Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2014
Social Democratic Parties Across Europe Face adjustment problems. Given the electoral decline of almost every social democratic party, it is tempting for social scientists to pronounce such political parties as either in decay or even a thing of the past. There is little doubt that social democratic parties are searching for new concepts, ideas and policies. At the heart of the attempt to regain the political initiative is the debate over how to react not only to the challenges from the new social movements but also to the re-invigorated attack by liberals and conservatives on central social democratic policies: the welfare state and socioeconomicequality.
Drafts of this article were presented at the 21st Annual Joint Sessions of the ECPR in Leiden, April 1993, and at the 89th Annual Meeting of the APSA in Washington DC, September 1993. The authors would particularly like to thank David Miller and Tim Tilton for their comments.
2 See Przeworski, Adam and Sprague, John, Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism, Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1986 Google Scholar. Also Fox Piven, Frances, (ed.). Labor Partus in Postindustrial Societies, New York, Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
3 Offe, Claus, Contradictions of the Welfare State, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1984 Google Scholar. See also Offe, Claus, ‘Smooth Consolidation in the West German Welfare State’, in Piven, F. F., (ed.), op. cit., 1991.Google Scholar
4 See Marks, Gary and Lemke, Christiane, (eds). The Crisis of Socialism in Europe, Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
5 See Koelble, Thomas, ‘Recasting Social Democracy in Europe’, Politics and Society, Vol. 20, No. 1, 03 1992.Google Scholar
6 Gould, Carol, Rethinking Democracy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988 Google Scholar provides a good introduction to die issues of social and economic democracy.
7 Rothstein, Bo, ‘Social Justice and State Capacity’, Politics and Society, Vol. 20, No. 1, 03 1992, pp. 102–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Naphtali, Fritz, Wirtschaftsdemokratis: Ihr Wesen, Wtg and Zitl, Berlin0, Allgemeine Deutsche Gewerkschaftsbund, 1928.Google Scholar
9 Gleitze, Bruno, (ed.), Sozialkaital und Sezialfonds alt Mittel Vermogenspolitik, Cologne, WSI Veriag, 1969.Google Scholar
10 See also Esping-Andersen, Gosta, Politics Against Markets: Tat Social Democratic Road le Power, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1985 Google Scholar and the contributions by Pontusson, Jonas, ‘Behind and Beyond Social Democracy in Sweden’, New Left Review, 143, 01-02 1984 Google Scholar and ‘Radicalization and Retreat in Swedish Social Democracy’, New Left Review, 165, 1987.
11 Swenson, Peter, Fair Slums: Unions, Pay, and Polities in Sweden and West Germany, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1989, pp. 111–128.Google Scholar
12 Swenson, ibid., 1989, p. 121.
13 Swenson, ibid., 1989, p. 113.
14 Swenson, Peter, ‘Labor and the Limits of the Welfare State’, Comparative Politics, Vol. 23, No. 4, 07 1991, p. 384.Google Scholar
15 Martin, Andrew, ‘Wages, Profits, and Investments in Sweden’, Lindberg, Leon and Maier, Charles, (eds.), The Politics of Inflation and Economic Stagnation, Washington DC, Brookings, 1985.Google Scholar
16 Swenson, op. cit., 1991, p. 394.
17 Esping-Andersen, op. cit., 1985, p. 297.
18 Esping-Andersen, op. cit., 1985, p. 294.
19 Swenson, op. cit., 1991, p. 390.
20 Swenson, ibid., 1991, p. 390.
21 Swenson, op. cit., 1989, pp. 185–205.
22 Swenson, op. cit., 1991, p. 391.
23 Swenson, op. cit., 1989, p. 7.
24 Pontusson, Jonas, ‘The Comparative Success of Labor-initiated Reform’, in Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 25, No. 4, 01 1993, p. 556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Pontusson, op. cit., 1987, pp. 28–30.
26 Rothstein, op. cit., 1992, p. 118.
27 Pontusson, op. cit., 1993, pp. 557–559.
28 Swenson, op. cit., 1991, p. 383.
29 Swenson, op. cit., 1989, p. 196.
30 Swenson, op. cit., 1989, p. 164.
31 Esping-Andersen, op. cit., 1985, p. 311.
32 Rothstein, op. cit., 1992, pp. 120–3.
33 This is Van Parijs’s narrow definition: see Parijs, Philippe van, ‘Competing Justifications of Basic Income’, in Van Parijs, P. (ed.), Arguing for Basic Income, London, Verso, 1992, pp. 3–4 Google Scholar. See for a broad definition which includes partial basic income, household basic income, negative income tax and social service-based basic income, Roebroek, Joop M., The Imprisoned Slate, Tilburg, University Press, 1993, pp. 278–81.Google Scholar
34 See on the history of the idea of basic income Boulanger, Paul-Marie et al. (ed.), Ľ Allocauon Universelle, La Revue Nouvelle, 41, 1985, No. 4 Google Scholar; Walter, Tony, Basic Income, London, Marion Boyars, 1989, pp. 23–33 Google Scholar; Trier, Walter van, ‘Who Framed Social Dividend?’, Rapport 89/230, University of Antwerp, 1989 Google Scholar; Roebroek, Joop M. and Hogenboom, Erik, Basisinkonun, The Hague, Vuga, 1990, chs. 1, 4.Google Scholar
35 Roebroek and Hogenboom, op. cit., 1990, p. 82.
36 See Roebroek, op. cit., 1993, pp. 92–3.
37 Roebroek, ibid., 1993, pp. 107–9.
38 This is the most extensive basic income scheme to date, together with Parker, Hermione, Instead of the Dolt, London, Routledge, 1989 Google Scholar, who discusses a British model.
39 Den Uyl, Joop M., Dt tockomst onder ogen (Facing the Future), Amsterdam, Bert Bakker, 1986, pp. 131–2.Google Scholar Gorz refers here to the ‘South-Africanization effect’ of basic income: Andre Gorz, ‘On the Difference between Society and Community, and Why Basic Income Cannot by Itself Confer Full Membership of Either’, in Van Parijs (ed.), op. cit., 1992, p. 182.
40 Pronk, Jan et al., Schuidende panelen (Shifting Panels), Amsterdam, PvdA Press, 1987.Google Scholar
41 Central Planning Bureau, Scanning the Future, The Hague, SDU (State Press), 1992.
42 Arbeid, Partij van de, Wat mensen bindt (Things that bind People), Election Programme 1994–1998, Amsterdam, PvdA Press, 1993 Google Scholar, Section 4.4.
43 Roebroek, op. cit., 1993, pp. 285–9.
44 See Elster, Jon, Solomonic Judgements, Cambridge, University Press, 1989, pp. 215–16Google Scholar. See also Van Parijs (ed.), op. cit., 1992 and Roche, Maurice, Rethinking Citizenship, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1992 Google Scholar, part III and Veen, Robert Van der, Between Exploitation and Communism, Groningen, Wolters-Noordhoff, 1991, pp. 197–207.Google Scholar
45 Brand, Kari-Werner, Buesser, Detlef and Rucht, Dieter, Aufbruch in cins Gestellchaft, Frankfurt, Campus Veriag, 1986 Google Scholar; on the relationship between social democrats and environmentalism see Siegmann, Heinrich, The Conflicts between Labour and Environmentalism in the FRG and US, London, St. Martin’s Press, 1985.Google Scholar
46 Rubart, Frauke, ‘Neue Soziale Bewegungen und alte Parteien in Schweden’, in Brand, Karl-Werner, (ed.), Neue Soziale Bewegungen in Westeuropa und den USA, Frankfurt, Campus Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar
47 Padgett, Stephen, ‘The West German Social Democrats in Opposition 1982–1986’, West European Politics, Vol. 10, No. 3, 07 1987, pp. 339–40.Google Scholar
48 Party, Labour, Meet the Challenge – Make the Change, London, Labour Party, 1989, p. 76.Google Scholar
49 Hall, Peter, ‘Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State’, Comparative Politics, Vol. 25, No. 3, 04 1993 p. 288.Google Scholar
50 Weir, Margaret, ‘Ideas and bounded Innovation’, in Thelen, K., Steinmo, S. and Longstreth, F., (eds), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
51 Weir, ibid., p. 189.
52 See Krieger, Joel, ‘Class, Consumption and Collectivism: Perspectives on the British Labour Party and Electoral Competition in Britain’, in Piven, Francis Fox, (ed.), op. cit., pp. 47–70.Google Scholar
53 Max Weber quoted in Brubaker, Rogers, Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1992, p. 17.Google Scholar
54 See Anderson, Perry, A Zone of Engagement, London, Verso, 1992, p. 372–5.Google Scholar
