¹ Network (MGM 1976).Google Scholar

² Id. Google Scholar

³ Ebert, Roger, Review of Network, Chicago Sun-Times, Jan. 1, 1976, available at http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19760101/REVIEWS/601010305/1023.Google Scholar

⁴ Hardenbrook, Andrew, The Equator Principles: the Private Financial Sector's Attempt at Environmental Responsibility (2007) 40 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 197 (2007).Google Scholar

⁵ Rabin, Matthew, A Perspective on Psychology and Economics (UC Berkeley Econ. Working Paper No. E02-313, 2005).Google Scholar

⁶ Amalric, Franck, The Equator Principles: A Step Towards Sustainability? (Center for Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Working Paper Series, No. 01(05), 2005).Google Scholar

⁷ Wright, Christopher, Setting Standards for Responsible Banking: Examining the Role of the International Finance Corporation in the Emergence of the Equator Principles, in International Organizations in Global Environmental Governance (Frank Biermann, Bernd Siebenhüner & Anna Schreyögg eds., 2009), at 51.Google Scholar

⁸ Wotruba, Thomas, Industry Self-Regulation: A Review and Extension to a Global Setting, 16 J. of Pub. Pol'y & Marketing 38 (1997).Google Scholar

⁹ Amalric, , supra note 6.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Shever, Elana, Engendering the Company: Corporate Personhood and the ‘Face’ of an Oil Company in Metropolitan Buenos Aires, 33 Pol. and Legal Anthropology Rev. 26 (2010).Google Scholar

¹¹ Hardenbrook, , supra note 4.Google Scholar

¹² Aizawa, Motoko & Yang, Chaofei, Green Credit, Green Stimulus, Green Revolution? China's Mobilization of Banks for Environmental Cleanup, 19 J. of Env't & Dev. 119 (2010).Google Scholar

¹³ Wright, Christopher & Rwabizambuga, Alexis, Institutional Pressures, Corporate Reputation, and Voluntary Codes of Conduct: An Examination of the Equator Principles, 111 Bus. & Soc'y Rev. 89 (2006).Google Scholar

¹⁴ Eisner, Marc Allen, Corporate Environmentalism, Regulatory Reform, and Industry Self Regulation: Toward Genuine Regulatory Reinvention in the United States, 17 Governance: An Int'l J. of Pol'y, Admin., & Institutions 145 (2004).Google Scholar

¹⁵ O'Sullivan, Niamh & O'Dwyer, Brendan, Stakeholder Perspectives on a Financial Sector Legitimation Process: The Case of NGOs and the Equator Principles, 22 Acct., Auditing & Accountability J. 553 (2009).Google Scholar

¹⁶ BankTrack, Bold Steps Forward: Towards Equator Principles that Deliver to People and the Planet (2011), available at: http://www.banktrack.org/manage/ems_files/download/bold_steps_forward/100114_civil_society_call_equator_principles.pdf.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Conley, John & Williams, Cynthia, Global Banks as Global Sustainability Regulators? The Equator Principles, 33 L. & Pol'y 542 (2011).Google Scholar

¹⁸ Id. Google Scholar

¹⁹ Aizawa, & Yang, , supra note 12.Google Scholar

²⁰ Aizawa, & Yanga, , supra note 12.Google Scholar

²¹ Christian Vannier, Audit Culture and Grassroots Participation in Rural Haitian Development, 33 Pol. & Legal Anthropology Rev. 282 (2010).Google Scholar

²² Conley, & Williams, , supra note 17.Google Scholar

²³ Mullainathan, Sendhil & Thaler, Richard, Behavioral Economics (MIT Dept. of Econ. Working Paper No. 00-27, 2000).Google Scholar

²⁴ Sunstein, Cass, Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment (U. of Chicago Law & Economics Working Paper No. 227, 2004).Google Scholar

²⁵ Id. Google Scholar

²⁶ Sunstein, , supra note 24.Google Scholar

²⁷ Barberis, Nicholas & Thaler, Richard, A survey of behavioral finance, in Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1st ed. vol. 1 (Anthony Constantinides, Rene Stulz & Milton Harris eds., 2003), at 1053.Google Scholar

²⁸ Sunstein, Cass, Hazardous Heuristics (U. of Chicago Law & Economics Working Paper No. 165, 2002), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=344620.Google Scholar

²⁹ Id. Google Scholar

³⁰ Sunstein, , Hazardous Heuristics, supra note 28.Google Scholar

³¹ Id. Google Scholar

³² Id. Google Scholar

³³ Sunstein, Hazardous Heuristics, supra note 28.Google Scholar

³⁴ Id. Google Scholar

³⁵ Kahneman, Daniel & Sunstein, Cass, Indignation: Psychology, Politics, Law (U. of Chicago Law & Economics Working Paper No. 346, 2007).Google Scholar

³⁶ Id.Google Scholar

³⁷ Kahneman, & Sunstein, , supra note 35.Google Scholar

³⁸ Kahneman, & Sunstein, , supra note 35.Google Scholar

³⁹ Barberis, & Thaler, , supra note 27.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Id. Google Scholar

⁴¹ Rabin, , supra note 5.Google Scholar

⁴² Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (Levine's Working Paper Archive 7656, 1979).Google Scholar

⁴³ Barberis, & Thaler, , supra note 27.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Id.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Id. Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Shamir, Ronen, Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards a New Market-Embedded Morality?, 9.2 Theoretical Inquiries in L. 371 (2008).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Id.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Id.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Shamir, , supra note 46.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Id. Google Scholar

⁵¹ Fehr, Ernst & Schmidt, Klaus, A Theory Of Fairness, Competition, And Cooperation, 114(3) The Q. J. of Econ. 817 (1999).Google Scholar

⁵² Id. Google Scholar

⁵³ Rabin, , supra note 5.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Fehr, & Schmidt, , supra note 49.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Id. Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Fehr, & Schmidt, , supra note 49.Google Scholar