No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Peer Zumbansen (edt.), Zwangsarbeit im Dritten Reich: Erinnerung und Verantwortung; juristische und zeithistorische Betrachtungen (NS-forced labor in The Third Reich: Remembrance and Resposibility; Legal and Historical Observations) Nomos (2002)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Legal Culture
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2004 by German Law Journal GbR
References
1 It was this first case filed against German banks (and it turned out to be the last to be settled as Judge Kram of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York) that almost brought the Agreement between German industry and the German and US governments to falter. The case was finally terminated on 17 May 2001, see: http://laws.findlaw.com/2nd/013017.html (visited 25 June 2004).Google Scholar
2 57 F. Supp.2d 248, 1999 U.S. Dist. Lexis 13864; compare Safferling, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1922 (2000) and Reinisch, IPRax 32 (2000).Google Scholar
3 Juristische Rundschau 6 (2002), reprinted in the reviewed book on p. 233.Google Scholar
4 57 F. Supp.2d 248, 1999 U.S. Dist. Lexis 13864; see in the book at p. 208–209 and p. 237.Google Scholar
5 BGBl. II 1953, 338.Google Scholar
6 See, in the reviewed book p. 238–244.Google Scholar
7 Foundation Law of 2 August 2000, BGBl. I 2000, 1263.Google Scholar
8 Supra, note 5.Google Scholar
9 Adler, and Zumbansen, , in the reviewed book at p. 392.Google Scholar
10 Compare, e.g., the book by Peer's future colleague at Osgoode Hall Law School, C. Scott, Torture as Tort. Comparative Perspectives on the Development of Transnational Human Rights Litigation (2001).Google Scholar
You have
Access