Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T01:06:28.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel contra Hegel: Eurocentrism, Colonialism, and Progress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2024

Erick Lima Open the ORCID record for Erick Lima [Opens in a new window]
Erick Lima*
Affiliation:
Universidade de Brasília, Brazil erick.lima@unb.br
Get access

Abstract

This study aims to investigate whether some of the Eurocentric and colonialist contents of Hegel's thought are open to criticism with elements of his own philosophy. First, I intend to show that some of these contents can be organized around the connection between ‘spirit’ and ‘progress’. I then construct an interpretation of Hegel's notion of spirit, based upon which I discuss its possibly pro-colonialist tendencies, arguing that disconnected from the philosophy of history it establishes a connection of autonomy and critique crucial even for anti-colonialist thought. Furthermore, following Adorno's criticism of Hegel, I investigate the possibility of finding in the ‘progress in the consciousness of freedom’ an experiential dimension capable of capturing its regressive moments. This analysis then leads to a discussion of colonization in the reconstruction of capitalist society presented in the Philosophy of Right, which reveals an important discrepancy, so I argue, concerning the Eurocentrism of the Philosophy of History. Finally, I propose a comparison of Hegel's discussion of colonization with Marx's theory of ‘primitive accumulation’, and evaluate thereby the pertinence of Hegel's connection between imperialism and the critique of capitalism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hegel Bulletin , First View , pp. 1 - 28
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Hegel Society of Great Britain

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. (1993), Hegel: Three Studies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (2005), ‘Progress’, in Adorno, T., Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. (2006), History and Freedom: Lectures 1964–1965, in Tiedmann, R. (ed.). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. (2017), An introduction to dialectics (1958). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Allen, A. (2016), The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avineri, S. (1974), Hegel's Theory of Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (1998), ‘Hegel at the Court of the Ashanti’, in Barnett, S. (ed.), Hegel After Derrida. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (2000), ‘With what must the philosophy of world history begin? On the racial basis of Hegel's eurocentrism’, Nineteenth-Century Contexts: An Interdisciplinary Journal 22:2: 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchwalter, A. (2009), ‘Is Hegel's Philosophy of History Eurocentric?’, in Dudley, W. (ed.) Hegel and History. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Cain, P. (2002), Hobson and Imperialism. Radicalism, New Liberalism, and Finance 1887–1938. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Salvo, C. J. (2015), ‘Hegel's Torment: Poverty and the Rationality of the Modern State’, in Buchwalter, A. (ed.), Hegel and Capitalism. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Dudley, W. (2009), Hegel and History. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Dussel, E. (1996), The Underside of Modernity. New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1990), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2001), The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habib, M. A. R. (2017), Hegel and Empire. From Postcolonialism to Globalism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2001), Spaces of Capital. Towards a Critical Geography. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2000), Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Herzog, L. (2013), Inventing the Market. Smith, Hegel, and Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, L. (2015), ‘Two Ways of “Taming” the Market: Why Hegel Needs the Police and the Corporations’, in Buchwalter, A. (ed.), Hegel and Capitalism. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. (2016), Imperialism: A Study. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hodgson, P. C. (2012), Shapes of Freedom. Hegel's Philosophy of World History in Theological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. (2009), Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. (2010), The Pathologies of Individual Freedom: Hegel's Social Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. (2015), Freedom's Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. and Koch, F. (2014), ‘The normativity of ethical life’, Philosophy & Social Criticism 40:8: 817–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. and Menke, C. (2006), Theodor W. Adorno: Negative Dialektik. Berlin: Akademie.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggi, R. and Celikates, R. (2017), Sozialphilosohie: eine Einführung. München: C.H. Beck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khurana, T. and Menke, C. (eds.) (2011), Paradoxien der Autonomie. Berlin: August.Google Scholar
Kimmerle, H. (2016), ‘Hegel's Eurocentric Concept of Philosophy’, Confluence: Journal of World Philosophies 1. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/iupjournals/index.php/confluence/article/view/524.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1952), Race and History. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Lima, E. (2020), ‘The Normative Authority of Social Practices: A Critical Theoretical Reading of Hegel's Introduction to the Philosophy of Right’, Hegel Bulletin 41:2: 271–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukács, G. (1977), Studies in the Relations between Dialectics and Economics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, I. (2020), ‘Philosophy of History’, in Gordon, P. E. (ed.), A Companion to Adorno. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1977), A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1982), Capital: Critique of Political Economy. Volume 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1991), Capital: Critique of Political Economy. Volume 3. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
McCarney, J. (2000), Hegel on History. London Routledge.Google Scholar
Menke, C. (2018), Autonomie und Befreiung. Studien zu Hegel. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Müller, M. (2022), Filosofia do Direito de G.W.F Hegel. Tradução e Notas. Editora 34.Google Scholar
Pradella, L. (2014), ‘Hegel, Imperialism, and Universal History’, Science & Society 78:4: 426–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, T. (2020), Capital and Ideology. Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. P. (2002), German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkard, T. (2020), ‘What Is Negative Dialectics?: Adorno's Reevaluation of Hegel’, in Gordon, P. E. (ed.), A Companion to Adorno. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. B. (2005), Brandom's Hegel. European Journal of Philosophy 13:3: 381–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. (2008), Hegel's Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruda, F. (2011), Hegel's Rabble: An Investigation into Hegel's Philosophy of Right. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sandkaulen, B. (2006), ‘Modell 2: Weltgeist und Naturgeschichte. Exkurs zu Hegel. Adornos Geschichtsphilosophie mit und gegen Hegel’, in Honneth, A., Menke, C. and Adorno, Theodor W., Negative Dialektik. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Stone, A. (2020), ‘Hegel and Colonialism’, Hegel Bulletin 41:2: 247–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, M. (2013), Hegel and Greek Tragedy, trans. Wilhelm, H.-J.. New York: Lexington.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. (2015), ‘Capitalism as Deficient Modernity: Hegel against the Modern Economy’, in Buchwalter, A., Hegel and Capitalism. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Tibebu, T. (2011), Hegel and the Third World. Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Wakefield, E. G. (2022), A Letter From Sydney. London: Legare Street Press.Google Scholar
Weil, E. (1970), Hegel et l’état. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Zambrana, R. (2017), ‘Hegel, History, and Race’, in Zack, N. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2011), The Politics of Negativity, in Ruda, F., Hegel's Rabble: An Investigation into Hegel's Philosophy of Right. London: Continuum.Google Scholar