¹ Prosecutor v. Furundzija, IT-95-17A-T (I.C.T.Y. 10 Dec. 1998), reprinted in 38 I.L.M. 317 (1999) (identifying emerging norms of jus cogens).Google Scholar

² The Schooner Exchange v. M'Faddon, 12 U.S. (7 Cranch) 116 (1812) (sovereign immunity in domestic courts).Google Scholar

³ Al-Adsani v. United Kingdom, 34 Eur. Ct. H.R. 29, (2001) judgment of 21 Nov. 2001 (ECHR); see Markus Rau, After Pinochet: Foreign Sovereign Immunity in Respect of Serious Human Rights Violations – The Decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the Al-Adsani Case, 3 German L. J. No. 6 (1 June 2002), at http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=160.Google Scholar

⁴ Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No. 3), [1999] 2 All E.R. 97, 188 (per Lord Phillips, concurring).Google Scholar

⁵ But see, W. Michael Reisman, Coercion and Self-Determination: Construing Article 2(4), 78 Am. J. Int'l. L. 642 (1984) (“A sine qua non for any action – coercive or otherwise – I submit, is the maintenance of minimum order in a precarious international system.”); See also, National Security Strategy of the United States, http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html (“We will defend the peace by fighting terrorists and tyrants”); cf. Erahim Afsah, Creed, Cabal, or Conspiracy – The Origins of the current Neo-Conservative Revolution in US Strategic Thinking, 4 German L. J. No. 9, 901-923 (1 September 2003), at http://www.germanlawjournal.com/pdf/Vol04No09/PDF_Vol_04_No_09_901-923_SI_Afsah.pdf.Google Scholar

⁶ Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States), 1986 I.C.J. 14, ¶¶ 177, 183-185 (taking U.N. Charter article 2(4) into account in identifying newly emergent custom prohibiting armed force).Google Scholar

⁷ International Law Commission, Codification of the Law of Treaties, 2 Y.B. Int'l.L. Comm. 247 (1966).Google Scholar

⁸ Declaration Concerning Friendly Relations Among States, G.A. Res. 2625, U.N. GAOR, 25th Sess., Supp. No. 28, U.N. Doc. A/8028r, (1970).Google Scholar

⁹ Nicaragua Case, supra note 6 ¶ 193 (“…the inherent right (or ‘droit naturel') which any State possesses in the event of an armed attack, covers both collective and individual self-defence.”). 1 Blackstone's Commentaries 125 (defining ‘natural liberty’ as “[t]he right which nature gives to all mankind…, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and so as not to interfere with an equal exercise of the same rights by other men.”).Google Scholar

¹⁰ K. Vonnegut, Jr., Slaughterhouse-Five 5 (New York 1969).Google Scholar

¹¹ H. Bloom, Introduction to Kurt Vonnegut 1 (H. Bloom ed., Chelsea, 2000) (“On 19 December 1944, Kurt Vonnegut was captured by the Germans during the Battle of the Bulge; he was twenty-two years old. Sent to Dresden, he survived the firebombing of the city on February 13-14, 1945, in which 135,000 Germans were killed. That is the biographical context (in part) for the novel, Slaughterhouse-Five, or The Children's Crusade (1969)”).Google Scholar

¹² Klinkowitz, J., Kurt Vonnegut: Public Spokesman, in The Vonnegut Chronicles: Interviews and Essays 70 (P.J. Reed & M. Leeds eds., Westport 1996) (“[T]he Dresden bombing is related in its victimization to bombings in Cambodia, Vietnam…”).Google Scholar

¹³ See, e.g., T. Franck, Who Killed Article 2(4)?, 64 Am J. Int'l L. 809 (1970).Google Scholar

¹⁴ Henkin, L., The Reports of the Death of Article 2(4) are Greatly Exaggerated, 65 Am. J. Int'l L. 544 (1971) (describing Thomas Franck as “pathologist for the ills of the international body politic”).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Vonnegut, supra note 10, at 3.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Freese, P., Vonnegut's Invented Religions as Sense-Making Systems, in Reed & Leeds, supra note 12, at 155.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Libman v. The Queen, 1985 2 S.C.R. 178, ¶ 17 (Historically, English courts considering international law “have taken different stances at different times and the general result, as several writers have stated, is one of doctrinal confusion…”).Google Scholar

¹⁸ Reed, P.J., Writer as Character: Kilgore Trout, in Bloom, supra note 11, at 111.Google Scholar

¹⁹ See, e.g., Austro-German Customs Regime Case (Advisory Opinion), 1931 P.C.I.J. No. 41, 4, 12 (“Treaty [of Saint-Germain] imposed upon Austria, who in principle has sovereign control over her own independence, escept with the consent of the council of the League of Nations.”).Google Scholar

²⁰ Broer, L.R., Images of the Shaman in the Works of Kurt Vonnegut, in Bloom, supra note 11, at 102.Google Scholar

²¹ Austin, , The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, reprinted in Henkin, et al., International Law 11 (West 1980).Google Scholar

²² The Paquete Habana, 175 U.S. 677, 700 (1900).Google Scholar

²³ SCOR Res. 1441, U.N. SCOR., 57th Sess., S/Res/1441 (2002).Google Scholar

²⁴ UNCHR Res. 2002/8, U.N. CHR, 58^th Sess., 39^th meeting, (2002).Google Scholar

²⁵ Id., article 1 (“Decides that Iraq has been and remains in material breach …”).Google Scholar

²⁶ Id., article 2 (“Decides … to afford Iraq, by this resolution, a final opportunity to comply …”).Google Scholar

²⁷ Id., article 13 (“Recalls … that the Council has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations”).Google Scholar

²⁸ E/CN.4/2002/L.16, U.N. CHR, 58^th Sess., Comm. on H.R. Agenda Item 8, (draft of 9 April 2002) (“Affirms the legitimate right of the Palestinian people to resist the Israeli occupation by any available means …”).Google Scholar

²⁹ For a review of the arguments on either side of the international law debate, see A. Ehlert, Between Empire and Community: the United States and Multilateralism 2001-2003, 21 Berkley J. Int.l L. 721 (2003); Falk, R., Rediscovering International Law After September 11^th , 16 Temp. Int. & Comp. L. J. 359 (2002); Hannum, H., Iraq, U.S. and the War on Terror: Bellum Americanum, 27 Fletcher J. World Aff. 29 (2003); Scott, Craig, Iraq and the Serious Consequences of Word Games: Language, Violence and Responsibility in the Security Council, 3 German L. J. No. 11 (1 November 2002), at http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=209. For a constitutional law analysis of the U.S. use of military force in Iraq, see Report: the Legality and Constitutionality of the President's Authority to Initiate an Invasion of Iraq, 41 Colum. J. Transnat'l L.15 (2002).Google Scholar

³⁰ K. Vonnegut, Jr., Breakfast of Champions 202 (New York 1973).Google Scholar

³¹ On the relationship between international law and other modes of analysis of international relationships and defense policy, see T. Graham, Jr., Is International Law Relevant to Arms Control: National Self-Defense, International Law, and Weapons of Mass Destruction, 4 Chi. J. Int'l L. 1 (2003).Google Scholar

³² Senate Approves Iraq War Resolution, 11 October 2002, at CNN.com.Google Scholar

³³ SCOR Res. 687, U.N. SCOR, 2981^st meeting, April 1991 (requiring Iraq to “unconditionally accept the destruction, removal or rendering harmless” of its chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons programs).Google Scholar

³⁴ Leicester, J., France, Russia Vow No Iraq War Approval, Miami Herald, March 5, 2003, available at Herald.com; France, Germany, Russia to Nix War Vote, ABC News, March 5, 2003, available at ABCNEWS.comGoogle Scholar

³⁵ Kaplan, F., Resolution Dissolution: How the U.S. and France Botched U.N. Resolution 1441, Slate, March 6, 2003, at http://slate.msn.com/id/2079746/.Google Scholar

³⁶ L'Irak se réconcile avec le Koweït et cherche des protections face à la menace améicaine, Le Monde, 30 March 2002.Google Scholar

³⁷ Economist Intelligence Unit, Country Report: Saudi Arabia, 3 (November 2002).Google Scholar

³⁸ Trade Volume to be Increased to $310m by 2003, Jordan Times, November 22-23, 2002.Google Scholar

³⁹ International Crisis Group, Voices from the Iraqi Street, Iraq Briefing, 3 (4 December 2002) (“The efficacy of this kind of [pre-war Iraqi] diplomacy is debatable. What is less so is that it demonstrates Baghdad's determination to avoid a confrontation that it knows may be its last.”).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Kaplan, , supra note 35.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Id.Google Scholar

⁴² U.S. Department of State, Office of the Spokesman, Iraq Arms Declaration Has Gaps, Omissions, Powell Charges, (18 December 2002) at: http://www.usembassy.it/file2002_12/alia/a2121801.htm (last visited: 27 April 2004). (“Iraq was given an opportunity in UN Resolution 1441 to cooperate with the international community, to stop deceiving the world with respect to its weapons of mass destruction…We are not encouraged that they have gotten the message or will cooperate based on what we have seen so far in the declaration…”).Google Scholar

⁴³ Iraq – Statement by Fr.-F.R.G.-Russ., Spécial France-Diplomatie: Irak, (5 March 2003), at: http://special.diplomatie.gouv.fr/article69.html (last visited: 30 January 2004) (“The destruction of the Al-Samoud missiles has started and is making progress; the Iraqis are providing biological and chemical information; the interviews with Iraqi scientists are continuing.”).Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Witt, H., Iraq Disclosure Allows Hussein, Bush to Play for Time, Chicago Tribune, 7 December 2002, at: http//www.macon.com/mld/macon/news/politics/4690146.htm (last visited: 27 April 2004).Google Scholar

⁴⁵ “Saddam Hussein's Games: Interview with Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw” Sky News, Wednesday, 2 October 2002, at http://www.fco.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarketXcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1007029391629&a=KArticle&aid=1033555897233 (last visited: 27 April 2004). Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1007029391629&a=KArticle&aid=1033555897233.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Partial Test Ban Treaty, 1963, 480 U.N.T.S. 43; 1964 U.K.T.S. 3 (1964), in force 1963. For a history of the controversy over atmospheric nuclear testing by the United States in the area of Eniwetok Atoll in U.S. administered Trust Territory, which led to the initial discussions of a treaty to ban such testing, see 4 White 553 et seq. See also, Resolution on Nuclear Tests on the High Seas, Sea Conference Records, vol. II, p. 24, 101 (1958) (referring the question of nuclear tests to the General Assembly “for appropriate action”).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Office of the President of the French Republic, (8 June 1974), reprinted in D.J. Harris, Cases and Materials on International Law 775 (5^th ed., London 1998).Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Nuclear Test (Australia v. France; New Zealand v. France), 1974 I.C.J. Rep. 253.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Id. at para. 43.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ North Sea Continental Shelf (Germany v. Denmark; Germany v. Netherlands), 1969 I.C.J. Rep. 3, para. 72 (the Geneva Convention “has generated a rule which, while only conventional or contractual in its origin, has since passed into the general corpus of international law, and is now accepted as such by the opinion juris‥.).Google Scholar

⁵¹ Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969, 1155 U.N.T.S. 331; 8 I.L.M. 679 (1969); 63 A.J.I.L. 875 (1969), produced by the U.N. Conference on the Law of Treaties, pursuant to G.A. Resolutions 2166 (XXI) of 5 December 1966 and 2287 (XXII) of 6 December 1967.Google Scholar

⁵² See International Law Commission Draft Articles, 1966, 2 Y.B.I.L.C. 10 (“The restriction of the use of the term “treaty” in the draft articles to international agreements expressed in writing is not intended to deny the legal force of oral agreements under international law…”).Google Scholar

⁵³ Legal Status of Eastern Greenland (Denmark v. Norway), 1933 P.C.I.J. Rep., Series A/B, No. 53 (Norwegian Foreign Minister's declaration of lack of interest in Greenland taken as enforceable agreement as to Danish sovereignty).Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Fitzmaurice, G., The Foundations of the Authority of International Law and the Problem of Enforcement, 19 Mod. L. Rev. 1 (1956) (“The real foundation of the authority of international law resides similarly in the fact that the States making up the international society recognize it as binding upon them…”). Lotus (France v. Turkey), 1927 P.C.I.J. Rep. Series A, No. 10 (“The rules of law binding upon States therefore emanate from their own free will as expressed in conventions or by usages generally accepted as expressing principles of law…”).Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Nuclear Test, supra note 49, at para 51.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Id. at para 43.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ On the principle of pacta sunt servanda see generally Chorzow Factory (Jusridiction), [1927] P.C.I.J., Ser. A, No. 9, p. 21 (“pacta defined as “a principle of international law that the breach of an [international] engagement involves an obligation to make reparation in an adequate form.”). See also the International Law Commission's Commentary on Article 2(2) of the U.N. Charter (good faith obligations), [1966] 2 Ybk. I.L.C. 211 (“…the principle of good faith is a legal principle which forms an integral part of the rule pacta sunt servanda.”).Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Nuclear Test, supra note 49, at para 46.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Case Concerning Rights of Nationals of the United States of America in Morocco (France v. U.S.), 1952 I.C.J. Rep. 176.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ International Law Commission, Declaration of Rights and Duties of States (1949), article 13, in Henkin, et al., International Law 114 (St. Paul 1982).Google Scholar

⁶¹ See Shufeldt Claim (U.S. v. Guatemala), [1930], 2 U.N. Rep. Int. Arb. Awards 1079.Google Scholar

⁶² See Norwegian Shipowners’ Claims (Norway v. U.S.), [1922] 1 U.N. Rep. Int. Arb. Awards 307.Google Scholar

⁶³ Statement of Secretary of State Bayard, [1887] U.S. Foreign Rel. 751-753.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ K. Vonnegut, Jr., Sirens of Titan (New York 1977) (scientist crashes space ship and becomes an orbiting telegraphic being, landing on Earth once every 59 days).Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Nuclear Test Case, supra note 48, ¶ 46.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ The Schooner Exchange v. McFaddon, supra note 2.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ K. Vonnegut, Welcome to the Monkey House xvi (New York1998), (quoting a New Yorker magazine review of God Bless You Mr. Rosewater). See also Vonnegut supra note 10, at 19, where the book is described by Vonnegut himself as “short and jumbled and jangled”.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Vonnegut supra note 10, at 38.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Quoted in W.R. Allen, Conversations with Kurt Vonnegut 56 (Jackson 1988).Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Reisman, W.M., supra note 5 (describing the movement from the pre-U.N. Charter to the post-U.N. Charter law governing the use of force).Google Scholar

⁷¹ Vonnegut, supra note 10, at 117.Google Scholar

⁷² Rice, C., Why We Know Iraq is Lying, New York Times, 23 January 2003, at www.whitehouse/releases/2003/01/20030123-1.html.Google Scholar

⁷³ Id.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Id. (placing the political stalemate on the shoulders of “Saddam Hussein and his son Qusay, who controls the Special Security Organization”).Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Id. Allegations of fraudulent conduct also form a fundamental part of the Rice complaint: “…Iraq has filed a false declaration to the United Nations which amounts to a 12,200 page lie.”Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Id.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Norwegian Loans Case (France v. Norway), 1957 I.C.J. 9 (no obligation to answer an international claim or accusation except “upon the determination by the Government accepting the Optional Clause…”).Google Scholar

⁷⁸ See, e.g., France: Give U.N. Weapons Inspectors Data, New York Times, 8 January 2003, at www.truthout.org/docs_02/011003B.fr.data.htm (“France asked Security Council members Wednesday to deliver ‘specific information’ about Iraqi weapons programs to U.N. inspectors – a request aimed at the United States and Britain who claim they have evidence of clandestine Iraqi programs.”).Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Tehran Times, 27 January 2003 (“Only the people of Iraq have the right to determine their future and decide what kind of government they want.”), at www.worldpress.org/Mideast/918.cfm.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ For a review of the U.S. and U.K.–led occupation of Iraq from the perspective of the Arab world, see Iraq Under Occupation, Aljazeera, at http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/8245212D-39CC-4E6E-80FF-2E1F29F72BC5.htm. For the view from the U.S. government, see, Iraq: Security, U.S. Department of State, International Information Programs, at http://usinfo.state.gov/mena/middle_east_north_africa/iraq/iraq_security.html.Google Scholar

⁸¹ U.N. Charter art. 2, para. 4, (“All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force…”); See I. Brownlie, International Law and the Use of Force by States 275 (1963), (prohibition on force is centerpiece of law of the U.N. Charter).Google Scholar

⁸² For a list of 65 Security Council resolutions condemning Israeli actions in the occupied territories from the 1950s to the 1990s, see A List of United Nations Resolutions, Middle East News and World Report, at http://www.middleeastnews.com/unresolutionslist.html.Google Scholar

⁸³ Responsibility to Protect, The Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, at http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/iciss-ciise/report2-en.asp.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ D'Amato, A., Nicaragua and International Law: the ‘Academic’ and the ‘Real', 79 Am. J. Int'l L. 657 (1985).Google Scholar

⁸⁵ On the acceptance of Palestinians as a self-determination unit, see G.A. Res. ES-7/2, U.N. GAOR, 7^th Emergency Sess., Supp. No. 1, at 3 (1980).Google Scholar

⁸⁶ See Secretary-General's Report, S/22464 (1991); U.N. SCOR at 690, 29 April 1991 (establishing a United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara – MINURSO).Google Scholar

⁸⁷ See Algiers Agreement, 5 August 1979 (Republic of Mauritania and Frente POLISARIO), at www.wsahara.net/algiers.html.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ See Declaration of Principles on Western Sahara by Spain, Morocco, and Mauritania (Madrid Agreement), 14 November 1975, at www.wsahara.net/maccords.html (“…Spain will proceed forthwith to institute a temporary administration in the Territory, in which Morocco and Mauritania will participate in collaboration with the Djamaa (assembly of Saharawi notables)”).Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle (New York 1967).Google Scholar

⁹⁰ For a description of the Jenin fighting, see Sharon Vows to Fight On, BBC News, 10 April 2002, at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1918861/stm; For political background, see, Palestinian Support for Suicide Bombers, BBC News, 28 June 2002, at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2072851.stm; see also The Battle of Jenin, Time, at http://www.time.com/2002/jenin/story.html; and for a brief legal analysis of the battle see Law in the Fog of War, Time, at http://www.time.com/2002/jenin/viewpoint.html.Google Scholar

⁹¹ For a summary of the indictment against several individuals accused of sending the suicide bomber, Abed Al Basat Uda, to his mission, see, Indictment against terrorist involved in the terror attack at the Park Hotel in Netanya, Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 3 July 2002, at www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Government/Communiques/2002/Indictment%20against%20terrorist%20involved%20in%20the%20terro.Google Scholar

⁹² Draft resolution of 9 April 2002, supra note 25.Google Scholar

⁹³ The final version of Resolution 2002/8 provides: “Recalling particularly General Assembly resolution 37/43 of 3 December 1982 reaffirming the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples against foreign occupation.” For the specific General Assembly reference, see G.A. Res. 37/43, 3 December 1982, at http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/bac85a78081380 fb852560d90050dc5f?OpenDocument (“Reaffirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for independence, territorial integrity, national unity and liberation from colonial and foreign domination and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle.”) (emphasis added).Google Scholar

⁹⁴ K. Ramsay, reporter, “The International Movement Against All forms of Discrimination and Racism (IMADR),” Commission on Human Rights, 58^th Sess., 12 April 2002 (voting on items 6 and 8, debate on Items II on the Questions of Civil and Political Rights).Google Scholar

⁹⁵ Id. at 4.Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Id. (“The resolution focuses on violations over the last year, and some refer to the current situation. It is not a political manipulation.”)Google Scholar

⁹⁷ Letter from the Permanent Observer for Palestine to the United Nations Office at Geneva addressed to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (Nov. 20, 2002), U.N. Economic and Social Council, Commission on Human Rights, 59^th Sess., Provisional Agenda Item 8, Doc. E/CN.4/2003/G/17, 6 December 2002.Google Scholar

⁹⁸ See G.A. Res. ES-7/2 (1980), supra note 85.Google Scholar

⁹⁹ East Timor (Port. v. Austl.), 1995 I.C.J. 90, 102. But see, South West Africa (Eth. and Liber. v. S. Afr.), 1966 I.C.J. 6 (holding applicant states lack right or interest required to bring a claim alleging infringement of U.N. mandate for Namibian territory).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ See I. Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law 513 (4^th ed. 1990); but see J. Crawford, The Creation of States in International Law 81 (1979).Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ Reference re Secession of Qubec, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217 (Supreme Court of Canada).Google Scholar

¹⁰² K. Vonnegut, Jr., Wampeters, Foma & Granfalloons 238 (New York 1974)‥Google Scholar

¹⁰³ J. Somer, Geodesic Vonnegut; or, If Buckminster Fuller Wrote Novels, in The Vonnegut Statement 243 (J. Klinkowitz & J. Somer, eds., Delacore Press 1973).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ Advisory Opinion Rep.12 I.C.J. (1975).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁵ Id. at 122.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁶ Decolonization Committee, Cmnd. 2632 at 14; G.A. Res. 2070, U.N. GAOR 20^th Sess., Supp. No. 14, at 58 (1965) (encouraging a negotiated solution for Gibraltar as between Spain and the United Kingdom); G.A. Res. 2065, U.N. GAOR 20^th Sess” Supp. No. 14, at 57 (inviting Argentina to participate in the Committee's deliberations over the Falklands).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁷ In both the Gibraltar and the Falklands cases, the Decolonization Committee and the General Assembly have focused their analysis on a particular reading of paragraph 6 of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Territories and Peoples, G.A. Res. 1514 (XV), U.N. GAOR 15^th Sess., Supp. No. 16, at 66 (1960) (“Any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and the territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.”).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ Supra note 104, esp. para. 87 (“Western Sahara (Rio de Oro and Sakiet El Hamra) is a territory having very special characteristics…”).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ Vonnegut, supra note 10, at 2‥Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ Id. at 166.Google Scholar

¹¹¹ G.A. Res. 3485, U.N. GAOR 30^th Sess., Supp. No. 34, at 118 (1975) (calling on the people of East Timor to decide their own future); S.C. Res. 384, U.N. SCOR, 20^th year, Resolutions and Decisions, at 10 (1975) (calling on Indonesia to facilitate self-determination in East Timor). See also, Opinion No. 2, Arbitration Commission, European Community on Yugoslavia, 92 I.L.R. 167 (1992) (“…the Republics must afford the members of those minorities and ethnic groups all the human rights and fundamental freedoms recognized in international law, including, where appropriate, the right to choose their nationality.”).Google Scholar

¹¹² Supra note 30.Google Scholar

¹¹³ Id. at 295.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ D. E. Morse, The Novels of Kurt Vonnegut: Imagining Being an American 104 (Westport 2003). (Trout is said to resemble Vonnegut's father, but as an author he is impotent to re-create Vonnegut (i.e. his erstwhile offspring) who, in circular fashion, is actually his creator.).Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ Kurt Vonnegut, Jailbird (New York 1980).Google Scholar

¹¹⁶ On the International Court of Justice's use and non-use of precedent see, Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru Rep. 240 I.C.J. (1992).Google Scholar

¹¹⁷ For a description of the relationship between ‘reality’ and ‘fantasy’ in Vonnegut, see, G. Meeter, Vonnegut's Formal and Moral Otherworldliness: Cat's Cradle and Slaughterhouse-Five, in Klinkowitz and Somer, supra note 103, at 206.Google Scholar

¹¹⁸ Vonnegut, supra note 10, at 206.Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ C. Berryman, Vonnegut's Comic Persona in Breakfast of Champions, in Bloom, supra note 11, at 63 (describing the climactic scene in Breakfast of Champions (1973), the novel immediately following Slaughterhouse-Five).Google Scholar