Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:40:29.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eloquence, Cogency, or Sleight of Hand: A Reply to Klempner

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Errol E Harris
Errol E Harris*
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 14 , Issue 1-2: number 27/28 , 1993 , pp. 98 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mechanisms, it must be noted, are not incompatible with teleology. In fact, every mechanism is an organized whole and, especially in the organism, every mechanism serves a function and all are teleological. See my Foundations of Metaphysics in Science (London, G Allen and Unwin, 1965 Google Scholar, reprinted Lanham, New York and London, University Press of America, 1983, and Atlantic Highlands, Humanities Press, 1993), Ch XIII.