Code (Investmentgesetz (InvG)), 15 December 2003, (2003) BGBl. I 2676.Google Scholar

¹⁷⁷ See para. 135 14, III 3, AktG.Google Scholar

¹⁷⁸ Riedel, & Schneeweiss, , supra note 71, at 20.Google Scholar

¹⁷⁹ Para. 135 III 3, AktG.Google Scholar

¹⁸⁰ Id., para. 135 15.Google Scholar

¹⁸¹ Id., para. 76 I.Google Scholar

¹⁸² Id., para. 111 I.Google Scholar

¹⁸³ Scharlau, , supra note 1, at 147.Google Scholar

¹⁸⁴ Para. 131 I 1, Aktiengesetz.Google Scholar

¹⁸⁵ Id., para. 289 III, 315 I 4, HGB.Google Scholar

¹⁸⁶ Id., para. 176 I 2, 175 II.Google Scholar

¹⁸⁷ Id., para. 131 III.Google Scholar

¹⁸⁸ Id., para. 124 IV 2, 126.Google Scholar

¹⁸⁹ Id., para. 122 I. This section also provides that a company's articles of incorporation may deviate from this standard to set a lower percentage of shareholder votes necessary to call a meeting.Google Scholar

¹⁹⁰ Id., para. 122 II.Google Scholar

¹⁹¹ Id., para. 76 1.Google Scholar

¹⁹² Id. Google Scholar

¹⁹³ Id., para. 119 I Nr. 1.Google Scholar

¹⁹⁴ Id., para. 53a.Google Scholar

¹⁹⁵ Para. 13 I, Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz (WpHG)), 9 September 1998, (1998) BGBl. I 2708.Google Scholar

¹⁹⁶ See para. 13 I 3 Nr. 1, WpHG; Schaefer, supra note 169, 901.Google Scholar

¹⁹⁷ The relevant part of the Code provides “The Management Board is responsible for independently managing the enterprise with the objective of sustainable creation of value and in the interest of the enterprise, thus taking into account the interests of the shareholders, its employees and other stakeholders” (emphasis added).Google Scholar

¹⁹⁸ Deipenbrock, Gudula, Sustainable Development, the Interest(s) of the Company and the Role of the Board from the Perspective of a German Aktiengesellschaft, University of Oslo Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2010-02, 22-23 (2010).Google Scholar

¹⁹⁹ Schaefer, , supra note 118, 271.Google Scholar

²⁰⁰ Richardson, , supra note 147, 167–68.Google Scholar

²⁰¹ Hackethal, Andreas, German Banks and Banking Structure, in The German Financial System 71, 71 (Jan P. Krahnen & Reinhard H Schmidt eds., 2004); Edwards, Jeremy & Fischer, Klaus, Banks, Finance and Investment in Germany (1994).Google Scholar

²⁰² Onetti, Alberto & Pisoni, Alessia, Ownership and Control in Germany: Do Cross-Shareholdings Reflect Bank Control on Large Companies? 6 Corp. Ownership & Control 54, 73 (2009).Google Scholar

²⁰³ Goetzl, Stephan & Gros, Juergen, Regionalbanken seit 160 Jahren: Die Volksbanken und Raiffeisenbanken – Merkmale, Strukturen, Leistungen 12 (2009).Google Scholar

²⁰⁴ Cioffi, , supra note 125, 551.Google Scholar

²⁰⁵ See Richardson, , supra note 147, 168.Google Scholar

²⁰⁶ Allan Brunner, et al., Germany s Three-Pillar Banking System: Cross Country Perspectives in Europe 2 (2004); Bundesbank, Deutsche, Die Ertragslage der deutschen Kreditinstitute, September 2010 12 (2010), http://www.bundesbank.de/download/statistik/bankenstatistik/guv_tab1.pdf (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

²⁰⁷ See para. 2 I-III, Law on Savings Banks of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia (Sparkassengesetz (SpkG)), 18 November 2008, (2008) GV NRW 696/ SGV NRW 764.Google Scholar

²⁰⁸ Hackethal, , supra note 201, 79.Google Scholar

²⁰⁹ See para. 1 I, Law on Cooperatives (Genossenschaftsgesetz (GenG)), Oct. 16, 2006, (2006) BGBl. I 2230.Google Scholar

²¹⁰ See http://www.umweltbank.de (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

²¹¹ See http://www.ethikbank.de (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

²¹² See http://www.gls.de/die-gls-bank/ueber-uns/gls-bank/english-portrait.html (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

²¹³ Marcel Jeucken &Jan Bouma, The Changing Environment of Banks, 27 Greener Man. Int'l 21 (1999); European Association of Co-operative Banks, Corporate Social Responsibility: The Performance of Cooperative Banks (2005).Google Scholar

²¹⁴ Busch, Timo & Orbach, Thomas, Zukunftsfaehiger Finanzsektor: Die Nachhaltigkeitsleistung von Banken und Versicherungen 35-36 (2003), http://www.wupperinst.org/uploads/tx_wibeitrag/WP129.pdf (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

²¹⁵ Id. Google Scholar

²¹⁶ Id., 40.Google Scholar

²¹⁷ Id., 41-42.Google Scholar

²¹⁸ Ulf Schrader, Ignorant Advice - Customer Advisory Service for Ethical Investment Funds, 15 Bus. Strat. Env't 200, 200 (2006).Google Scholar

²¹⁹ Von Marvin Oppong und Peter Wensierski, Banken: Sündige Rendite, Spiegel (Sept. 12, 2010); http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/0,1518,717173-2,00.html (last accessed 12 February 2011).Google Scholar

²²⁰ There are a few examples in other jurisdictions, which illustrate the legal risks. For example, in 2008 the US Securities Exchange Commission reached a US$500,000 civil settlement with Pax World Management for its negligent failure to comply with its self-imposed SRI restrictions, in violation of securities regulations: US Securities Exchange Commission, In the Matter of Pax World Management Corp., Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-13107 (July, 2008).Google Scholar

²²¹ Perhaps the most famous judgment regarding the liability of financial advisers for misinforming clients about investments is the “Bond” case, decided by the German Supreme Court: BGH 6 July 1993, BGHZ 123, 126. According to the Court, the recommended investment advice should be geared towards the personal circumstances of the client and thus be suitable for that client. If the bank lacks information concerning these facts about the client, it is obliged to obtain such information, ruled the Court. There has been considerable recent case law relating to clients suing their banks for failure to advise about the risks associated with Lehman Brothers investments: e.g., LG Potsdam of 24 June 2009 (8 O. 61/09); LG Hamburg of 10 July 2009 (329 O. 44/09). See further about the Lehman litigation, Klaus Maerker, Fehlerhafte Anlageberatung beim Verkauf von Lehman-Zertifikaten - eine Zwischenbilanz, 10 Neue Juristische Online-Zeitschrift 524 (2010).Google Scholar

²²² See Coester, Michael & Markesimis, Basil, Liability of Financial Experts in German and American Law: An Exercise in Comparative Methodology, 51 AM. J. COMP. L. 275 (2003).Google Scholar

²²³ Notably, Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 Apr. 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC, OJEC 2004 L 145/1. See further, Olha O. Cherednychenko, European Securities Regulation, Private Law and the Investment Firm-Client Relationship, 5 Euro Rev. Private L. 925 (2009).Google Scholar

²²⁴ See para. 1, SpkVO.Google Scholar

²²⁵ Law on Banks and other Providers of Financial Services (Gesetz ueber das Kreditwesen (KWG)), Sept 9, 1998, (1998) BGBl. I 2776.Google Scholar

²²⁶ Goetzl, & Gros, , supra note 203, 100.Google Scholar

²²⁷ BayernLB und WestLB beraten ueber Fusion, Der Tagesspiegel (Sept. 20, 2010), http://www.tagesspiegel.de/wirtschaft/kreise-bayernlb-und-westlb-beraten-ueber-fusion/1937970.html (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

²²⁸ Schaefer, , supra note 123, 36.Google Scholar

²²⁹ Deutscher Sparkassen- und Giroverband, Zufriedene Kunden durch hochwertige Beratung – Das Selbstverstaendnis der Sparkassen in der Anlageberatung (2010); Deutscher Sparkassen- und Giroverband, Vertrauen gewinnt - Lehren aus der Finanzkrise (2010).Google Scholar

²³⁰ Eurosif, , supra note 56, 35.Google Scholar

²³¹ Gillmann, Barbara, Aktien sind genauso out wie Drogen, Handelsblatt (2010), http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/anlagestrategie/shell-studie-aktien-sind-genauso-out-wiedrogen;2655342 (last visited Jan. 1, 2011); Konservative Geldanlagen im Aufwaertstrend, Geld-Magazin (2009), http://www.geld-magazin.de/finanzen/sparen-anlegen/sparen-anlegen-einzelansicht/article/konservative-geldanlagen-im-aufwaertstrend.html (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

²³² Schaefer, , supra note 68, 8–9.Google Scholar

²³³ Waring, & Edwards, , supra note 140, 141.Google Scholar