Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T15:01:57.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel's Ontological Argument: A Reconstruction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2022

Jake McNulty Open the ORCID record for Jake McNulty [Opens in a new window]
Jake McNulty*
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, USA mcnulty.jake@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

This essay takes up a challenge recently posed by Graham Oppy: to clearly express, in premise-conclusion form, Hegel's version of the ontological argument. In addition to employing this format, it seeks to supplement existing treatments by locating a core component of Hegel's argument in a slightly different place than is common. Whereas some prominent recent treatments (Williams, Bubbio, Melechar) focus on Hegel's definition of the Absolute as the Concept, from the third part of his Science of Logic (the Doctrine of the Concept), mine focuses on earlier definitions from the first (the Doctrine of Being). As I hope to show, there are even more resources in Hegel's Logic for an ontological argument than those emphasized in recent treatments: the concept, the Idea, etc. Already in the first third of the Logic, we find a compelling response to a famous Kantian counter-argument to the ontological proof. The counter-argument is summed up in the phrase ‘existence [Sein] is not a real predicate’. Hence, Hegel's response as I interpret it will take the form of a competing analysis of Being, a Lehre vom Sein (Doctrine of Being). What do we learn when we put the ontology back into Hegel's ontological argument? That Being is neither predicate, nor subject, nor copula, but a monist (or ‘infinite’) category. The larger importance of this exercise to our understanding of Hegel's thought lies in the way it clarifies his profound debt to even non-idealist conceptions of God, such as the one espoused by Spinoza.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , August 2023 , pp. 275 - 296
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Hegel Society of Great Britain

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameriks, K. (2000), Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. (2019), A Spirit of Trust: A Reading of Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bubbio, D. (2017), God and the Self in Hegel: Beyond Subjectivism. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Bubbio, D. and Redding, P. (2014), ‘Hegel and the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God’, Religious Studies 50:4: 465–86.Google Scholar
Franks, P. (2005), All Or Nothing: Systematicity, Skepticism and Transcendental Arguments in German Idealism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harrelson, K. (2008), The Ontological Argument from Descartes to Hegel. Amherst NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Henrich, D. (1960), Der Ontologische Gottesbeweiß. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2006), From Being to Infinity: the Opening of Hegel's Logic. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2021), Hegel on Being. 2 vols. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Inwood, M. (2018), ‘Hegel’, in Oppy, G. (ed.), Ontological Arguments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1998), Critique of Pure Reason, ed. and trans. Guyer, P. and Wood, A. W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. (2012), Ontologie der Selbstbestimmung: Eine Operationale Rekonstruktion von Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melichar, G. (2020), Die Objektivität des Absoluten: Der ontologische Gottesbeweis in Hegels ‘Wissenschaft der Logik’ im Spiegel der kantischen Kritik. Collegium Metaphysicum 23. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.Google Scholar
Oppy, G. (2010), ‘The Ontological Argument from Descartes To Hegel (review)’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 48:2: 243–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppy, G. (2019), “Ontological Arguments”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Philosophy Department, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. (2018), Hegel's Realm of Shadows: Logic as Metaphysics in “the Science of Logic”. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, R. (2016), ‘“Determination is Negation”: The Adventures of a Doctrine from Spinoza to Hegel to the British Idealists’, Hegel Bulletin 37:1: 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. (2017), Hegel on the Proofs and Personhood of God: Studies in Hegel's Logic and Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar