Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T06:28:21.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rings all of whose torsion quasi-injective modules are injective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

J. Ahsan  and
E. Enochs
J. Ahsan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University Of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, U.S.A.
E. Enochs
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University Of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Throughout this paper it is assumed that rings are associative, have the identity element, and all modules are left unital. R will denote a ring with identity, R-Mod the category of left R-modules, and for each left R-module M, E(M) (resp. J(M)) will represent the injective hull (resp. Jacobson radical) of M. Also, for a module M, A ⊆' M will mean that A is an essential submodule of M, and Z(M) denotes the singular submodule of M. M is called singular if Z(M) = M, and it is called non-singular in case Z(M) = 0. For fundamental definitions and results related to torsion theories, we refer to [12] and [14]. In this paper we shall deal mainly with Goldie torsion theory. Recall that a pair (G, F) of classes of left R-modules is known as Goldie torsion theory if G is the smallest torsion class containing all modules B/A, where A ⊆' B, and the torsion free class F is precisely the class of non-singular modules.

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , July 1984 , pp. 219 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1984

References

REFERENCES

1.Boyle, A. K., Hereditary Ql-rings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 192 (1974), 115–120.Google Scholar
2.Boyle, A. K. and Goodearl, K. R., Rings over which certain modules are injective, Pacific J. Math. 58 (1975), 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Byrd, K. A., When are quasi-injectives injective?, Canad. Math. Bull. 15 (1972), 599–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Byrd, K. A., Rings whose quasi-injective modules are injective, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 33 (1972), 235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Cateforis, V. C. and Sandomierski, F. L., The singular submodule splits off, J. Algebra 10 (1968), 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Cozzens, J. and Faith, C., Simple noetherian rings (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Faith, C., Modules finite over endomorphism rings, Lectures on rings and modules, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 246 (Springer, 1972), 146–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Faith, C., On hereditary rings and Boyle's conjecture, Arch. Math. 27 (1976), 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Fuller, K. R., On direct representations of quasi-injectives and quasi-projectives, Arch. Math. 20 (1969), 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Golan, J. and Papp, Z., Cocritically nice rings and Boyle's conjecture, Comm. Algebra 8 (1980), 1775–1798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Golan, J. and Teply, M., Finiteness conditions on filters of left ideals, J. Pure and Applied Algebra 3 (1973), 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Lambek, J., Torsion theories, additive semantics and rings of quotients, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 177 (Springer, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Michler, G. O. and Villamayor, O. E., On rings whose simple modules are injective, J. Algebra 25 (1973), 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Stenström, B., Rings and modules of quotients, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 237 (Springer, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar