Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T02:28:09.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impromptu Speaking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Extract

A Striking development in recent years has been the rapidly increasing popularity of extempore addresses and discussions of various kinds. Although by no means confined to broadcasting, these are particularly prominent in the programmes of the B.B.C. Well-known men and women deliver impromptu speeches or improvise answers to questions on various points of political, ethical, social, literary, or scientific interest. Their audiences are generally large and appreciative, far larger than those commanded by the lecturer who has carefully prepared beforehand the substance and style of his address.

This cult of the impromptu speech has a close parallel in Greece of the sophistic era. A prominent member of the ‘Brains Trust’ in ancient Greece, had one existed, would undoubtedly have been Hippias of Elis. Aided by his vast knowledge, covering, it would seem, every branch of human activity, he used to appear before large audiences, such as the great Panhellenic Festival at Olympia, claiming to answer any question his hearers might put to him. He apparently fulfilled his promise, for he told Socrates that no one had yet got the better of him. However, his system of improvising answers broke down when confronted by Socrates’ inexorable cross-questioning on the nature of Beauty, and he had to ask Socrates for a few moments’ grace in order to think the question over quietly by himself.

A close rival of Hippias for ‘Brains Trust’ honours would have been Gorgias of Leontini. He, also, used to appear before large audiences professing his readiness to answer any questions, and once told Socrates it was many years since anyone had asked him anything new.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1 note 1 Plato,Hippias Minor 363d.

page 1 note 2 Ibid., 364a.

page 1 note 3 Plato, Hippias Maior 295a. Cf. 297e

page 1 note 4 Plato, Gorgias 447c, Meno 70b; Philostratus, Vit. Soph. p. 482 (Diels, Vorsokr. ii. 272).

page 1 note 5 Plato, Gorgias 448a.

page 1 note 6 Plato, Protagoras 329b, 335b.

page 1 note 7 e.g. Alcidamas; v. De Sophistis 23 (Blass).

page 1 note 8 Plato, Gorgias 449c, Phaedrus 267b.

page 2 note 1 Rhetorica ad Alexandrian 22. This work is generally ascribed to Anaximenes of Lampsacus.

page 2 note 2 This comes from the comment of Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle, De Soph. Elench. 15. 174b32 (Diels, Vorsokr. ii. 308).

page 2 note 3 Rhet. 2. 24. 3 and 3. 17. 11.

page 2 note 4 Aristotle, , Soph. Elench. 34.Google Scholar 183b36 (Diels, , Vorsokr. ii. 304).Google Scholar

page 2 note 5 Plato, Menex. 235c–d.

page 2 note 6 It has the alternative title On the Sophists.

page 4 note 1 De Soph. 28 (Blass).

page 4 note 2 Isocr., Ad Philippum 25–7.