Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T19:53:55.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-articulating Genealogy: Hegel on Kinship, Race and Reproduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2019

Susanne Lettow
Susanne Lettow*
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin, Germany
*
lettow2@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Get access

Abstract

In the decades around 1800, genealogical imaginaries, or the social, political, economic and cultural meanings of descent and kinship, underwent far-reaching change. Hegel was deeply concerned with these transformations in various respects and in different parts of his philosophy. By engaging with the issues of kinship and family, with the disputes over racial diversity as well as with the scientific debates about life, reproduction and the meaning of sexual difference, Hegel contributed to a philosophical re-articulation of genealogical relations, or to the shaping of a new vocabulary through which the political, social, cultural and epistemic transformations of the period were rendered intelligible in distinctive ways. Although Hegel did not draw explicit connections between his reflections on kinship, race and reproduction, my aim is to explore the semantic interrelations among his reflections on these issues.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , August 2021 , pp. 256 - 276
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ariès, P. (1962), Centuries of Childhood. A Social History of the Family. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Bach, T. (2004), ‘Leben als Gattungsprozess: Historisch-systematische Anmerkungen zur Unterscheidung von Pflanze und Tier bei Hegel’, in Neuser, W. and Wandscheider, D. (eds.), Logik, Mathematik und Natur im objektiven Idealismus. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (1998), ‘Hegel at the Court of the Ashanti’, in Barnett, S. (ed.), Hegel After Derrida. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (2001), ‘What Must the Philosophy of World History Begin With? On the Racial Basis of Hegel's Eurocentrism’, Nineteenth Century Studies 22:2: 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (2002), ‘Kant as an Unfamiliar Source of Racism’, in Ward, J. K. and Lott, T. L. (eds.), Philosophers on Race: Critical Essays. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bernier, F. (1684), ‘Nouvelle division de la terre par des espèces ou races qui l'habitent’, Journal des Scavants 6: 130-40. Available at: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k56535g.image.langEN.f135 (last accessed 19/01/2019).Google Scholar
Bock von Wülfingen, B., Brandt, Ch., Lettow, S. and Vienne, F. (2015), ‘Temporalities of Reproduction: Practices and Concepts from the Eighteenth to the Early Twenty-First Century’, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 37:1: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowman, B. (2011), ‘Goethean Morphology, Hegelian Science. Affinities and Transformations’, Goethe Yearbook 18:18: 159–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck-Morss, S. (2009), Hegel, Haiti, and Universal History. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (2000), Antigone's Claim: Kinship Between Life and Death. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chanter, T. (2010), ‘Antigone's Liminality: Hegel's Racial Purification of Tragedy and the Naturalization of Slavery’, in Hutchings, K. and Pulkkinen, T. (eds.), Hegel's Philosophy and Feminist Thought. Beyond Antigone? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Church, M. (2011), ‘Immanuel Kant and the Emergence of Modern Geography’, in Elden, S. and Mendieta, E. (eds.), Reading Kant's Geography. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Donzelot, J. (1997), The Policing of Families. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Duchet, M. (1971), Anthropologie et histoire au siècle des lumières. Buffon, Voltaire, Rousseau, Helvétius, Diderot. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar
Eldridge, S. V. (2016), Novel Affinities. Composing the Family in the German Novel, 1795–1830. Rochester: Camden House.Google Scholar
Engelstein, S. (2017), Sibling Action. The Genealogical Structure of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrini, C. (2009), ‘Reason Observing Nature’, in Westphal, K. R. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holland, J. (2009), German Romanticism and Science: The Procreative Politics of Goethe, Novalis, and Ritter. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, K. (2017), ‘Living the Contradictions: Wives, Husbands and Children in Hegel's Elements of the Philosophy of Right’, in James, D. (ed.), Hegel's Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchings, K. and Pulkkinen, T. (eds.) (2010), Hegel's Philosophy and Feminist Thought. Beyond Antigone? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, I. (1996), Sexuality, State and Civil Society in Germany, 1700–1815. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, L. (1992), The Family Romance of the French Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, F. (1989), The Logic of Life: A History of Heredity. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Jarzebowski, C. (2006), Inzest. Verwandtschaft und Sexualität im achtzehnten Jahrhundert. Köln: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1801), Physische Geographie, ed. Vollmer, G.. Mainz and Hamburg: Gottfried Vollmer (http://digital.bibliothek.uni-halle.de/hd/content/pageview/938270)Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2007), ‘Of the different races of human beings’, trans. Wilson, H. and Zöller, G., in Zöller, G. and Louden, R. E. (eds.), Anthropology, History, and Education. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, ed. by Guyer, P. and Wood, A. W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirkland, S. D. and Chanter, T. (eds) (2014), The Returns of Antigone: Interdisciplinary Essays. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. (2002), ‘The Eighteenth Century as the Beginning of Modernity’, in The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lagier, R. (2004), Les races humaines selon Kant. Paris: Presses Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
Lehleiter, C. (2014), Romanticism, Origins and the History of Heredity: New Studies in the Age of Goethe. Lewisburg: Bucknell Press.Google Scholar
Lepenies, W. (1976), Das Ende der Naturgeschichte. Wandel kultureller Selbstverständlichkeiten in den Wissenschaften des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts. München und Wien: Hanser.Google Scholar
Lettow, S. (2014a), ‘Generation, genealogy and time: The concept of reproduction from histoire naturelle to Naturphilosophie’, in Lettow, S. (ed.), Reproduction, race, and gender in philosophy and the early life sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lettow, S. (ed.) (2014b), Reproduction, race, and gender in philosophy and the early life sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Mills, P. J. (ed.) (2006), Feminist Interpretations of G.W.F. Hegel. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Monahan, M. (ed.) (2017), Creolizing Hegel. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Müller-Wille, S. and Rheinberger, H.-J. (eds.) (2007), Heredity Produced: at the Crossroads of Biology, Politics, and Culture, 1500–1870. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolson, M. (1990), ‘Alexander von Humboldt and the geography of vegetation’, in Cunningham, A. (ed.), Romanticism and the Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, R. (2004), Novel Relations. The Transformation of Kinship in English Literature and Culture 1748–1818. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reill, P. H. (2005), Vitalizing Nature in the Enlightenment. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, R. (2003), ‘The Earth Sciences’, in Porter, R. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Science Vol 4. Eighteenth Century Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sabean, D. W. (1998), Kinship in Neckarhausen 1700–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sabean, D. W. and Teuscher, S. (2013), ‘Introduction’, in Johnson, C. H., Jussen, B. and Sabean, D. W. (eds.), Blood and Kinship: Matter for Metaphor from Ancient Rome to the Present. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Söderback, F. (ed.) (2010), Feminist Readings of Antigone. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Steffens, H. [1822] (1922), Anthropologie. Stuttgart: Der Kommende Tag.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. L. (1995), Race and the Education of Desire. Foucault's History of Sexuality and the Colonial Order of Things. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, A. (2010), ‘Matter and Form: Hegel, Organicism and the Difference between Women and Men’, in Hutchings, K. and Pulkkinen, T. (eds.), Hegel's Philosophy and Feminist Thought: Beyond Antigone? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stone, A. (2014), ‘Sexual Polarity in Schelling and Hegel’, in Lettow, S. (ed.), Reproduction, Race and Gender in Philosophy and the Early Life Sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Stone, A. (2017), ‘Hegel and Colonialism’, Hegel Bulletin. doi:10.1017/hgl.2017.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitt, M. S. (2013), ‘The Problem of Poverty and the Limits of Freedom in Hegel's Theory of the Ethical State’, Political Theory 41:2: 257–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar