Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T10:50:55.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deleuze and Guattari’s ‘War Machine’ as a Critique of Hegel’s Political Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2018

Nathan Widder
Nathan Widder*
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London, UKn.e.widder@rhul.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

This paper elaborates Deleuze and Guattari’s ‘war machine’ in relation to key theses in Hegel’s political philosophy, with the aim of showing how it illuminates the conditions under which politics and political institutions as Hegel understands them both emerge and are compromised. After first introducing the idea of the war machine and its appropriation by discussing it in relation to Carl Schmitt’s theory of partisan warfare, it examines both the war machine and Hegel’s theory of the State by way of a focus on Hegel’s discussions of drive (Trieb) and semblance (Schein). Regarding the first, the paper explores how both Hegel and Deleuze and Guattari conceive of social structure in terms of a structure of drives even while they differ in their understandings of the drives in relation to desire and subjectivity. Regarding the second, the paper explores how moments of semblance identified by Hegel as he develops his system of Right reveal points where the war machine can emerge from within State structures. The paper argues that the war machine concept challenges understandings of politics built on friend/enemy antagonisms and the use of external conflict to secure internal unity, the former being Schmitt’s explicit political project and the second being the place at which Hegel’s project ultimately finds itself when it fails to secure the rational structure of Ethical Life.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 39 , Special Issue 2: Hegel and Twentieth-Century French Philosophy , October 2018 , pp. 304 - 325
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blanchot, M. (1988), The Unavowable Community, trans. P. Joris. Barytown NY: Station Hill.Google Scholar
Bogue, R. (2004), ‘Apology for Nomadology’, Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies 6:2: 169–179.Google Scholar
Cheah, P. (2013), ‘Political Bodies Without Organs: On Hegel’s Ideal State and Deleuzian Micropolitics’, in J. Vernon and K. Houle (eds.), Hegel and Deleuze: Together Again for the First Time. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
CNN (2003), ‘Transcript of Blair’s speech to Congress’. Last Viewed 9 February 2017. Available at: http://edition.cnn.com/2003/US/07/17/blair.transcript/.Google Scholar
Connolly, W. E. (2011), A World of Becoming. Durham NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1983), Nietzsche and Philosophy, trans. H. Tomlinson. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1983), Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. R. Hurley, M. Seem and H. R. Lane. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Durst, D. (2001), ‘The End(s) of the State in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right ’, in R. R. Williams (ed.), Beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism: Studies in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1990), The History of Sexuality, Volume One, trans. R. Hurley. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1967), The Philosophy of Right, trans. T. M. Knox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1998), Leviathan, ed. J. C. A. Gaskin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, E. (2003a), ‘Representation and Misrepresentation in Postcolonial Literature and Theory’, Research in African Literatures 34:1: 159–173.Google Scholar
Holland, E. (2003b), ‘To the Editor’, Research in African Literatures 34:4: 187–190.Google Scholar
Hyppolite, J. (1974), Genesis and Structure of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. S. Cherniak and J. Heckman. Evanston Ill: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S. (2009), ‘Hegel’s Concept of Desire’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 47:1: 103–130.Google Scholar
Kojève, A. (1969), An Introduction to the Reading of Hegel, trans. J. H. Nichols, Jr., ed. A. Bloom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Marder, M. (2016), ‘Anti-Nomad’, Deleuze Studies 10:4: 496–503.Google Scholar
Miller, C. (1993), ‘The Postidentitarian Predicament in the Footnotes of A Thousand Plateaus: Nomadology, Anthropology, and Authority’, Diacritics 23:3: 6–35.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1967), On the Genealogy of Morals, trans. W. Kaufmann. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Noyes, J. (2004), ‘Nomadism, Nomadology, Postcolonialism: By Way of Introduction’, Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies 6:2: 159–168.Google Scholar
Patton, P. (2018), ‘Plateau 12: 1227 AD: Treatise on Nomadology—The War Machine’, in H. Somers-Hall, J. Bell and J. Williams (eds.), A Thousand Plateaus and Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. (2011), Hegel on Self-Consciousness: Desire and Death in the Phenomenology of Spirit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rae, G. (2013), ‘Violence, Territorialization, and Signification: The Political from Carl Schmitt and Gilles Deleuze’, Theoria and Praxis 1:1: 1–17.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2004), ‘The Theory of the Partisan: A Commentary/Remark on the Concept of the Political’, in The New Centennial Review, trans. A. C. Goodson 4:3: 1–78.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2007), The Concept of the Political (Expanded Edition), trans. G. Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, D. W. (2012), Essays on Deleuze. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Somers-Hall, H. (2012), Hegel, Deleuze, and the Critique of Representation: Dialectics of Negation and Difference. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Vernon, J. and Houle, K. (eds.) (2013), Hegel and Deleuze: Together Again for the First Time. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Widder, N. (2003), ‘Thought after Dialectics: Deleuze’s Ontology of Sense’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 41:3: 451–476.Google Scholar
Widder, N. (2015), ‘State Philosophy and the War Machine’, in C. Lundy and D. Voss (eds.), At the Edges of Thought: Deleuze and Post-Kantian Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar