Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T10:59:49.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the computation of Hopf 2-cocycles with an example of diagonal type

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2022

Agustín García Iglesias*
Affiliation:
FaMAF-CIEM (CONICET), Medina Allende S/N, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Ciudad Universitaria, Córdoba X5000HUA, Argentina Republic
José Ignacio Sánchez
Affiliation:
FaMAF-CIEM (CONICET), Medina Allende S/N, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Ciudad Universitaria, Córdoba X5000HUA, Argentina Republic
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: agustingarcia@unc.edu.ar

Abstract

We present a framework for the computation of the Hopf 2-cocycles involved in the deformations of Nichols algebras over semisimple Hopf algebras. We write down a recurrence formula and investigate the extent of the connection with invariant Hochschild cohomology in terms of exponentials. As an example, we present detailed computations leading to the explicit description of the Hopf 2-cocycles involved in the deformations of a Nichols algebra of Cartan type $A_2$ with $q=-1$ , a.k.a. the positive part of the small quantum group $\mathfrak{u}^+_{\sqrt{-\text{1}}}(\mathfrak{sl}_3)$ . We show that these cocycles are generically pure, that is they are not cohomologous to exponentials of Hochschild 2-cocycles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andruskiewitsch, N. and García Iglesias, A., Twisting Hopf algebras from cocycle deformations, Ann. Univ. Ferrara Sez. VII Sci. Mat. 63(2) (2017), 221247.Google Scholar
Andruskiewitsch, N. and Schneider, H. J., Pointed Hopf algebras, in New directions in Hopf algebras, Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, vol. 43 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002), 1–68.Google Scholar
Andruskiewitsch, N. and Schneider, H. J., On the classification of finite-dimensional pointed Hopf algebras, Ann. Math. (2) 171(1) (2010), 375417.Google Scholar
Andruskiewitsch, N. and Vay, C., On a family of Hopf algebras of dimension 72, Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 19(3) (2012), 415443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angiono, I., On Nichols algebras of diagonal type, J. Reine Angew. Math. 683 (2013), 189251.Google Scholar
Angiono, I., A presentation by generators and relations of Nichols algebras of diagonal type and convex orders on root systems, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 17(10) (2015), 26432671.Google Scholar
Angiono, I. and García Iglesias, A., Liftings of Nichols algebras of diagonal type II. All liftings are cocycle deformations, Selecta Math. 25(1) (2019), Paper No. 5, 95 pp.Google Scholar
Brown, K. S., Cohomology of groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg GmbH & Co., 1982).Google Scholar
Căldăraru, A., Giaquinto, A. and Witherspoon, S., Algebraic deformations arising from orbifolds with discrete torsion, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 187(1–3) (2004), 5170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doi, Y., Equivalent crossed products for a Hopf algebra, Commun. Algebra 17(12) (1989), 30533085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doi, Y. and Takeuchi, M., Multiplication alteration by two-cocycles - the quantum version, Commun. Algebra 22(14) (1994), 57155732.Google Scholar
Fantino, F., García, G. and Mastnak, M., On finite-dimensional copointed Hopf algebras over dihedral groups, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 223(8) (2019), 36113634.Google Scholar
García, G. A. and Mastnak, M., Deformation by cocycles of pointed Hopf algebras over non-abelian groups, Math. Res. Lett. 22 (2015), 5992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Iglesias, A. and Mombelli, M., Representations of the category of modules over pointed Hopf algebras over $\mathbb{S}_3$ and $\mathbb{S}_4$ , Pac. J. Math. 252(2) (2011), 343378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Iglesias, A. and Sánchez, J., Hopf cocycles associated to pointed and copointed deformations over $\mathbb{S}_3$ , in progress.Google Scholar
García Iglesias, A. and Vay, C., Finite-dimensional Pointed or Copointed Hopf algebras over affine racks, J. Algebra 397 (2014), 379406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Iglesias, A. and Vay, C., Copointed Hopf algebras over $\mathbb{S}_4$ , J. Pure Appl. Algebra 222(9) (2018), 27842809.Google Scholar
Grunelfelder, L. and Mastnak, M., Pointed and copointed Hopf algebras as cocycle deformations, arXiv:0709.0120 (2007).Google Scholar
Heckenberger, I., Classification of arithmetic root systems, Adv. Math. 220(1) (2009), 59124.Google Scholar
Mastnak, M. and Witherspoon, S., Bialgebra cohomology, pointed Hopf algebras, and deformations, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 213(7) (2009), 13991417 Google Scholar
Masuoka, A., Abelian and non-abelian second cohomologies of quantized enveloping algebras, J. Algebra 320(1) (2008), 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, S., Hopf algebras and their action on rings, CBMS Regional Conference Series, vol. 82 (1993).Google Scholar
Sánchez, J., Álgebras de Hopf y deformaciones por cociclo. Tesis de Licenciatura (Universidad Nacional de Formosa, Argentina, 2020).Google Scholar
Schauenburg, P., Hopf-Galois and bi-Galois extensions, in Galois theory, Hopf algebras, and semiabelian categories. Fields Institute Communications, vol. 43 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004), 469515.Google Scholar
Ştefan, D., Hochschild cohomology on Hopf Galois extensions, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 103(2) (1995), 221233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar