Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:50:25.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Veto Points Revisited: The Role of Party System Institutionalization in Welfare State Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2021

Tamara Popic Open the ORCID record for Tamara Popic [Opens in a new window]
Tamara Popic*
Affiliation:
School of Politics and International Relations, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: t.popic@qmul.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that the impact of veto points on a government's policy outcomes depends crucially on the degree of institutionalization of the party system. Specifically, the article claims that two dimensions of party system institutionalization – stability of relations between parties and between parties and voters – condition the ability of the opposition to block governments' policy plans through veto points. It showcases this argument by applying the method of causal process tracing to a comparative analysis of health policy reforms in Slovakia (2002–2004) and Hungary (2006–2008).

Keywords

veto pointsparty system institutionalizationpolicy changeprocess tracing
Type
Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , April 2023 , pp. 338 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Government and Opposition Limited

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abou-Chadi, T and Immergut, EM (2019) Recalibrating Social Protection: Electoral Competition and the New Partisan Politics of the Welfare State. European Journal of Political Research 58(2), 697–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, D and Pedersen, RB (2013) Process-tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bräuninger, T and Debus, M (2009) Legislative Agenda-Setting in Parliamentary Democracies. European Journal of Political Research 48(6), 804–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00850.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casal Bértoa, F (2011) Sources of Party System Institutionalization in New Democracies: Lessons from East Central Europe. EUI Working Paper. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/15804.Google Scholar
Casal Bértoa, F (2015) Party System Institutionalization: A Travelling Concept? In Müller-Rommel, F and Casal Bértoa, F (eds), Party Politics and Democracy in Europe: Essays in Honour of Peter Mair. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 117–130.Google Scholar
Casal Bértoa, F and Mair, P (2012) Party System Institutionalisation across Time in Post-Communist Europe. In Keman, H and Müller-Rommel, F (eds), Party Government in New Europe. New York: Routledge, pp. 85–113.Google Scholar
Castles, FG (1982) The Impact of Parties: Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Chiaramonte, A and Emanuele, V (2017) Party System Volatility, Regeneration and De-Institutionalization in Western Europe (1945–2015). Party Politics 23(4), 376–388. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1354068815601330.Google Scholar
De Giorgi, E and Ilonszki, G (2018) Opposition Parties in European Legislatures: Conflict or Consensus? Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Emanuele, V, Chiaramonte, A and Soare, S (2020) Does the Iron Curtain Still Exist? The Convergence in Electoral Volatility between Eastern and Western Europe. Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics 55(2), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enyedi, Z and Casal Bértoa, F (2015) Brothers in Arms? Party-blocs and Party System Closure. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, Warsaw, 30 March–2 April 2015.Google Scholar
Fisher, S, Gould, J and Haughton, T (2007) Slovakia's Neoliberal Turn. Europe-Asia Studies 59(6), 977–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130701489170.Google Scholar
Földes, E (2021) Hungary. In Immergut, EM, Anderson, KM, Devitt, C and Popic, T (eds), Health Politics in Europe: A Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 723–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaál, P, Szigeti, S, Csere, M, Gaskins, M and Panteli, D (2011) Health Care Systems in Transition: Hungary. Brussels: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.Google ScholarPubMed
Gašparovič, I (2004) Slovak Presidential Office Document 4212-2004-BA. 18 October. www.nrsr.sk/dl/Browser/DsDocument?documentId=189194.Google Scholar
Hallerberg, M (2011) Empirical Applications of Veto Player Analysis and Institutional Effectiveness. In König, T, Tsebelis, G and Debus, M (eds), Reform Processes and Policy Change: Veto Players and Decision Making in Modern Democracies. New York: Springer, pp. 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haughton, T and Rybář, M (2008) A Change of Direction: The 2006 Parliamentary Elections and Party Politics in Slovakia. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 24(2), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523270802003053.Google Scholar
Häusermann, S, Picot, G and Geering, D (2013) Rethinking Party Politics and the Welfare State – Recent Advances in the Literature. British Journal of Political Science 43(1), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123412000336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, K (2002) Europe and the Slovak Parliamentary Election of June 2006. EPERN Election Briefing 26. www.sussex.ac.uk/sei/documents/epern.pdf.Google Scholar
Huber, E and Stephens, JD (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungarian Constitution (1989) The Constitution of the Republic of Hungary. www.servat.unibe.ch/icl/hu20t___.html.Google Scholar
Hungarian Constitutional Court (2007) Decision 179/I/2007 on 6 April 2007. https://alkotmanybirosag.hu.Google Scholar
Hungarian Ministry of Health (2006) A Magyar Egészségügy Zöld Könyve [The Green Book of Hungarian Health Care]. https://web.archive.org/web/20090704002311/http://www.terapia2008.hu/public/downloads/zold_konyv.pdf.Google Scholar
Immergut, EM (1990) Institutions, Veto Points, and Policy Results: A Comparative Analysis of Health Care. Journal of Public Policy 10(4), 391–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x00006061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immergut, EM, Anderson, KM and Schulze, I (2007) The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Index (2006) Egy átment, egy megbukott [One Passed, One Failed], 20 November. https://index.hu/belfold/ovbszav6798.Google Scholar
Index (2007) Hétfőn jobb lesz inkább autóra, buszra váltani [On Monday, It Will Be Better to Switch to Cars and Buses], 14 December. https://index.hu/gazdasag/magyar/sztr071214.Google Scholar
Index (2008a) Február 1-jétől jöhet az újabb vasutassztrájk [From 1 February, Another Railway Strike Might Come], 18 January. https://index.hu/gazdasag/magyar/vdsz080118.Google Scholar
Index (2008b) Belehalt a koalíció az egészségügybe [The Coalition Died in Healthcare]. 26 April. https://index.hu/belfold/elo614.Google Scholar
Jahn, D (2011) The Veto Player Approach in Macro-Comparative Politics: Concepts and Measurement. In König, T, Debus, M and Tsebelis, G (eds), Reform Processes and Policy Change. Studies in Public Choice, Vol. 16. New York: Springer, pp. 43–68.Google Scholar
Jahn, D and Müller-Rommel, F (2010) Political Institutions and Policy Performance: A Comparative Analysis of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Public Policy 30(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x09990250.Google Scholar
Jahn, D, Düpont, N, Kosanke, S and Baltz, E, together with Behm T, Oberst C, Rachuj M, Stremming C and Thie D (2020) PIP – Parties, Institutions & Preferences: PIP Collection. Version 2020-08.Google Scholar
Jakobsson, N and Kumlin, S (2017) Election Campaign Agendas, Government Partisanship, and Welfare State Generosity. European Political Science Review 9(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/s175577391500034x.Google Scholar
Keeler, JTS (1993) Opening the Window for Reform: Mandates, Crises, and Extraordinary Policy-Making. Comparative Political Studies 25(4), 433–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414093025004002.Google Scholar
Maeda, K (2010) Divided We Fall: Opposition Fragmentation and the Electoral Fortunes of Governing Parties. British Journal of Political Science 40, 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000712340999041x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, S and Torcal, M (2006) Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory after the Third Wave of Democratization. In Katz, RS and Crotty, W (eds), Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, pp. 204–227.Google Scholar
NRSR (2020) History of the National Council of the Slovak Republic. www.nrsr.sk/web/Default.aspx?sid=nrsr/historia.Google Scholar
NRSR Debate (2004a) Debate of 19 May. www.nrsr.sk/dl/Browser/Document?documentId=181128.Google Scholar
NRSR Debate (2004b) Debate of 20 May. www.nrsr.sk/dl/Browser/Document?documentId=181129.Google Scholar
NRSR [National Council of the Slovak Republic] (2004) Bills. www.nrsr.sk/dl/Browser/Default?legId=13&termNr=3.Google Scholar
NRSR Voting Record (2004a) Voting Record of 21 September. www.nrsr.sk/dl/Browser/Document?documentId=223050.Google Scholar
NRSR Voting Record (2004b) Voting Record of 22 September. www.nrsr.sk/dl/Browser/Document?documentId=223051.Google Scholar
NRSR Voting Record (2004c) Voting Record of 21 October. www.nrsr.sk/dl/Browser/Document?documentId=223058.Google Scholar
NVI (2010) 2010 Parliamentary Elections – Results – Composition of the Parliament. https://static.valasztas.hu/dyn/pv10/outroot/vdin2/hu/eredind.htm.Google Scholar
NVI [Hungarian National Election Office] (2008) 2008 National Referendum Results. https://valtor.valasztas.hu/valtort/jsp/orszjkv.jsp?EA=27&W=9.Google Scholar
Országgyűlés Debate (2006b) Debate of 27 November 2006. www.parlament.hu/web/guest/orszaggyulesi-naplo-elozo-ciklusbeli-adatai.Google Scholar
Országgyűlés Debate (2006c) Debate of 04 December 2006. www.parlament.hu/web/guest/orszaggyulesi-naplo-elozo-ciklusbeli-adatai.Google Scholar
Országgyűlés [Hungarian National Assembly] Debate (2006a) Debate of 31 October. www.parlament.hu/web/guest/orszaggyulesi-naplo-elozo-ciklusbeli-adatai.Google Scholar
Országgyűlés Voting Record (2006a) Voting Record T/1093 Amendment on Certain Laws Amending Healthcare in Connection with Health Reform. www.parlament.hu/web/guest/iromanyok-elozo-ciklusbeli-adatai.Google Scholar
Országgyűlés Voting Record (2006b) Voting Record T/1035 Bill on the Supervision of Activities in the Field of Healthcare Insurance. www.parlament.hu/web/guest/iromanyok-elozo-ciklusbeli-adatai.Google Scholar
Országgyűlés Voting Record (2006c) Voting Record T/1375 Bill on the Development of the Healthcare System. www.parlament.hu/web/guest/iromanyok-elozo-ciklusbeli-adatai.Google Scholar
Országgyűlés Voting Record (2007) Voting Record T/4221 Bill on Health Insurance Funds and the Procedure for Claiming Benefits in Kind from Compulsory Health Insurance. www.parlament.hu/web/guest/iromanyok-elozo-ciklusbeli-adatai.Google Scholar
Pazitný, P and Zajac, R (2004) Ozdravené Zdravotníctvo v Službách Občanov. www.reformazdravotnictva.sk/pril/BielaKniha.pdf.Google Scholar
Pedersen, MN (1979) The Dynamics of European Party Systems: Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility. European Journal of Political Research 7(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1979.tb01267.x.Google Scholar
Powell, EN and Tucker, JA (2014) Revisiting Electoral Volatility in Post-Communist Countries: New Data, New Results and New Approaches. British Journal of Political Science 44(1), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123412000531.Google Scholar
Schmidt, MG (1996) When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy. European Journal of Political Research 30(2), 155–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1996.tb00673.x.Google Scholar
Sikk, A (2005) How Unstable? Volatility and the Genuinely New Parties in Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research 44(3), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00232.x.Google Scholar
Slovak Constitution (1992) The Constitution of the Republic of Slovakia. www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Slovakia_2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Slovak Constitution (2002) The Constitution of the Republic of Slovakia. www.prezident.sk/upload-files/46422.pdf.Google Scholar
Slovak Constitutional Court (2004) Decision on 17 May 2004, Decision Number PL. ÚS 38/03. www.slov-lex.sk/static/SK/ZZ/2004/396/vyhlasene_znenie.html.Google Scholar
Sólyom, L (2007) Hungarian Presidential Office Document I-2/5449-0/2007. www.parlament.hu/irom38/04221/04221-0334.pdf.Google Scholar
SOSR [Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic] (1998) Elections 1998 – Number and Share of Valid Votes for Political Parties. https://volby.statistics.sk/nrsr/nrsr1998/results/tab2.jsp.htm.Google Scholar
SOSR (2002a) Elections 2002 – Number and Share of Valid Votes for Political Parties. https://volby.statistics.sk/nrsr/nrsr2002/webdata/engl/tab/tab3.htm.Google Scholar
SOSR (2002b) Elections 2002 – Alignments of Seats to Political Parties. https://volby.statistics.sk/nrsr/nrsr2002/webdata/engl/tab/tab4.htm.Google Scholar
SOSR (2006) Elections 2006 – Number and Share of Valid Votes for Political Parties. https://volby.statistics.sk/nrsr/nrsr2006/angl/obvod/results/tab3.jsp.htm.Google Scholar
Spectator (2004a) Parliament in Review. 20 December. https://spectator.sme.sk/c/20024453/parliament-in-review.html.Google Scholar
Spectator (2004b) Healthcare Reform at Critical Point. 13 September. https://spectator.sme.sk/c/20023571/healthcare-reform-at-critical-point.html.Google Scholar
Spectator (2004c) Free Forum Presents Alternative Health Plan. 24 August. https://spectator.sme.sk/c/20023360/free-forum-presents-alternative-health-plan.html.Google Scholar
Spectator (2004d) Health Reform in Pain. 24 May. https://spectator.sme.sk/c/20022519/health-reform-in-pain.html.Google Scholar
Spectator (2005a) If Smer Ruled Slovakia. 7 March. https://spectator.sme.sk/c/20025160/if-smer-ruled-slovakia.html.Google Scholar
Spectator (2005b) Most Approve Reforms, Poll Shows. 21 December. https://spectator.sme.sk/c/20027774/most-approve-reforms-poll-shows.html.Google Scholar
Szabó, M (2011) From a Suppressed Anti-Communist Dissident Movement to a Governing Party: The Transformations of FIDESZ in Hungary. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 2(2), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvrf893j.17.Google Scholar
Szalay, T, Pažitný, P, Szalayová, A, Frisová, S, Morvay, K, Petrovič, M and van Ginneken, E (2011) Health Care Systems in Transition: Slovakia. Brussels: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.Google ScholarPubMed
Tavits, M (2008) On the Linkage between Electoral Volatility and Party System Instability in Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research 47(5), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00782.x.Google Scholar
Teune, H and Przeworski, A (1970) The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Toka, G and Popa, S (2013) Hungary. In Berglund, S (ed.), The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 291–338.Google Scholar
Tóth, A and Neumann, L (2008) Health Insurance Bill Passed in Spite of Nationwide Protest Strikes. Eurofound, 23 March. www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/article/2008/health-insurance-bill-passed-despite-nationwide-protest-strikes#.Google Scholar
Tsatsanis, E (2018) The Swift Unravelling: Party System Change and De-Institutionalization in Greece during the Crisis. In Lisi, M (ed.), Party System Change, the European Crisis and the State of Democracy. London: Routledge, pp. 115–136.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, T (1999) Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis. American Political Science Review 93(3), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, G (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tuttnauer, O (2018) If You Can Beat Them, Confront Them: Party-Level Analysis of Opposition Behavior in European National Parliaments. European Union Politics 19(2), 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517752870.Google Scholar