Last updated 09/07/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2014
I DECIDED TO ENTITLE THIS ESSAY ‘TERRA INCOGNITA Australis’ — a rubric appropriate for more than one reason, as will become apparent later — since, the more I think about it, the more convinced I am that what we profess to know concerning the determinants of public policy outcomes has much the same epistemological status as the shapes that appeared in the Southern Hemisphere of sixteenth-century cartographers. The objective of the essay is to substantiate this charge in respect of the prevailing explanatory parad’ ms which inform as to the best way to proceed to give some more definition to the map in future. The charge is a serious one insofar as comparative public policy analysis is currently a boom area in political science. I could be accused of attempting to create a ghost town before the shafts are driven deep enough to hit ‘pay dirt’, but I can only claim that this is not my intention. I have been working in the area which is currently described as comparative public policy for more than a decade now and the explanatory paradigms I criticize are ones to which I have variously subscribed over the years. Since I believe that there is valuable ore to be found, and found in roughly the area in which we are looking for it, I would argue that criticism and redefinition of paradigms are useful tasks, since they improve our eventual chances of hitting a lode-bearing seam.
1 This research was in part funded by the Nuffield Foundation and I wish to acknowledge this invaluable support.
2 Castles, F. G., The Social Democratic Image of Society, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978 Google Scholar.
3 For a summary of the major hypotheses in the field, see Castles, F. G. (ed.), The Impact of Parties, London, Sage Publications, 1982, ch. 2Google Scholar.
4 Lipset, S. M., Political Man, London, Heinemann, 1960, p. 61Google Scholar.
5 See Kerr, et aL, Industrialism and Industrial Man, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1973 Google Scholar.
6 See Altvater, E., ‘Notes on Some Problems of State Interventionism’. Kapitaktate, 2, 3, 1972 Google Scholar; Offe, C., ‘Advanced Capitalism and the Welfare State’, Politics and Society, 2, 1972 Google Scholar; and O’Connor, J., The Fiscal Crisis of the State, New York, St Martin’s Press, 1973 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Marcuse, H., One Dimensional Man, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964.Google Scholar.
8 J. O’Connor, op cit., p. 6.
9 On the social democratic model see Shalev, M., ‘The Social Democratic Model and Beyond: Two Generations of Research on the Welfate State’, The Hebrew University Bertehann Programme, Paper No 8, p. 11, no dateGoogle Scholar.
10 Schmidt, M., ‘The Role of Parties in Shaping Macroeconomic Policy’, in Castles, F. G. (ed.), op cit., 1982, p. 104 Google Scholar.
11 Gough, I., The Political Economy of the Welfare State, London, Macmillan, 1979 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
12 Schmidt, M., op cit., pp. 104–5Google Scholar
13 Castles, F. G., (ed.), op cit., pp. 9–11 Google Scholar.
14 See, for example, Tufte, E., Political Control of the Economy, Princeton University Press; 1978 Google Scholar; Stephens, J., The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism, London, Macrnillan, 1979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Castles, F. G. (ed.), op cit.; Flora, P. and Heidenheimer, A. J. (eds), The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, New Brunswick and London, Transaction Books, 1981 Google Scholar.
15 See Borg, S. and Castles, F. G., ‘The Influence of the Political Right on Public Income Maintenance Expenditure and Equality’, Political Studies, 1981 Google Scholar.
16 Castles, F. G. and McKinlay, R., ‘The Importance of Politics: An Analysis of Public Welfare Commitment in Advanced Democratic States’, European Journal of Political Research, 1979 Google Scholar.
17 Alber, J., ‘Some Causes of Social Security Expenditure Development in Western Europe 1949–1977’ in Loney, Martin et al., Social Policy & Social Welfare, Milton Keynes, Open University Press, 1983 Google Scholar.
18 Castles, F. G., (ed.), op cit., p. 42 Google Scholar.
19 See Roberts, G., ‘The explanation of politics: comparison, strategy and theory’, in Lewis, Paul et al, The Practice of Comparative Politics, London, Longman, 1978, p. 294 Google Scholar.
20 F. G. Castles, (ed.), op cit.
21 Much the best work in establishing the existence of conjunctural patterns in respect of both welfare and various aspects of macroeconomic policy has been undertaken by Manfred Schmidt of the Free University of Berlin. See, for instance, Schmidt, M., ‘The Welfare State and the Economy in Periods of Economic Crisis’, European Journal of Political Research, Volume 11 number 1, 1983, pp. 1—26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 Clark, M., A History of Australia, Vol. V, Melbourne, Melbourne University Press, 1981 Google Scholar.
23 Marshall, T. H., Sociology at the Crossroads and Other Essays, London, Heinemann, 1973 Google Scholar.
