Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T16:49:37.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anglo-Catholicism in the Church of England, 1895–1913: Abbot Aelred Carlyle and the Monks of Caldey Island

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

Rene M. Kollar
Affiliation:
Saint Vincent Archabbey Latrobe, Pennsylvania

Extract

From 1906–13, Abbot Aelred Carlyle (1874–1955) enjoyed immense popularity as an Anglo-Catholic, and, according to some, could have easily become the spokesman for this section of the Anglican Church. Through perseverance and diplomacy, he singlehandedly founded the first Benedictine monastery in the Church of England since the Reformation. Unlike others who sought and failed to bring Roman Catholic practices into the Established Church, Abbot Carlyle enjoyed the explicit ecclesiastical sanction of an Archbishop of Canterbury for his work, and with this seal of approval he could dismiss critics and disbelievers. By 1910, Abbot Carlyle and his community on Caldey Island, South Wales, had become a paradise for High Churchmen. The Abbot's charismatic and hypnotic personality attracted many who nostalgically longed for the glories of a medieval and united Christendom. Armed with a High Church theory of Benedictinism, Caldey became an enclave of ritualism, the “naughty underworld” of the Edwardian Anglican Church. Caldey was, at its peak, an exemplar of pre-Reformation Roman Catholic monasticism. In 1913, the experiment was in ruins. Carlyle refused to yield to the reforming zeal of the Bishop of Oxford and his attempts to force Caldey to conform to the comprehension of the Anglican Church. The result was sensational: a group of monks renounced the church of their baptism and sought admission to the Church of Rome.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cook, George Herbert, Letters to Cromwell and Others on the Suppression of the Monasteries (London: Baker, 1965)Google Scholar; Knowles, David, Christian Monasticism (New York: McGraw Hill, 1961)Google Scholar; The Monastic Order in England (Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1904)Google Scholar; The Religious Orders in England (3 vols.; Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1950)Google Scholar; Milliken, Ernest K., English Monasticism: Yesterday and Today (London: Harrap, 1967)Google Scholar; Younings, Joyce, The Dissolution of the Monasteries (New York: Barnes and Noble, 1971).Google Scholar

2 Allchin, Arthur M., The Silent Rebellion: Anglican Religious Communities, 1845–1900 (London: SCM, 1958)Google Scholar; Bowen, Desmond, The Idea of the Victorian Church (Montreal: McGill University, 1968)Google Scholar; Cumings, S. J., A History of Anglican Liturgy (New York: St. Martin's, 1969)Google Scholar; Maycock, Alan, Chronicles of Little Gidding (London: SPCK., 1954)Google Scholar; Nicholas Ferrar of Little Gidding (New York: Macmillan, 1938)Google Scholar; Williams, A. M., Conversations at Little Gidding (Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1938).Google Scholar

3 Anson, Peter, The Call of the Cloister: Religious Communities and Kindred Bodies in the Anglican Communion (London: SPCK, 1964)Google Scholar; Bossy, John, The English Catholic Community 1570–1850 (London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1975)Google Scholar; Holmes, J. Derek, More Roman than Rome: English Catholicism in the Nineteenth Century (London: Burns and Oates, 1970)Google Scholar; Sockman, Ralph, The Revival of the Conventual Life in the Church of England in the Nineteenth Century (New York: W. D. Gray, 1917)Google Scholar; Ward, Bernard, The Dawn of the Catholic Revival (New York: Longmans Green, 1909).Google Scholar

4 Ayling, Stanley, John Wesley (London: Collins, 1979)Google Scholar; Thompson, Edward P., The Making of the English Working Class (New York: Vintage, 1963).Google Scholar

5 Quoted in Liddon, H., Life of Edward Bouverie Pusey (4 vols.; London: Longmans, Green, 1893) 2. 38.Google Scholar

6 Newman, John Henry, Historical Sketches (New York: Longmans, Green, 1906) 2. 102. On 25 April 1842, Newman and a group of friends retired to Littlemore, Oxfordshire, to live a quasi-monastic life centered on the Benedictine breviary.Google Scholar

7 According to Peter Anson, seventy-three convents were established between 1847 and 1914. Twenty-seven died out quickly, but the remainder were still in existence at the outbreak of World War I. See Anson, Call of the Cloister, 595–98. The patronage of influential people (for example, Pusey, Lord John Manners, Gladstone, and Bishop Samuel Wilberforce) all lent respectability to sisterhoods.

8 See Allchin, Silent Rebellion, 139–55.

9 Parliament (Great Britain), Report from the Committee on Conventual and Monastic Institutes,” Parliament Papers (Commons) (1871) vol. 7 (Reports, vol. 1). The Report concluded: “Members of the Church of England, of the Greek Church, or of any other Church other than the Church of Rome, are prefectly free to make monastic vows, to enroll themselves in communities of a conventual or monastic character … ”(p. iii).Google Scholar

10 The Chronicle of Convocation, Upper House, 1891 (London: National Society's Depository, 1891) 4649Google Scholar. The Convocation eventually passed a resolution endorsing brotherhoods bound by vows and working in parishes under the supervision of the vicar. Ibid., 208–9, 235.

11 Conference, Lambeth, “Proceedings on the Religious Communities” (London: Lambeth Palace Library, 1897) LC 38, 161.Google Scholar

12 Report of the Royal Commission on Ecclesiastical Discipline (London: Wyman and Sons, 1906) 62. In 1904, there was a recrudescence of the ritual debate. The English episcopacy recognized that some sort of action was required. Certain people wanted the appointment of a select committee of the House of Commons to investigate ecclesiastical disorders. But to many churchmen this was unthinkable. Under the leadership of Archbishop Davidson, a compromise was reached: a Royal Commission composed of members of both Houses.Google Scholar

13 lbid., 62.

15 Under the provisions of the Act, a bishop could block a prosecution in his diocese. Consequently, the Act never had the power and force its supporters envisioned. For the background and the working of the Public Worship Regulation Act, see Bentley, James, Ritualism and Politics in Victorian England (London: Oxford University, 1978).Google Scholar

16 The Victorian Church (London: Black, 1971) Part 2, 325.Google Scholar

17 Report of the Royal Commission, 75–76. On the recommendation of the Commission, the Public Worship Regulation Act was repealed in 1906.

18 Davies, Horton, Worship and Theology in England: From Newman to Martineau (Princeton: Princeton University, 1962) 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 For the life of Abbot Carlyle and the Benedictine revival in the Church of England see Anson, Peter, Abbot Extraordinary (New York: Sheed and Ward, 1958)Google Scholar; Benedictines of Caldey (Gloucester: Prinknash Abbey, 1944).Google Scholar

20 Among them, St. Alban's, Holborn, All Saints, Margaret St., and St. Matthew's, Earl's Court, which were famous London ritualist Anglican churches. Roman Catholic churches on the Continent, especially Namur and Chartres, and the Carmelite Church in Kensington, West London, also impressed him. Carlyle visited the Cistercian monastery of St. Bernard's, Leicester, and also spent a great amount of time at Buckfast Abbey, where he almost converted to Roman Catholicism in 1895.

21 Aelred Carlyle to Frederick Temple, 24 January 1898 (Caldey: Davidson Papers, London: Lambeth Palace Library).

22 This religious fraternity was not sanctioned by the parish authorities in Ealing, London. Nor was there any desire on the part of the brotherhood to seek official recognition. It was essentially a lay fellowship composed of idealistic young Anglo-Catholics. See “Notes on the History of the Community,” Pax (September 1904) 8. Pax was the publication of the Caldey monks, and is still published by the monks of Prinknash Abbey, where the Caldey community eventually moved in 1928.Google Scholar

23 Carlyle, Aelred, “Constitutions of the Oblate Brothers of the Holy Order of St. Benedict”; “The English Order of St. Benedict: A Sketch” (Carlyle Papers; Cranham, Gloucester: Prinknash Abbey Archives, 1894, 1893).Google Scholar Lacking originality, these rules were based on Roman Catholic monastic writings. Carlyle also acknowledged his indebtedness to Fox, S., Monks and Monasteries: Being an Account of English Monasteries (London: James Burns, 1845) and the nineteenth-century French monastic writer, Jean Baptiste Muard.Google Scholar

24 With a few friends, Carlyle tried unsuccessfully to establish a monastic brotherhood at the following places before a period of stability, 1902–6, at Painsthorpe, Yorkshire: Ealing and the Isle of Dogs, London, Lower Guiting in Gloucestershire, Newton Abbot, and a short stay on Caldey Island in 1902.

25 Church Review (London, 3 February 1898).Google Scholar

26 Church Intelligencer (London, June 1898).Google Scholar

27 The Rock (London, 25 February 1898).Google Scholar

29 Church Intelligencer (March 1898).

30 Cheltenhan Free Press (21 May 1898).

31 Cheltenhan Chronicle (6 July 1898).

32 Cheltenhan Free Press (6 August 1898).

33 Rev. D. Cowan to F. Temple, 1 June 1897 (Caldey: Davidson Papers).

34 CarIyle to Rev. J. Green, 15 February 1898 (Carlyle Papers; Slough: Nashdom Abbey Archives).

35 “Vow Formula,” 20 February 1898 (Carlyle Papers; Prinknash Abbey Archives).

36 The original Charter is either misplaced or lost. Reproductions appeared in “Notes on the History of the Community,” Pax (March 1905) 81.Google Scholar

37 Carlyle to Temple, 24 February 1902 (Caldey: Davidson Papers).

38 Idem, 28 May 1902 (Caldey: Davidson Papers).

40 Kollar, Rene M., “Abbot Aelred Carlyle and the Monks of Caldey Island: Anglo-Catholicism in the Church of England, 1895–1913” (Ph.D. diss., University of Maryland, 1981) 159–64.Google Scholar

41 Maclagan to Owen, 6 December 1906 (Caldey: Davidson Papers).

42 Day, E. H., ed., The Benedictines of Caldey Island (Caldey Island: The Abbey, 1906) 32; Halifax to Hill, 31 October 1903 (Halifax Papers; York: The Borthwick Institute).Google Scholar

43 “Letter Dismissory,” Maclagan to Grafton, 26 September 1906 (Carlyle Papers; Prinknash Abbey Archives).Google Scholar

44 Archbishop Maclagan told Grafton that he would receive Carlyle as a priest in Colonial Orders, but instead issued a provisional license to officiate in York under the provisions of the 1871 Private Chapel's Act, 34 & 35 Victoria, chap. 66.

45 J. Owen to R. Davidson, 28 December 1911 (Caldey: Davidson Papers).

47 Owen to Davidson, 29 December 1911 (Caldey: Davidson Papers).

48 Idem, 28 December 1911 (Caldey: Davidson Papers).

49 Aelred Carlyle, Our Purpose and Method, printed in Day, Benedictines of Caldey Island, 67–111.

50 Carlyle, Aelred, “Customary and Ceremonial of the Regular Observance of the Fathers of the English Congregation of the Strict Observance of the Rule of Our Most Holy Father Saint Benedict” (Carlyle Papers; Prinknash Abbey Archives, 1908).Google Scholar

51 Anson, Peter, A Roving Recluse (Cork: Mercier, 1946) and Abbot Extraordinary. Anson was a monk of Caldey during the Anglican period.Google Scholar

52 A. Carlyle to P. Anson, 21 January 1938 (Carlyle Papers; Elgin: Pluscarden Abbey Archives).

56 Carlyle, Purpose and Method, 90.

57 Aelred Carlyle, “The Monastic Life,” The Holy Cross Magazine (August 1907) 178.Google Scholar

58 A. Carlyle to D. Prideaux, 6 November 1912 (Carlyle Papers; Prinknash Abbey Archives).

59 Quoted in Anson, Benedictines of Caldey, 139.

60 Upson, W., “Fifty Years Ago,” Pax (Spring 1963) 1.Google Scholar

61 A. Carlyle to Gore, 17 October 1912 (Prinknash Abbey Archives).

62 Kempson, F. Claude, “The Church in England, 1833–1908,” Pax (March 1908) 433.Google Scholar

63 “The Ceremonial of Caldey” (Prinknash Abbey Archives). The “Customary and Ceremonial of the Regular Observance” explained in detail the rubrics for Mass at Caldey.

65 “Community Letter,” Pax (September 1930) 30.Google Scholar

66 The Ceremonial of Caldey stated: “The Reverend Father Abbot also uses the mitre, the gloves, the dalmatic and tunic, when singing Mass in pontificalibus as provided in the Rubrics of the Missal Ritus servandus in celebratione Missae.”

67 Carlyle to Anson, 25 April 1910 (Prinknash Abbey Archives).

68 The Church Times, 25 June 1909.Google Scholar

69 The author was also impressed with the romantic effects of the liturgy. “As the office [Compline] proceeded the shades of evening became more and more intense; the two candles below the taller ones on the altar were extinguished, and the only light came from the red light suspended before the tabernacle.”

70 Ordo ad recipiendum et induendum novitium (Prinknash Abbey Archives).

71 “The Form of Receiving Monks to Solemn Profession” (Prinknash Abbey Archives).

72 “The Dedication of the Abbot's Chapel,” 8 December 1912 (Prinknash Abbey Archives).Google Scholar

73 Holy Week services, especially Mass of the Pre-Sanctified, Rogation Days, All Saints and All Souls Days, Veneration of Relics, Mass for the Departed, Festival of St. Peter's Chair and numerous patron feast days. See “Ceremonial of Caldey.”

74 Benediction was given according to the Roman rite on Sundays and Wednesdays. The Blessed Sacrament was in continued Reservation and Exposition took place on high holy days and the monthly day of recollection. See “Ceremonial of Caldey” and “Customary and Ceremonial.”

75 “Ceremonial of Caldey.”

76 Ibid. These were both condemned by the Report of the Royal Commission, 41–43.

77 “Ceremonial of Caldey.” The schedule of psalms was contained “in the commune de tempore of the Monastic Breviary.” Carlyle favored the edition “issued by the House of Descles et Cie of Tournay, finally revised for the use of the Benedictines in the year 1912. All members of the Congregation … are bound to attend the recitation of the Divine Office in choir.”

78 Barlay, A., “The Monastic Breviary,” Pax (March 1908) 393.Google Scholar

79 “The Abbey Guest House,” Pax (September 1910) 45.Google Scholar

80 “The Guest House,” Pax (Michaelmas, 1906) 36.Google Scholar

81 “The Guest.House,” Pax (March 1907) 152.Google Scholar

82 E. H. Day, “A Day at Caldey,” Benedictines of Caldey Island, 5.

83 Caldey Abbey Guest Book. There were few days when there were no guests staying in the monastery's guest house. During the first year, over 225 visitors stayed on Caldey. By August 1908, 139 visitors had registered in the guestbook for the year.

84 Halifax to Edward, 20 July 1980 (Halifax Papers). Halifax was part of a party consisting of the prominent Anglo-Catholics W. J. Birkbeck, Athelstan Riley, and Sir Samuel Hoare.

85 Halifax to Agnes, 20 July 1908 (Halifax Papers).

87 Halifax to Riley, October 1908 (Halifax Papers).

88 Carlyle to Halifax, 25 July 1908 (Halifax Papers).

89 Knox, Ronald, Spiritual Aenied, (London:Longmans Green, 1918) 80.Google Scholar

90 Ibid., 80–81.

91 Ibid., 82. Knox remained in close touch with Caldey during its Anglican period. When he converted in 1917, Abbot Carlyle congratulated him and offered him aid. Carlyle to Knox, 17 September 1917; 25 September 1917 (Mells, Somerset: Knox Papers).

92 Mackay to Halifax, 10 November 1910 (Halifax Papers).

93 Day to Halifax, 16 August 1911 (Halifax Papers).

94 Carlyle to Halifax, 8 December 1911 (Halifax Papers).

95 Idem, 22 February 1912 (Halifax Papers).

96 R. Davidson, “Interview at Lambeth, 6 March 1912, with the Abbot of Caldey” (Caldey: Davidson Papers).

98 These priests would be exempt from the educational requirements, normally a university degree, and the deacon year spent in a parish. Moreover, they would not be required to use the Book of Common Prayer, and Abbot Carlyle would become their ecclesiastical superior, not the Bishop of St. David's.

99 Davidson to Gore, 7 March 1912 (Caldey: Davidson Papers).

100 Carlyle, “Original Interview Notes” (Carlyle Papers; Prinknash Abbey Archives).

101 Davidson to Gore, 7 March 1912.

102 Gore to Davidson, 10 April 1912 (Caldey: Davidson Papers).

103 Gore to Davidson, 19 March 1912 (Caldey: Davidson Papers). In spite of the recommendations of the 1887 Lambeth Conference's report on religious brotherhoods, Caldey had no Episcopal Visitor.

104 Davidson to Carlyle, 20 May 1912 (Carlyle Papers; Prinknash Abbey Archives).

105 Carlyle to Davidson, 29 August 1912 (Carlyle Papers; Prinknash Abbey Archives).

106 Gore to Carlyle, 24 October 1912 (Carlyle Papers; Prinknash Abbey Archives). Carlyle had hoped that Gore would personally visit Caldey, but the Bishop's busy schedule would not permit this plan. Both priests, who were Anglo-Catholics, knew Carlyle and were sympathetic to the Anglican Benedictines.

107 Carlyle to Stone, 9 January 1913 (Carlyle Papers; Prinknash Abbey Archives).

108 Stone and Trevelyan to Gore, 21 January 1913 (Stone Papers; Oxford: Pusey House Library).

109 Ibid.

110 Gore to Carlyle, 8 February 1913 (Carlyle Papers; Prinknash Abbey Archives).

111 The ownership of the property was vested in Abbot Carlyle alone. The three established Anglican brotherhoods, the Cowley Fathers, the Society of the Resurrection, and the Society of the Sacred Mission, had legislated that their property would be vested in a trust under the supervision of the Anglican Church. The Established Church always tried to regulate and oversee the property owned by religious brotherhoods. The 1908 Lambeth Conference report on brotherhoods stressed that “provision for due rules as to the possession and disposition of property” should be stipulated in the community's by-laws. “Report of the Committee Appointed in 1897 to Consider the Relations of Religious Communities With the Church to the Episcopate” (Lambeth Conference, 1908) 5.Google Scholar

112 Gore to Carlyle, 8 February 1913.

113 Carlyle to Gore, 11 February 1913 (Carlyle Papers; Prinknash Abbey Archives).

114 Including Abbot Carlyle, there were thirty-one monks on Caldey in 1913. Three Anglican priests did not convert. Denys Prideaux, one of the “faithful remnant,” became the founder of a new Anglican monastery at Pershore. The community later moved to Nashdom, Slough.

115 Carlyle, “Questionnaire,” 18 February 1913 (Carlyle Papers; Prinknash Abbey Archives).

116 Carlyle, “Notes of the Address to the Community of Caldey,” 18 February 1913 (Carlyle Papers; Prinknash Abbey Archives).

117 Carlyle, “Questionnaire.”

118 Davidson to Gore, 24 February 1913 (Caldey: Davidson Papers).

119 Fowler to Davidson, 11 March 1913 (Caldey: Davidson Papers).

120 “Home—At Last,” Churchman's Magazine (April 1913) 110.Google Scholar

121 The Church Times (7 March 1913).Google Scholar

122 The Church Times (28 February 1913).Google Scholar

123 Catholic Times (28 February 1913).Google Scholar During the summer of 1905, the Catholic Times printed a series of articles attacking Carlyle's brotherhood. The Anglican monks, according to one report, were guilty of “spreading heresy and error in England, and propagating that last new sect, Catholicism without Rome”(Catholic Times [28 July 1905]).Google Scholar

124 The Times (17 March 1913).Google Scholar