Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:51:32.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Contrasting Attitudes towards Evil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

Ruth Manning Gordon
Ruth Manning Gordon
Affiliation:
Boston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The problem of evil is nearly as old as philosophy itself. At present, however, it is occupying a very prominent place in philosophic thought, perhaps because the horrors of the great war and the unsettled social conditions have brought home to us with added emphasis the evil in the world, and have upset some of our theories of the even tenor and progress of mankind.

Type
Research Article
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 1920 , pp. 56 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1920

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hoernlé, R. F. A., Neo-Realism and Religion, Harvard Theological Review, Vol. XI, April, 1918.Google Scholar

2 Hoernlé, R. F. A., Neo-Realism and Religion, Harvard Theological Review, Vol. XI, April, 1918.Google Scholar

3 Green, T. H., Prolegomena to Ethics, Book I, Chap. II, § 71Google Scholar.

4 Hocking, W. E., The Meaning of God in Human Experience, p. 220Google Scholar.

5 James, William, The Will to Believe, p. 47Google Scholar.

6 See above, p. 59.

7 Perry, R. B., The Moral Economy, p. 26Google Scholar.

8 Royce, Josiah, The Religious Aspect of Philosophy, p. 335Google Scholar.

9 Perry, R. B., Present Philosophical Tendencies, pp. 180–183Google Scholar.

10 W. E. Hocking, op. cit., p. 217.

11 Perry, R. B., Present Philosophical Tendencies, p. 247Google Scholar.

12 R. B. Perry, op. cit.

13 Miller, Dickinson, The Problem of Evil in the Present State of the World, Anglican Theological Review, Vol. I, No. 1Google Scholar.

14 Perry, R. B., The Moral Economy, p. 252Google Scholar.

15 Perry, R. B., Present Philosophical Tendencies, p. 268Google Scholar.

16 Bosanquet, Bernard, The Value and Destiny of the Individual, p. 215Google Scholar.

17 Hocking, W. E., Human Nature and Its Remaking, p. 217Google Scholar.

18 Bosanquet, Bernard, The Value and Destiny of the Individual, pp. 332 ffGoogle Scholar.

19 R. F. A. Hoernlé, op. cit.

20 Bosanquet, Bernard, Some Suggestions in Ethics, pp. 93 ffGoogle Scholar.

21 Hocking, W. E., Human Nature and Its Remaking, p. 217Google Scholar. (Italics mine.)

22 Hocking, W. E., Meaning of God in Human Experience, p. 436Google Scholar.

23 Hocking, W. E., Meaning of God in Human Experience, p. 176Google Scholar.

24 Bosanquet, Bernard, Some Suggestions in Ethics, p. 104Google Scholar.

25 Bosanquet, Bernard, The Value and Destiny of the Individual, p. 179Google Scholar.

26 Bosanquet, Bernard, Some Suggestions in Ethics, p. 117Google Scholar.

27 R. F. A. Hoernlé, op. cit.

28 Quoted by Bosanquet, Bernard, The Value and Destiny of the Individual, p. 161Google Scholar.

29 Bosanquet, Bernard, Some Suggestions in Ethics, p. 179Google Scholar.

30 Nicomachean Ethics, Book IV, Chap. 3, p. 22: “δ μεν γάρ μεγαλόψυχος δικαίως (δοξάξει καταφρονεῖ γὰρ ἀληθῶς) οἱ δὲ πολλοἰ τυχόντος.”

31 James, William, The Will to Believe, pp. 256, 257Google Scholar.

32 Hocking, W. E., Meaning of God in Human Experience, p. 332Google Scholar.

33 Perry, R. B., The Approach to Philosophy, p. 87Google Scholar.

34 R. B. Perry, op. cit., p. 109.

35 James, William, The Will to Believe, p. 122Google Scholar.

36 Wells, H. G., God the Invisible King, p. 99Google Scholar. (Quoted by Perry, R. B., The Conflict of Ideals, p. 329Google Scholar.)

37 R. F. A. Hoernlé, op. cit.

38 R. F. A. Hoernlé, op. cit.

39 Quoted by Russell, Bertrand, Mysticism and Logic, Chap. VGoogle Scholar.