Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Franke, Werner W.
Scheer, Ulrich
and
Herth, Werner
1974.
Fortschritte der Botanik.
Vol. 36,
Issue. ,
p.
1.
Article contents
Emerson and the Problem of Evil: Paradox and Solution
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 June 2011
Extract
The problem of evil has always been a great enigma. But there is something even more enigmatic about Emerson's handling of the problem. Critics have found that in the writings of Emerson this becomes an enigma shrouded in a mystery. We shall first sum up the important critical opinions about the Emersonian solution of this problem, then elucidate his theory of evil, and finally demonstrate how he overcomes the antinomy between the philosophical problem of evil and the personal problem of evil.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1969
References
1 Cited by Arvin, Newton, The House of Pain, Emerson: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Konvitz, Milton R. and Whicher, Stephen E. (Englewood CUffs, N.J., 1961), 46f.Google Scholar
2 Arvin, 47.
3 Arvin, 47.
4 Arvin, 48.
5 Whicher, Stephen E., Emerson's Tragic Sense, op. cit., 39.Google Scholar
6 Whicher, Stephen E., Freedom and Fate (Philadelphia, 1953), 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Ibid., 125.
8 Ibid., 70.
9 Arvin, 50.
10 Lewis, C. S., The Problem of Pain (New York, 1962), 9.Google Scholar
11 Caponigri, Robert A., Brownson and Emerson: Nature and History, New England Quarterly XVIII (Sept., 1945), 377.Google Scholar
12 The Journals in Selections from R. W. Emerson, edited by Whicher, Stephen E. (Boston, 1960), 62.Google Scholar All the citations from Emerson are taken from this book unless it is indicated otherwise, and exact page references are given in parentheses in the article immediately after the quotations.
13 Journals, April 18, 1824,Google ScholarSelections, 7.
14 Arvin, 50.
15 Nature, Selections, 55.
16 Ibid.
17 Cited by ARVIN, 56. See Gray, Henry David, Emerson (New York, 1958), 70:Google Scholar “Emerson's philosophy is negative not only in that it goes sufficiently far and with sufficient consistency to show that a rational explanation of the universe is impossible along Transcendental lines, but more positively negative, so to speak, in that it leads inevitably to the conclusion that the final and highest result of such philosophizing is the giving up of philosophy for questions of more practical value.”
18 Nature, 56.
19 Cited by Whicher, Stephen, Emerson's Tragic Sense, loc. cit., 42.Google Scholar
20 Ibid., 42
21 Ibid., 43.
22 Ibid.
23 See Pommer, Henry J., Emerson's First Marriage (Carbondale, 111., 1967), 50–81.Google Scholar
24 Journals of Ralph Waldo Emerson, ed. Gilman, W. H. and Ferguson, A. R. (Cambridge, Mass., 1963), III, 226f.Google Scholar
25 Journals, III, 285; see also the entry for March 4, 1831, ibid., 238: “The spring s i wearing into summer and life wearing into death; our friends are forsaking us, our hopes are declining; our mortifications are increasing and is the question settled in our minds, what objects we pursue with undivided aim? Have we fixed ourselves by principles?”
26 Letter to Mary Moody Emerson, Boston, February 8, 1831,Google ScholarThe Letters of Ralph Waldo Emerson, ed. Rusk, Ralph L. (New York, 1939), I, 318.Google Scholar
27 Journals, III, 230f.
28 Cited by Pollock, R. C., A Re-appraisal of Emerson's Thought, Thought XXXII (1957), 104.Google Scholar
29 Cited by Whicher, Stephen, Freedom and Fate, 60.Google Scholar
30 The Letters of R. W. Emerson, I, 321.
31 Journals, 259.
32 Literary History of the United States, eds., Spiller, Robert E. et al. (New York, 1963), 365Google Scholar.
- 1
- Cited by