Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T07:36:43.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gramsci and the Italian Communist Party

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Stephen White
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

WITH THE RECENT PUBLICATION OF A SUBSTANTIAL PART OF THE ‘Prison Notebooks’, Gramsci studies may safely be said to have ‘come in from the cold’. While Isaac Deutscher goes too far in his claim for ‘the oblivion to which Gramsci's memory was consigned during the Stalin era’, considerable parts of his political career remained obscure, and evidence of his disagreement with many of the orthodoxies of his time, and with PCI decisions associated with them, has only recently been forthcoming. Publication of his writings has had in general to wait for the ideological relaxation which followed the 20th Congress of the CPSU in 1956. Publication of his work in the Soviet Union itself was initiated in 1957, and a three-volume selection eventually appeared. In Yugoslavia, a Selected Works appeared in 1959. Yet it was evident that even in an era of declared de-Stalinization, Gramsci's writings could remain something of an embarrassment to communist orthodoxy.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , 01 April 1972 , pp. 186 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The present paper was first presented at a seminar in the University of Glasgow. I wish to express my gratitude to those who commented upon it at that time, and also to Dr Martin Clark, of Edinburgh University, and Dr Domenico Corradini, of the University of Pisa, for their comments and advice.

2 Deutscher, Isaac, The Prophet Outcast, London, 1963, p. 31.Google Scholar

3 Gramshi, A., Izbrannyye Proizvedeniya, 3 vols., Moscow, 1957–58.Google Scholar

4 Gramsci, A., Selected Works, Belgrade, 1959 Google Scholar. Note also his Pisma Wybrane, 2 vols., Warsaw, 1961; and Die Suditalienische Fruge, Berlin, 1955.

5 S. Mallet in France Observateur 30 November 1961, quoted in Greene, T., ‘Communist Parties of Italy and France’, World Politics, xxi, No. 1, 10 1968, p. 27.Google Scholar

6 Gramsci, A, Oeuvres Choisies, Editions Sociales, Paris, 1959 Google Scholar. His Lettres de la Prison, Paris 1953, had already appeared in an incomplete from.

7 Vincent, J. M. in Revue Française de Science Politique, xxi, No. 1, 03 1962, p. 188.Google Scholar

8 Gramsci, A., The Modern Prince, London, 1957.Google Scholar

9 Gramsci, A., Selections from the Prison Notebooks, edited and translated, and with an important introduction, by Hoare, Quintin and Nowell, Geoffrey Smith, London, 1971.Google Scholar

10 Cammett, J. M., Antonio Gramsci and the Origins of Italian Communism, Stanford, 1967, p. 190.Google Scholar

11 Ibid.

12 Statuto del PCI, 1966 ed., p. 3.

13 Full details of the election results are printed in Italy: Documents and notes (official publication), xvii, No. 3, Rome, May‐June 1968, pp. 199–200.

14 Luigi Longo in Unita, 11 September 1964.

15 Reprinted in Togliatti, P., Sul Movimento Operaio Internazionale, Rome, 1964, PP. 231–5.Google Scholar

16 Reprinted in P. Togliatti, op. cit., pp. 361–76. Both this and the interview previously cited were interestingly reproduced in the party's collection of speeches and documents on the Czech crisis: Longo, L., Sui Fatti di Cecoslovacchia, Rome, 1968.Google Scholar

17 For an up‐to‐date statement of party policy, see Progetto di Tesi per il XII Congresso del PCI, Rome, 1968. The question of ‘structural reform’ is treated in Halliday, J., ‘Italy and “Structural Reforms”’, New Left Review, 50, 07-08 1968;Google Scholar the party debate is reflected in Terracini, U. (ed.) La Riforma dello Stato, Rome, 1968.Google Scholar

18 Reprinted in Togliatti, P., La Via Italiana al Socialismo, Rome, 1964, pp. 263–8.Google Scholar

19 Togliatti, P., Gramsci, Florence, 1955, p. 73.Google Scholar

20 E. d'Onofrio in Rinascita, November, 1953, quoted in Galli, G.: ‘Italian Communism’ in Grfith, W. E. (ed.), Communism in Europe, Vol. I, London 1964, P. 309.Google Scholar

21 See Problems of Communism, xiv, No. 5, September‐October 1965, pp. 2–3.

22 See in particular 1926, ‘Sulla rottura nel gruppo dirigente del partito Bolscevico’, Rinascita 30 May 1964: A. Lisa, ‘Discussione politica con Gramsci in carcere’, Rinascita 12 December 1964; G. Lay, ‘Colloqui con Gramsci in carcere’, Rinascita 20 February 1965; G. Trombetti, “Piantone” di Gramsci nel carcere di Turi’, Rinascita 1 May 1965; G. Fiori, Vita di Antonio Gramsci, Bari, 1966, p. 292.

23 G. Amendola in Rinascita, 10 March 1967, p. 21.

24 Publication in the Annali of the Feltrinelli Institute, 1960, of a collection of documents from the Tasca archive dealing in part with the party leadership in the early 1920s appears to have prompted the party's publication of its own Formazione del gruppo dirigente del PCI, Rome, 1962, with the inclusion of a number of documents reportedly ‘recently rediscovered’ in the party's archive. It may not be too much to hope for further such ‘discoveries’.

25 Greene, T. H., ‘The Communist Parties of Italy and France’, World Politics, xxi, No. 1, 10 1968, p. 27.Google Scholar

26 Williams, G. A., ‘Gramsci's Concept of “Egemonia”’, Journal of the History of Ideas”, xxi, No. 4, 10‐12 1960, p. 587.Google Scholar

27 Togliatti, P., Gramsci, Rome, 1967, p. 154.Google Scholar

28 Gramsci Oggi, Rome, 1967, p. 42.

29 Togliatti, P., La Via Italiana al Socialismo, Rome, 1964, p. 176.Google Scholar

30 ‘Workers of all Countries, Unite and Oppose our Common Enemy’, Peking, 1963, pp. 59–60.

31 Mancini, and Mancini, , ‘Gramsci's Presence’, Government and Opposition, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1968, p. 334.Google Scholar

32 Gramsci, A., l'Ordine Nuovo, Turin, 1955, p. 123.Google Scholar

33 Ibid., p. 103.

34 Gramsci, A., Note sul Machiavelli, Turin, 1966, p. 51.Google Scholar

35 Quoted in Fiori, op. cit., pp. 292–3.

36 See the expression of his views in the Lyons Theses, quoted in Fiori, op. cit., p. 236.

37 Gramsci, A., Note sul Machiavelli, Turin, 1966, p. 23.Google Scholar

38 Gramsci, A., l'Ordine Nuovo, Turin, 1955, pp. 68, 11, 37.Google Scholar

39 Togliatti, P., Il Partito, Rome, 1964, p. 113.Google Scholar

40 Togliatti, P., Gramsci, Rome, 1967, p. 161.Google Scholar

41 Ibid., p. 22.

42 Ibid., p. 27.

43 Gramsci, A., l'Ordine Nuovo, Turin, 1955, p. 70.Google Scholar

44 Ibid., p. 71.

45 Gramsci, A., l'Ordine Nouvo, Turin, 1955, p. 59.Google Scholar

46 Togliatti, P., Gramsci, Rome, 1967, p. 30.Google Scholar

47 Ibid., pp. 19, 20, 21.

48 Ibid., p. 69.

49 Ibid., p. 139.

50 Ferrata, and Gallo, , 2000 Pagine di Gramsci, Milan, 1964, p. 481.Google Scholar

51 Togliatti, P., Gramsci, Rome, 1967, p. 46.Google Scholar

52 Togliatti, P., La Via Italiana al Socialismo, Rome, 1964, p. 158.Google Scholar For this process as a whole see the provocative Il revisionismo del PCI: origini e sviluppo, Milan, 1971.

53 Ibid., p. 108.

54 Ibid., p. 158.

55 Djilas, M., Conversations with Stalin, Harmondsworth, 1963, pp. 60, 141.Google Scholar

56 Quoted by Galli, G. in Problems of Communism, V, No. 3, 05-06 1956, p. 45.Google Scholar

57 Kogan, N., Politics of Italian Foreign Policy, London, 1963, p. 59.Google Scholar

58 Galli, art. cit., p. 44.

59 Ibid., p. 44.

60 G. Amendola in Rinascita, 28 November 1964.

61 Quoted in Tarrow, S. G., ‘Political Dualism and Italian Communism’, American Political Science Review, lx, No. 1, 03 1967, p. 41.Google Scholar

62 Togliatti, P., La Via Italiana al Socialismo, Rome, 1964, p. 197.Google Scholar

63 Tarrow, S. G., Peasant Communism in Southern Italy, New Haven, 1967, p. 140.Google Scholar

64 Tarrow, op. cit., p. 41.

65 Statuto del Partito Comunista Italiano, Rome, 1966 ed., p. 6.

66 Togliatti, P., La Via Italiana al Socialismo, Rome, 1964, p. 41.Google Scholar

67 Progetto di Tesi per il XII Congresso del PCI, Rome, 1968, p. 9. The party, it has been noted, although ‘ideologically opposed to parliamentary government, has, from its imposed place of permanent opposition, become its staunchest defender’. P. Allum, ‘Italy: the Politics of Namier’, New Society, 2 April 1970, p. 559.

68 Gramsci, A., l'Ordine Nuovo, Turin, 1955, p. 59.Google Scholar

69 Tarrow, op. cit., p. 157. A parliamentary strategy undeniably represents in itself a reformist pressure of importance, in obliging communist candidates to compete for the votes, and if elected to represent the interests of all members of a given geographic area, or constituency, without reference to their social origins.

70 See especially G. Galli in Griffith (ed.), op. cit., p. 316.

71 Dogan, M., ‘Political Cleavage and Social Stratification in France and Italy’, in Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments, London, 1967, p. 141.Google Scholar

72 Ibid., p. 133.

73 Ibid., p. 135.

74 Ibid., p. 148.

75 Tarrow, op. cit., p. 42.

76 Gramsd, A., l'Ordine Nuovo, Turin, 1955, p. 16.Google Scholar

77 Up‐to‐date statistics on this question are presented in Lucio Libertini, Iniegrazione Capitalistica e Sottosviluppo, Bari, 1968, especially pp. 9–35.

78 Macaluso, E., I Comunisti e la Sicilia, Rome, 1970, pp. 235, 243 Google Scholar for Sicily; Galli, G., (ed.), Il Comportamento Elettorale in Italia, Bologna, 1968, p. 77.Google Scholar

79 Togliatti, , Gramsci, Rome, 1967, p. 50.Google Scholar